Option 1. I came here for freedom of speech. I've got /v/niggers blocked, but I agree with the majority that they should be free to express their opinions.
With that said, rinse and repeat isn't sustainable. There needs to be some kind of process in place to define and handle rogue moderators. IMO, a subverse should belong to its users. So, if someone is doing something that the users disagree with, then they are, by definition, a rogue moderator. The hard part is programmatically defining the users in a way that isn't subject to manipulation. If I had figured that part out, I would've posted something to /v/voatdev by now.
view the rest of the comments →
7558921? ago
Option 1. I came here for freedom of speech. I've got /v/niggers blocked, but I agree with the majority that they should be free to express their opinions.
With that said, rinse and repeat isn't sustainable. There needs to be some kind of process in place to define and handle rogue moderators. IMO, a subverse should belong to its users. So, if someone is doing something that the users disagree with, then they are, by definition, a rogue moderator. The hard part is programmatically defining the users in a way that isn't subject to manipulation. If I had figured that part out, I would've posted something to /v/voatdev by now.