It is the only valid option. Investors should realize that the same majority that was ok with "grab 'em by the pussy" is ok with the existence of /v/niggers, and the only people who do have a problem with the existence of a /v/niggers are a very vocal, very disgusting, very repulsive, and very isolated minority. Most people prefer free speech to censorship. Most people are aware that social marxism is a toxic ideology, and the world is rapidly and increasingly resistant to SJW bullshit and economic terrorism. These investors you speak of would do well to ignore the cries of special snowflakes. History is moving forward and leaving these sycophants in the past. Anyone claiming /v/niggers is bad for business is flat out WRONG. Without free speech, there is nothing special about voat. Anyone who would like to invest in voat would recognize this as its only value, and would recognize how censoring /v/niggers would entirely eliminate that value - I honestly don't believe that there is any pressure from investors who wish to capitalize on voat's platform of free speech. If a so-called investor is putting that pressure on voat, then they are more likely just deep pockets who want to control the flow of information, and thusly, should be considered unfit for a role in the administration of voat.
view the rest of the comments →
7555930? ago
OPTION 1
It is the only valid option. Investors should realize that the same majority that was ok with "grab 'em by the pussy" is ok with the existence of /v/niggers, and the only people who do have a problem with the existence of a /v/niggers are a very vocal, very disgusting, very repulsive, and very isolated minority. Most people prefer free speech to censorship. Most people are aware that social marxism is a toxic ideology, and the world is rapidly and increasingly resistant to SJW bullshit and economic terrorism. These investors you speak of would do well to ignore the cries of special snowflakes. History is moving forward and leaving these sycophants in the past. Anyone claiming /v/niggers is bad for business is flat out WRONG. Without free speech, there is nothing special about voat. Anyone who would like to invest in voat would recognize this as its only value, and would recognize how censoring /v/niggers would entirely eliminate that value - I honestly don't believe that there is any pressure from investors who wish to capitalize on voat's platform of free speech. If a so-called investor is putting that pressure on voat, then they are more likely just deep pockets who want to control the flow of information, and thusly, should be considered unfit for a role in the administration of voat.