Moderators that decide to alter rules in a subverse that results in new content being deleted and/or users banned, where said content and/or users were previously allowed, and vice versa, must get community support before putting these changes into effect.
How is this realistically going to be determined? Voting is not an accurate way to gauge user opinion, and what about very small subs or subs that have almost no discussion on them at all, such as music or porn subs?
Moderators that control generic subverses must allow free conversation to occur and not stifle it, unless clearly defined upon subverse creation.
Why? Any moderator that does this is witch hunted by the community to the point where they can't participate on the site anyway. This is going to make deletions even harder for moderators.
Voat strictly prohibits all doxing (posting of personally identifiable information) of a Voat user. Your account will be immediately and permanently banned. We have been very poor at handling dox issues but we cannot allow this to happen going forward.
If this is the case, will you be going back over previous doxxing episodes and banning the people involved?
view the rest of the comments →
7584485? ago
How is this realistically going to be determined? Voting is not an accurate way to gauge user opinion, and what about very small subs or subs that have almost no discussion on them at all, such as music or porn subs?
Why? Any moderator that does this is witch hunted by the community to the point where they can't participate on the site anyway. This is going to make deletions even harder for moderators.
If this is the case, will you be going back over previous doxxing episodes and banning the people involved?