Your Thoughts (announcements)
submitted 8.2 years ago by 1551024?
view the rest of the comments →
7553321? 8.2 years ago
...and it tarnishes burnishes Voat’s public image.
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
7555868? 8.2 years ago
It's definitely keeping voat from growing. Whether you think that's good or bad is up to you.
FWIW I support option 1 and simply blocked the sub.
7555984? 8.2 years ago
Currently, v/niggers may be keeping Voat from growing. But it may also prove to be Voat's true canary, as has been said many times before.
I think option 1 is best, option 2 has some merit, and option 3 is interesting, but only if that's what the v/niggers crowd wants.
This anonymous posting format will not be able to demonstrate the will of the minority/majority core of v/niggers.
view the rest of the comments →
7553321? ago
Voat is still acquiring its own public image. v/niggers does more than tarnish Voat. It's a defining characteristic of Voat's 'No Censorship and Freedom of Speech Model' and, by extension, Voat Inc.
7555868? ago
It's definitely keeping voat from growing. Whether you think that's good or bad is up to you.
FWIW I support option 1 and simply blocked the sub.
7555984? ago
Currently, v/niggers may be keeping Voat from growing. But it may also prove to be Voat's true canary, as has been said many times before.
I think option 1 is best, option 2 has some merit, and option 3 is interesting, but only if that's what the v/niggers crowd wants.
This anonymous posting format will not be able to demonstrate the will of the minority/majority core of v/niggers.