There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
Grumpy_Old_Man ago
A lot of Voat users simply need to grow and stop acting like edgy children.
varialus ago
The kids just want to know to what degree they're allowed to be edgy. There are lots of requests for clarifications in this thread but I'm not seeing any attempts to answer them. A common phrase on Voat which I'm not advocating is "Gas the kikes. Race war now!" I'm legitimately curious whether this constitutes a threat. If Putt can't clarify then I respectfully request that he have his lawyer clarify it in layman terms so we all can be clear just what does and what doesn't constitute a threat, not because I'm interested in towing that line but because goats regularly make comments along the whole spectrum and by not clarifying, a chilling effect is created wherein folks might sensor themselves out of fear of being targeted by the authorities when what they had wanted to say was actually harmless. If Putt doesn't want to censor us, he really should more clearly define where this vague line is.
The_Prophets_Profit ago
If you niggers start censoring yourselves I'm going back to the chans.