There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
HostileTakeover ago
If you've missed the memo,
Leftists' violence is free speech And Rightwing speech is violence
Anything will be taken by SJW faggots to imply violence. Where will you stop? At Reddit 2.0?
fujin ago
SJWs do take everything to imply violence but it's not the same as what law enforcement sees as a "call to arms" which is not protected under the first amendment. It's pretty clear what's free speech and what's not.
The microscope is currently on libertarian/free thinkers/conservatives, life isn't fair or balanced so be smarter than libards that get away with shit talk (at the moment), they'll have their day in the sun.
Witsend ago
How is it that we are required to be an armed militia if and when our government moves to overly and unlawfully control us, yet we are not allowed to call for a move to arms? <-- rhetoric. Keep an eye out for winks and nods.
enormousatom ago
If you're going to stage a coup, you better fucking win. Being executed as a traitor severely reduces your chances of being alive.
Witsend ago
I'd rather die on my feet . . .