THE CANARY IS NOT PRESSED. IT WAS NOT PRESSED IN THE WORLD-WIDE STANDARD 30 DAYS. (the user claiming to be puttitout subtly has stated that they press when they fucking feel like it with annoucements ((which renders canaries useless anyway)))
THIS ISN'T JESUS CANARY. DIES AND COMES BACK 3 DAYS LATER.
voat is served, our admins gagged
AND WORSE
NOW THEY'RE FORCING THEM TO LIE
which means only one thing goats: it's a National Security Letter forcing Voat's Admins to lie.* :(
@puttitout go make an annoucement thread about this PUBLICLY WITH YOUR NAME ON IT and i will remain open minded to your reasons that you present clearly and openly for missing the deadline when you and atko were on the day of and the day before the 30 days.
oh p.s. if you are @Puttitout whom you seem to be suggesting you are on this anon thread
you areletting clear defamation per se posts remain on voat.
clear defamation per se. delaware law breaking content.
and you've done nothing for over a week.
i consider your user agreement to be worth less than toilet paper at this point because you representatives of voat inc don't uphold the user agreement you wrote.
So, you are for taking someone to court for defamation for spouting on a free speech forum their opinion of what you have to say and the way you act? They said mean things, admins please do something about it they're not presenting an accurate viewpoint of me.
Read what you wrote. Read what I wrote. If you think I'm being intellectually dishonest, I can't help you. What if that someone lives in a foreign country? Would you extradite them to delaware? What if they're in another state? You can't be serious mate. This is not what the law was meant to be used for.
You made the claim you link to it I'm not going to waste my time looking something up for the likes of you.
So you want to silence and censor me is that it? Yeah I'm one of the people that replied to you earlier in this thread. You proclaim to be for free speech and no censorship while hypocritically turning the cheek and spreading bullshit about how you want the admins to deal with people for "defamation and libel"?
Wow you're so right, you go protect your "image" on the internet by prosecuting anyone who speaks negatively of you or says something untrue on the internet you're the hero we deserve keep fighting the good fight against censorship! (As you fucking advocate censoring people and being intellectually dishonest about it while projecting your attributes onto me).. Is that enough of the validation you seek? All the while you're a snake with your words deceiving people into thinking it's for a good and just cause.
And that's why I'm doing it in anon. Because if I were to try to say these truths and not be anonymous you and others like you would target me. You can't have someone pointing you out so you must identify and destroy them. This is really helping your cause.
view the rest of the comments →
7553481? ago
THE CANARY IS NOT PRESSED. IT WAS NOT PRESSED IN THE WORLD-WIDE STANDARD 30 DAYS. (the user claiming to be puttitout subtly has stated that they press when they fucking feel like it with annoucements ((which renders canaries useless anyway)))
THIS ISN'T JESUS CANARY. DIES AND COMES BACK 3 DAYS LATER.
voat is served, our admins gagged
AND WORSE
NOW THEY'RE FORCING THEM TO LIE
which means only one thing goats: it's a National Security Letter forcing Voat's Admins to lie.* :(
@puttitout go make an annoucement thread about this PUBLICLY WITH YOUR NAME ON IT and i will remain open minded to your reasons that you present clearly and openly for missing the deadline when you and atko were on the day of and the day before the 30 days.
7553537? ago
We never agreed to a 30 day deadline, we always said we'd update it on announcements only. There is no standard either.
You hijacking top comments ensures that I will not take you seriously. If you want respect, be respectful.
7555698? ago
oh p.s. if you are @Puttitout whom you seem to be suggesting you are on this anon thread
you areletting clear defamation per se posts remain on voat.
clear defamation per se. delaware law breaking content.
and you've done nothing for over a week.
i consider your user agreement to be worth less than toilet paper at this point because you representatives of voat inc don't uphold the user agreement you wrote.
what say you, supposed-admin?
7555772? ago
So, you are for taking someone to court for defamation for spouting on a free speech forum their opinion of what you have to say and the way you act? They said mean things, admins please do something about it they're not presenting an accurate viewpoint of me.
7555821? ago
you are too stupid to breathe.
read the user agreement. law breaking content is not allowed on voat.
there are civil defamy laws in delaware where voat is registered as a corporation.
no not mean things
they stated things as fact they knew not to be true to maliciously defame my reputation in public.
they don't need to use my name under delaware law.
literally too stupid to breathe.
7555880? ago
Read what you wrote. Read what I wrote. If you think I'm being intellectually dishonest, I can't help you. What if that someone lives in a foreign country? Would you extradite them to delaware? What if they're in another state? You can't be serious mate. This is not what the law was meant to be used for.
7556132? ago
i'll wait.
7556418? ago
You made the claim you link to it I'm not going to waste my time looking something up for the likes of you.
So you want to silence and censor me is that it? Yeah I'm one of the people that replied to you earlier in this thread. You proclaim to be for free speech and no censorship while hypocritically turning the cheek and spreading bullshit about how you want the admins to deal with people for "defamation and libel"?
Wow you're so right, you go protect your "image" on the internet by prosecuting anyone who speaks negatively of you or says something untrue on the internet you're the hero we deserve keep fighting the good fight against censorship! (As you fucking advocate censoring people and being intellectually dishonest about it while projecting your attributes onto me).. Is that enough of the validation you seek? All the while you're a snake with your words deceiving people into thinking it's for a good and just cause.
7556652? ago
get out of anon and shill all this disinfo and fallacy again.
i dare you.
7556685? ago
And that's why I'm doing it in anon. Because if I were to try to say these truths and not be anonymous you and others like you would target me. You can't have someone pointing you out so you must identify and destroy them. This is really helping your cause.
7556734? ago
i don't target shit. i speak freely and defend freedom of speech.
lol
no
i'm making the point that you're shilling anon because you're afraid to do it publicly
i'm welcoming you to have this conversation openly.
you have proven my point