You have to establish your status as a victim. If the Credit Union is a closed private fund with no recourse to public monies, you will probably fail.
The sale of the house should pay off any mortgage. If several mortgages have been taken out on the same property at same time, there will likely be a shortfall. My assumption is that the multi mortgages were sequential - only one mortgage outstanding at any one time for less than the value of the house. The CU should have done due diligence.
Dave Acton is Acting Out22 hours ago
NOW COMES THE MOVANT, George Webb, to MOTION this Court for permissive intervention in this instant action. Movant is a tax payer that has subsidized the losses incurred by the Congressional Federal Credit Union (herein CFCU). Pursuant to Rule 24(b) of the Fed.R.Civ.Proc. this Court can allow permissive intervention. George Webb offer's evidence to demonstrate significant malice and aforethought by the defendants to gather CFCU funds for the purposes of supporting terror organizations in contravention to several U.S. federal laws and statutes. Further, Webb, is an expert on the issues related to equipment known to be in the possession of the defendants that was misappropriated from Congressional offices. The totality of evidence to be presented by Webb indicates that the defendants intended to acquire these funds from the CFCU to flee the United States and join their operatives in a terror organization.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL
2
Obviously, the result is different if defendants seek C
ontrol Component’s documents on some other basis. See
Reply, pp. 7-
8.)
3
The Court find that any separate burden argument is subsumed
with the custody and control issues. Whatever Control
Components, Inc.’s obligations are under the Plea Agreement,
Control Components cannot claim that they are burdensome,
particularly given the sophisticated clients and
counsel involved in negotiating the Plea Agreement.
CR-11 (09/98)
CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 2 of 3
I.
Initial
Matters.
First, the Court rejects the contention that Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, governing intervention in civil actions, controls here. The right of intervention in a criminal
proceeding is much more circumscribed, and is generally limited to attorney client issues. United
States
v.
Bergonzi
, 216 F.R.D. 487, 492-93 (N.D. Cal.). As the court in United
States
v.
Carmichael
,
342 F. Supp 2d 1070, 1072 (M.D. Al. 2004), summarized:
Intervention in criminal cases is generally limited to those instances in which a third
party's constitutional or other federal rights are implicated by the resolution of a particular
motion, request, or other issue during the course of a criminal case. For example, courts
sometimes permit the press to intervene in a criminal case where a decision to close
criminal proceedings to the public may affect its First Amendment rights. In addition,
third parties are occasionally allowed to intervene in a criminal trial to challenge a request or other issue during the course of a criminal case. For example, courts
sometimes permit the press to intervene in a criminal case where a decision to close
criminal proceedings to the public may affect its First Amendment rights. In addition,
third parties are occasionally allowed to intervene in a criminal trial to challenge a request
for the production of documents on the ground of privilege ,or to protect other rights implicated by a particular proceeding
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL
4 See cases cited by Control Components at page 9 of its Reply.
5 Those views are partially set forth in Control Components’ Reply, and as noted in text, Control Components ought to have a full opportunity to state its position. (Reply, pp. 3-4.) CR-11 (09/98) CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 3 of 3 Supp. 909, 912 (W.D. Tex. 1997) (unindicted co-conspirator denied intervention). The Court finds that Control Components has no standing to litigate the Government’s basic obligation to comply with Rule 16 and its obligations under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Compare 28 U.S.C. 547(1), (2) (Duties). Willful misrepresentation by officers employed by that Department is actionable under the McDade Act, 28 U.S.C. 530B (Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government).
A private Citizen may move a federal court on behalf of the United States ex relatione. United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955).
Joanie Detlefsen Searching my mind to remember when a location was found that the server was suspected to be in. Felt like around Manassas, VA it was a building I thought that had no other businesses. The only other was something to do with children and that captured me. On closer look it appeared to be autistic children. I even downloaded 2 pictures used of children because I thought they were also used elsewhere. And it had Betsy DeVos in a picture. I wrote some tweets that maybe twitter never even sent out. I felt very shadowbanned after that. I just deleted the pictures of the kids finally. So that made me remember it that it must be on the Trello board. Because this server is so elusive. Anyway, now I'm distracted and distraught over the Geshundeit Institute. And did Robin Williams know? This late stuff is bad because I'm half asleep and take in only so much, dual tasking, etc etc. That said, the picture of the building made me think I knew the area and that could be why I say Manassas. Plus Betsy DeVos could have simply been placed in the marketing photos. I'm trying to remember if it was before Zanesville or after.
Joanie Detlefsen Hah. Glad you asked, I reversed my search -re , re-search, and found the org. Daytime when time, this is the org, now where its building is, is the one the Awan's had an office for the server, that's how I heard it. https://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/SpEd%2520Topics/International/Developing_Early_Childhood_Intervention_Services.pdf, Virginia.
306.2 yt comment
Karen Omodt Pan-Galactic Plenipotentiary ... I read Trish Twitter feed today and she calls George a liar, con man and asswipe. Why the sudden change in her demeanor?
306.3 livechat
Melissa HChecked ALL their twits @MAGA 12 - the only clues that something happened are the tweets to Trish asking what happened, why'd she tell Gdub to go F himself, etc.
Silverlining ago
Day 307 Thursday August 24 2017
https://voat.co/v/WebbWatch/2086368#submissionTop
Day 305 Tuesday August 22 2017
https://voat.co/v/WebbWatch/2081025
Silverlining ago
SilverSpecials
Complete B of Joy lecture 2016 with Eng Subs - De Blije B lezing Ronald Bernard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=457akZFYnHo
https://bofjoy.net/why/
Silverlining ago
Awan Intervention
This looks to be your best bet: Dave's intervention is under Civil Proceedure Rules, which do not apply as far as I can see.
https://www.federalrulesofcriminalprocedure.org/title-ix/rule-60-victims-rights/
You have to establish your status as a victim. If the Credit Union is a closed private fund with no recourse to public monies, you will probably fail.
The sale of the house should pay off any mortgage. If several mortgages have been taken out on the same property at same time, there will likely be a shortfall. My assumption is that the multi mortgages were sequential - only one mortgage outstanding at any one time for less than the value of the house. The CU should have done due diligence.
https://www.congressionalfcu.org/ [is this the one?]
The Longworth branch will be closed from Wednesday, July 26 through Monday, September 4
https://www.congressionalfcu.org/about/contact/longworth-branch-renovation
The Federal Credit Union Act https://www.ncua.gov/Legal/Documents/fcu_act.pdf
Dave Acton is Acting Out22 hours ago NOW COMES THE MOVANT, George Webb, to MOTION this Court for permissive intervention in this instant action. Movant is a tax payer that has subsidized the losses incurred by the Congressional Federal Credit Union (herein CFCU). Pursuant to Rule 24(b) of the Fed.R.Civ.Proc. this Court can allow permissive intervention. George Webb offer's evidence to demonstrate significant malice and aforethought by the defendants to gather CFCU funds for the purposes of supporting terror organizations in contravention to several U.S. federal laws and statutes. Further, Webb, is an expert on the issues related to equipment known to be in the possession of the defendants that was misappropriated from Congressional offices. The totality of evidence to be presented by Webb indicates that the defendants intended to acquire these funds from the CFCU to flee the United States and join their operatives in a terror organization.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_24
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intervention_(law)#United_States
https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/legacy/2013/05/06/10-13-09carson-intervene.pdf
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL 2 Obviously, the result is different if defendants seek C ontrol Component’s documents on some other basis. See Reply, pp. 7- 8.) 3 The Court find that any separate burden argument is subsumed with the custody and control issues. Whatever Control Components, Inc.’s obligations are under the Plea Agreement, Control Components cannot claim that they are burdensome, particularly given the sophisticated clients and counsel involved in negotiating the Plea Agreement. CR-11 (09/98) CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 3 I. Initial Matters. First, the Court rejects the contention that Rule 24 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, governing intervention in civil actions, controls here. The right of intervention in a criminal proceeding is much more circumscribed, and is generally limited to attorney client issues. United States v. Bergonzi , 216 F.R.D. 487, 492-93 (N.D. Cal.). As the court in United States v. Carmichael , 342 F. Supp 2d 1070, 1072 (M.D. Al. 2004), summarized: Intervention in criminal cases is generally limited to those instances in which a third party's constitutional or other federal rights are implicated by the resolution of a particular motion, request, or other issue during the course of a criminal case. For example, courts sometimes permit the press to intervene in a criminal case where a decision to close criminal proceedings to the public may affect its First Amendment rights. In addition, third parties are occasionally allowed to intervene in a criminal trial to challenge a request or other issue during the course of a criminal case. For example, courts sometimes permit the press to intervene in a criminal case where a decision to close criminal proceedings to the public may affect its First Amendment rights. In addition, third parties are occasionally allowed to intervene in a criminal trial to challenge a request for the production of documents on the ground of privilege ,or to protect other rights implicated by a particular proceeding
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL 4 See cases cited by Control Components at page 9 of its Reply.
5 Those views are partially set forth in Control Components’ Reply, and as noted in text, Control Components ought to have a full opportunity to state its position. (Reply, pp. 3-4.) CR-11 (09/98) CRIMINAL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 3 of 3 Supp. 909, 912 (W.D. Tex. 1997) (unindicted co-conspirator denied intervention). The Court finds that Control Components has no standing to litigate the Government’s basic obligation to comply with Rule 16 and its obligations under Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963)
Bankruptcy [not relevant here that can see]
http://www.jonesday.com/Defining-the-Unconditional-Right-to-Intervene-04-02-2003/
http://www.jonesday.com/expanding-the-unconditional-right-to-intervene/
http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/meredith/intervention.htm
Compare 28 U.S.C. 547(1), (2) (Duties). Willful misrepresentation by officers employed by that Department is actionable under the McDade Act, 28 U.S.C. 530B (Ethical standards for attorneys for the Government).
A private Citizen may move a federal court on behalf of the United States ex relatione. United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (1955).
https://www.federalrulesofcriminalprocedure.org/
https://www.federalrulesofcriminalprocedure.org/title-ix/rule-60-victims-rights/
http://www.publiclawproject.org.uk/data/resources/120/PLP_2008_Guide_3rd_Party_Interventions.pdf [UK]
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2014/45.html R(Das) EWCA Civ 45
Silverlining ago
Day 307 Thursday August 24 2017
https://voat.co/v/WebbWatch/2086368#submissionTop
Day 305 Tuesday August 22 2017
https://voat.co/v/WebbWatch/2081025
Silverlining ago
SilverNotes
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4803884/Pictured-Dem-aide-charged-fraud-hacking-probe.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Puppet_Masters
Silverlining ago
yt comment 306.1
Joanie Detlefsen Searching my mind to remember when a location was found that the server was suspected to be in. Felt like around Manassas, VA it was a building I thought that had no other businesses. The only other was something to do with children and that captured me. On closer look it appeared to be autistic children. I even downloaded 2 pictures used of children because I thought they were also used elsewhere. And it had Betsy DeVos in a picture. I wrote some tweets that maybe twitter never even sent out. I felt very shadowbanned after that. I just deleted the pictures of the kids finally. So that made me remember it that it must be on the Trello board. Because this server is so elusive. Anyway, now I'm distracted and distraught over the Geshundeit Institute. And did Robin Williams know? This late stuff is bad because I'm half asleep and take in only so much, dual tasking, etc etc. That said, the picture of the building made me think I knew the area and that could be why I say Manassas. Plus Betsy DeVos could have simply been placed in the marketing photos. I'm trying to remember if it was before Zanesville or after.
Joanie Detlefsen Hah. Glad you asked, I reversed my search -re , re-search, and found the org. Daytime when time, this is the org, now where its building is, is the one the Awan's had an office for the server, that's how I heard it. https://www.cec.sped.org/~/media/Files/SpEd%2520Topics/International/Developing_Early_Childhood_Intervention_Services.pdf, Virginia.
306.2 yt comment
Karen Omodt Pan-Galactic Plenipotentiary ... I read Trish Twitter feed today and she calls George a liar, con man and asswipe. Why the sudden change in her demeanor?
306.3 livechat
Melissa HChecked ALL their twits @MAGA 12 - the only clues that something happened are the tweets to Trish asking what happened, why'd she tell Gdub to go F himself, etc.
@trishadishes twitters http://archive.is/f6ll5 [mostly cleared now, it woud seem]
Jason's explanation https://voat.co/v/CrowdSourcetheTruth/2081392/10269730