You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Tallest_Skil ago

Old code wouldn't use enough resources

How is this even a sentence. Why would this ever be anything anyone would WANT?

Also, have any of you ever read a UX guideline? That stupid fucking WIGGLE when you hover over a name INCREASES TIME between initiation and access of information, because you have to wait until it stops animating to read it.

PuttItOut ago

Deleting this comment. It was dickish and I regret it.

Tallest_Skil ago

Why would you want code to use MORE resources? Why would you want your UX to be worse and not better? Superfluous animations don’t help anyone.

Who are “they”? Prove wrong a single thing I’ve said.

PuttItOut ago

With software you often just trade one problem for another. Old code wouldn't use enough resources, this code uses too much.

They are both problems, hence no one would want either. Using too few resources isn't a good thing (whole list of other problems that you don't seem to know exist). Anything on an extreme is not ideal.

INCREASES TIME between initiation and access of information

Animation is after server response, has nothing to do with increasing time.

It's funny, the animation seems to annoy the most annoying, think it will stay.

SearchVoatBot ago

This comment was linked from this v/voatdev submission by @forget-me-not.

Posted automatically (#55361) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here. (@PuttItOut: Click here to suppress your crosslink notifications from @forget-me-not)

bosunmoon ago

I can except that I'm annoying, but the most annoying? Do you even browse Voat? @Puttitout

Tallest_Skil ago

purposely designing the site poorly for kicks

K, I’ll just use custom CSS. Be a little coward, then.