I agree with Option 1. We need to do whatever it takes to tell Reddit Trolls that they can't win here. If you delete the sub or let it fester and die then will claim victory. If you take it back from them they will say "we forced the admins to get involved!" which is a lot less to brag about.
we need to make it standard, with clear rules of engagement at the admin level ,and create a log for it all that's permanently publicly visible.
also
whoever posted this post is pretending to be an admin.
putt and atko have no reason to hide
(inb4 testing out new feature; "putt" tested it out a couple days ago in their test sub)
*REMEMBER EVERYONE: THERE WERE POSTS BY MANY USERS ON THE FRONT PAGE FOR DAYS THAT THE CANARY WAS DEAD AND THEY DIDN'T PRESS IT EVEN THOUGH BOTH ADMINS WERE ON; PUTTITOUT COMMENTED TO SANEGOAT AND ATKO CHANGED THE FEATURED SUB TO V/MUSEUMS. THEY WERE ON AND DID NOT PRESS IT. WHOMEVER THIS OP IS IS NOT OUR ADMINS; THIS IS PART OF THE ATTACK. THIS IS EXTREMELY DECEPTIVE AND ANYONE FALLING FOR IT DESERVES REDDIT NO VOAT FOR A WEEK AS PUNISHMENT. -GOATKU
thanks goatku! wow, that's interesting! so v/niggers getting wrecked twice and the v/videos ninja removal of mods for doing the job of the admins when the admins failed to do it.... is all a conspiracy to normalize admins having reddit cancer power over mods of non-default subs?! and do v/chicago and v/historyanecdotesv/thegrittypast fit into this?
MAYBE, SANEGOAT. THAT"S YET TO BE ESTABLISHED; CHICAGO COULD BE DISTRACTION MAYBE NOT; UNCONFIRMED; @LOCKEPROPOSAL HAS LONG BEEN SJW CANCER. YOU CAN SEE ON HIS REDDIT PAGE ARCHIVES AND HIS STEAM PROFILE LINKS.
thanks goatku!
(P.S. check the nested comments below to see fake @puttitout doing a hit and run disinfo with a personal attack and a bonus fallacy!)
Putt has one comment in this chain and it's completely reasonable. Being upset about the canary is one thing, but what you are doing is intellectually dishonest, especially when you have still not accepted that a 30 day limit was never agreed to, and that the admins have not actually done anything wrong at all with regards to the canary.
view the rest of the comments →
7553651? ago
I agree with Option 1. We need to do whatever it takes to tell Reddit Trolls that they can't win here. If you delete the sub or let it fester and die then will claim victory. If you take it back from them they will say "we forced the admins to get involved!" which is a lot less to brag about.
7553975? ago
i agree with you.
i'm sane goat
we need to make it standard, with clear rules of engagement at the admin level ,and create a log for it all that's permanently publicly visible.
also
whoever posted this post is pretending to be an admin.
putt and atko have no reason to hide
(inb4 testing out new feature; "putt" tested it out a couple days ago in their test sub)
*REMEMBER EVERYONE: THERE WERE POSTS BY MANY USERS ON THE FRONT PAGE FOR DAYS THAT THE CANARY WAS DEAD AND THEY DIDN'T PRESS IT EVEN THOUGH BOTH ADMINS WERE ON; PUTTITOUT COMMENTED TO SANEGOAT AND ATKO CHANGED THE FEATURED SUB TO V/MUSEUMS. THEY WERE ON AND DID NOT PRESS IT. WHOMEVER THIS OP IS IS NOT OUR ADMINS; THIS IS PART OF THE ATTACK. THIS IS EXTREMELY DECEPTIVE AND ANYONE FALLING FOR IT DESERVES REDDIT NO VOAT FOR A WEEK AS PUNISHMENT. -GOATKU
thanks goatku! wow, that's interesting! so v/niggers getting wrecked twice and the v/videos ninja removal of mods for doing the job of the admins when the admins failed to do it.... is all a conspiracy to normalize admins having reddit cancer power over mods of non-default subs?! and do v/chicago and v/historyanecdotes v/thegrittypast fit into this?
MAYBE, SANEGOAT. THAT"S YET TO BE ESTABLISHED; CHICAGO COULD BE DISTRACTION MAYBE NOT; UNCONFIRMED; @LOCKEPROPOSAL HAS LONG BEEN SJW CANCER. YOU CAN SEE ON HIS REDDIT PAGE ARCHIVES AND HIS STEAM PROFILE LINKS.
thanks goatku!
(P.S. check the nested comments below to see fake @puttitout doing a hit and run disinfo with a personal attack and a bonus fallacy!)
7555095? ago
Putt has one comment in this chain and it's completely reasonable. Being upset about the canary is one thing, but what you are doing is intellectually dishonest, especially when you have still not accepted that a 30 day limit was never agreed to, and that the admins have not actually done anything wrong at all with regards to the canary.
7555535? ago
come at me with fact and reason not lies and reason