I like it, but it lacks enforcement seeing how there is only 2 super mods. I think it should express that it is also the duty of subverse mods to enforce these rules, seeing as it's impossible to post dox dump on voat if no subverse will allow it. I'm aware this requires trust in mods, it appears as though corrupted mods simply do not make it far at all in voat so I don't see a big problem with giving them this duty.
Our Community Policy
Alright, nice. This hits it home. The rarity of this rule being broken requires little enforcement effort. This rule alone should justify any further /v/niggers or /v/chicago indecent. However the term "Out Community Policy" is to vague. I think a name such as "Moderator-User Relationship Policy" is more suited. With a name like that we could amend additional clauses to the policy regarding moderators and users.... which will likely occur sooner or later.
Catch All Policy
I don't like this one, but I get what you're trying to do. Perhaps rename it to "Generic Subverse Policy" and let it read something like
Subverses of generic topics and subjects (Especially topics and subjects that inherently have opinionated or debatable preference) must allow all subsets of the topic or subject in question to exist on the subverse.
As in the topic "vehicles" has includes subsets of each brand of cars. And those subsets can not be discriminated against. This also means "news" can not filter either liberal and conservative subsets.
Sexualized Content of Minors
Okay here we go. For questions like "what about nude culture?" or "what about loli?". You need to specify those subjects specifically because those questions are actually OK under US law.
view the rest of the comments →
7584835? ago
Dox Policy
I like it, but it lacks enforcement seeing how there is only 2 super mods. I think it should express that it is also the duty of subverse mods to enforce these rules, seeing as it's impossible to post dox dump on voat if no subverse will allow it. I'm aware this requires trust in mods, it appears as though corrupted mods simply do not make it far at all in voat so I don't see a big problem with giving them this duty.
Our Community Policy
Alright, nice. This hits it home. The rarity of this rule being broken requires little enforcement effort. This rule alone should justify any further /v/niggers or /v/chicago indecent. However the term "Out Community Policy" is to vague. I think a name such as "Moderator-User Relationship Policy" is more suited. With a name like that we could amend additional clauses to the policy regarding moderators and users.... which will likely occur sooner or later.
Catch All Policy
I don't like this one, but I get what you're trying to do. Perhaps rename it to "Generic Subverse Policy" and let it read something like
As in the topic "vehicles" has includes subsets of each brand of cars. And those subsets can not be discriminated against. This also means "news" can not filter either liberal and conservative subsets.
Sexualized Content of Minors
Okay here we go. For questions like "what about nude culture?" or "what about loli?". You need to specify those subjects specifically because those questions are actually OK under US law.
Sorry to break the one comment one rule rule.