There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
Camulos ago
And it begins lol
What faggotry is this?
PuttItOut ago
We always err on the side of not removing any content (don't even remember when I last did) but things are getting hot and it's important we understand this as a community.
WhitePaladin ago
Whats the name of the investitor Putt ?
YouAreASlave ago
Shylock Shekelgruber
Kalergi ago
Black Rifle Coffee
Hand_of_Node ago
Why do you believe Putt would betray an investor?
toobaditworks ago
No Putt is the owner.
ardvarcus ago
Oh, come on now. We all knew Voat wasn't going to last. We're actually able to say what we think here -- nobody thought the liberal cunts who control the media were going to allow that for much longer, did they? Face it, we don't have freedom of speech anywhere in the world these days, not even in America. White Christians are under determined, sustained attack, and the left has no intention of letting us band together as a people.
european ago
I doubt it's "the left" which are the problem. "Just follow the money" is a phrase that springs to mind. The world is too complex also to make it a left right thing all the time. Dumbing down real issues to the level of wwf/wwe wrestling match springs to mind. No one can know who is sincere and who is being sarcastic and ironic or just stirring either.
MrDarkWater ago
maybe the investor IS the "US Agency"
european ago
I wonder if china is involved?