On QRV.... | Voat

submitted 5.8 years ago by PuttItOut

I literally couldn't care less about QRV. Zero. Nada.

Here is a run down on the QRV situation. Lot of rumors.

I was receiving and annoyingly large volume of PMs from sweet innocent people that have had their world shaken by some of the abuse.

Had great relationships with QRV mods so far, but noticed that all the mods I've ever talked with weren't there this time. These new mods were all under 15 CCP, some at zero. Weird. Figured they have no idea how to mod, figured switching out of anon so the users could block the spammers was the easiest solution to decrease the abuse, so I decided to send a message to the subverse mods suggesting switching.

They threw me under the bus. PM chain they posted

Now I'm threatening to deplatform them apparently. 

This is Reddit 2.0 they declare!

I don't have time for this.

I sent them a follow up PM a day or two later being nice (They won't screen shot that one).

And that is the real QRV story.

Sunday Sticky Day! And sorry @heygeorge

516 comments

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

TheBuddha 5.8 years ago

Might it be worth considering that moderation permissions require x-amount of both CCP and SCP?

link

Intrixina 5.8 years ago

This is a great idea.

link

Caveman_in_a_suit 5.8 years ago

That's a pretty good idea

link

think- 5.8 years ago

I second that.

@Sandhog @shewhomustbeobeyed @Madworld @PeaceSeeker

link

shewhomustbeobeyed 5.8 years ago

I don't get any of this.

Why does it matter?

link

think- 5.8 years ago

If a certain amount of ccp and scp would be required for people who want to mod, we could prevent that total newbies who are not familiar with Voat can become mods.

link

shewhomustbeobeyed 5.8 years ago

Who in their right mind would want to mod? Crazy bastards. I've seen the shit you went through, the shit others go through.

link

SandHog 5.8 years ago

I agree. Otherwise shitty mods can just hand subs off to their alts and nothing changes. I think that is likely what happened in this instance. They could still do that with a ccp/scp requirement but it would take some more effort on their part and they would have to participate, at least.