There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
Samsquamch ago
Putt isn't the person to take up this fight, but I really wish these people who "formally contacted" Voat had their requests were made public.
It needs to be clear they are applying this authority evenly and fairly, something that government oversight should have no problems proving. If you want one group to stop making threats, you have to also make sure they aren't being threatened by other groups.
To be clear, I'm not advocating violence - I think it's stupid to make threats of violence on the internet, and even more idiotic that others feel it needs to be policed, but this Nanny state is where we are.
PuttItOut ago
I have no problem making requests public, not in the least. Unless I'm strongly advised not to do so, I will.
89753jklsdfklas ago
look putt... there is a reason i had to do what i did... yet those people are unpunished... but yet you didn't give two shits about banning me
i just lost another account last downvoated from shit night to them......
im willing to overlook it, i dont hold grudges, i understand that your trying your best.... i get it... but you have to too look at the root of cause.
it wasnt me, i have never resticted a users free speck... but evidently you have
PuttItOut ago
What?
NotHereForPizza ago
So... had I seen this guy's comments I'd have tried to specifically alter the comments I've made today to specifically look as different as I could make it from this guy's comments.
For the record, they've tried to say I'm him before and I'm not.