I'd say go with option 2. That way it becomes self regulating and requires less intervention from the admins. If you go with option 1 people will expect you to step up again in the future. This way you can only lose in the long term as your decisions are sure to piss of at least one group of people. Basically: let this shit sort itself out.
Which I think was a mistake. These are not decisions to make lightly and if it becomes common to solve these problems like this the admins will have to spend more and more time on this in the future (time which I think they don't have and can spend much better).
view the rest of the comments →
7553201? ago
I'd say go with option 2. That way it becomes self regulating and requires less intervention from the admins. If you go with option 1 people will expect you to step up again in the future. This way you can only lose in the long term as your decisions are sure to piss of at least one group of people. Basically: let this shit sort itself out.
7553239? ago
they did 1. already with this exact same sub before.
7553337? ago
Which I think was a mistake. These are not decisions to make lightly and if it becomes common to solve these problems like this the admins will have to spend more and more time on this in the future (time which I think they don't have and can spend much better).
7553386? ago
@atko @puttitout you should hire my ass for no pay as a independent pro-bono contractor for public relations.
this is where i and my friends stand for free speech.