I don't know anything about it, but the ONLY viable option is #1. #2 is giving completely up on freedom of speech. If you allow a terrorist to shut it down then we might as well go back to reddit. #3 is effectively the same as #2. It is an admit defeat and run away approach.
The only option is to ban the evil oppressor that has nothing better to do with his (her?) time than infringe on the rights of others. EVERY effort (although I'm fairly sure there are no effective means) should be taken to ban the user in question. They should not be allowed on the site ever again if there were any possible way to block them.
For your principles to mean anything at all you have to apply them to people with whom you disagree.
view the rest of the comments →
7559050? ago
I don't know anything about it, but the ONLY viable option is #1. #2 is giving completely up on freedom of speech. If you allow a terrorist to shut it down then we might as well go back to reddit. #3 is effectively the same as #2. It is an admit defeat and run away approach.
The only option is to ban the evil oppressor that has nothing better to do with his (her?) time than infringe on the rights of others. EVERY effort (although I'm fairly sure there are no effective means) should be taken to ban the user in question. They should not be allowed on the site ever again if there were any possible way to block them.
For your principles to mean anything at all you have to apply them to people with whom you disagree.