There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
PuttItOut ago
Yes.
EdSnowden ago
Would you mind updating the warrant canary?
VicariousJambi ago
Isn't the point of the canary to tell us if he cant talk about it?
EdSnowden ago
It’s to prove to us he hasn’t been served a warrant or gag order without telling us anything. It’s concerning that he now admits he’s been contacted by at least one US agency but hasn’t updated the canary.
VicariousJambi ago
With the gag order I'd be surprised if he could mention anything at all. The fact that he can tells me theres no gag order.
But, yeah. 100% update the canary anyways just to be sure. Its suspect if he doesn't do it after doing an announcement like this, just common sense.
heygeorge ago
The canary has been clearly dead since the black rifle coffee takedown request.
Caveman_in_a_suit ago
I should mail them a dead canary with a complaint letter attached.
heygeorge ago
So long as this is satire, I think it’s fair to say
Caveman_in_a_suit ago
Oh, yessir absolutely satire
Everything I say on this site, should be considered satire
Except the parts where I bitch and moan about @gabara eating several Japanese towns and cities, that's the absolute truth of how I feel. He's ruining the worldwide kelp industry!
gabara ago
The kelp was dressed slutty.
watts2db ago
that and the gab.ai thing with the f' your optics guy
lordvain2 ago
Yep, it was about then thimgs changed.
AmaleksHairyAss ago
This contact almost certainly isn't in the form of a warrant or gag order. And therefore should be posted immediately.