You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

gabara ago

I'm steering clear of QRV, but in fairness, QRV is set as NSFW so if users want to post legal NSFW there, I don't see a problem. It's not my fault the QRV mods suck. When they came here I warned them about that NSFW flag combined with anon.

Recyclops14 ago

I don't get this idea of voat wanting or even calling for moderation. Its why most of us are even here in the first place because of over moderation. This site was nice 2-3 years ago, now you're all calling for mods. wtf

TestForScience ago

A massive wave of new users joins Voat.
They begin posting non-related bullshit and propaganda, downvoating absolutely everyone that isn’t them, and soon, everything you can see on Voat, regardless of your sorting filter, is nothing but them.
Still no mods?

Recyclops14 ago

What users are you talking about? What specific example are you talking about or are you posing a hypothetical?

TestForScience ago

To the full extent, it’s a hypothetical.
However, it has been proven in smaller sizes several times.
The TD migration that lasted a couple weeks,
The initial Q migration, taking a little more than a month to settle down a bit,
The v/aww purge,
And now, the mass bans.

Recyclops14 ago

The_D didn't last very long everyone(voat) instantly got on the defense so there was that, q guys just put it in anon and stayed to their sub, I don't remember much about the /aww purge I think they were spamming gore or porn, so they got banned.. The mass bans? he just said he was a mistake from poor code. So none of those were really worth getting putt involved. If the sub has rules they get to enforce them as is their right(like v/aww did), trying to enforce rules on a sub because of a hecklers veto isn't moderation. Just my 2 cents.

TestForScience ago

The Q people tried branching out very heavily at first, mass upvoating each other to be able to post unlimitedly, thus, gaming the system.
The aww thing brought out BS just like the content of the post that we're commenting on right now, with people getting all shitty about being told to follow the VERY few rules that we have.
Saying 'a hecklers veto' downplays the amount and severity of the multiple people starting all this shit, dude.

Recyclops14 ago

Yeah they tried to game the system because they wanted to post, got shit on then put it in anon. I didn't get involved too much into the v/aww shit I wasn't really concerned with all the retarded drama by that point. I don't believe saying hecklers veto really downplays it mainly because putt only responded because people were messaging him a lot about it. I feel like we have some sufficient protections in order thats what v/protectvoat is for. What more do people want?