While I follow a more free market approach to this, like the free market in the real world, once a product is established it becomes increasingly harder for a competitor to appear. Much like brand-name association, something becomes popular by name or reputation a replacement will never truly succeed (minus the very small handfull of cases where they do, those are the exceptions). That's like the CEO of Twitter establishing itself one way and then once it became the dominate platform to decide to start kicking everyone out because their "vision" changed, the CEO needs to be removed by the shareholders. Option 1 is the best course.
I for one wouldn't want the possibility of "raids" on subverses (people going there just to dismantle the sub by means of voting for someone who will dismantle it)
view the rest of the comments →
7553897? ago
I agree.
While I follow a more free market approach to this, like the free market in the real world, once a product is established it becomes increasingly harder for a competitor to appear. Much like brand-name association, something becomes popular by name or reputation a replacement will never truly succeed (minus the very small handfull of cases where they do, those are the exceptions). That's like the CEO of Twitter establishing itself one way and then once it became the dominate platform to decide to start kicking everyone out because their "vision" changed, the CEO needs to be removed by the shareholders. Option 1 is the best course.
7554728? ago
Mods should be elected by a community's subscribers
7556082? ago
I for one wouldn't want the possibility of "raids" on subverses (people going there just to dismantle the sub by means of voting for someone who will dismantle it)