There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
Conspirologist ago
I am really desperate to read between the lines of this post. As far as I understand, Voat is slipping under the control of some not disclosed investors, who want to make it become like Reddit. Correct me if I am wrong.
PuttItOut ago
Voat can't become Reddit, what's the point? We stand for the exact opposite. Posts like this are intended to share a potential problem regarding Voat's future and to hopefully avoid these problem areas.
It's true that even a good can be abused, and often Free Speech falls into the category.
We abuse it, we lose it. Let's just not do this.
NotHereForPizza ago
I hate to break it to you but sorting comments based on popularity essentially is Voat.
This is why, for instance, QRV is anon. I hope you understand what I'm saying to you.