There has been an increasing number of content that is bordering or crossing the lines concerning making "threats." So much so that we have been formally contacted regarding some content. We are better than this.
I'm not a lawyer, and you're not a lawyer, and it isn't Voat's place to defend illegal content. We don't have a staff to review content and don't have a team of lawyers dedicated to deciding what is and isn't lawful. I'm not also into endlessly debating what is and isn't legal as subjects like this often devolve into when everyone at the party is an "internet expert."
We have to deal with this issue and if content is in the grey area, we are going to remove it upon request. We also have to cooperate with law enforcement, I hope everyone fully understands that we are not attempting to operate outside of the law. Voat's purpose is to provide a collusion and censorship free place for discussion, not taking on a government.
It's easy to avoid this entire area: Word content maturely, avoid implicit and explicit language concerning the involvement of violence and the content won't be in question. Simple, so very simple.
After this post there will most likely be "users" testing this line and hoping we remove their content in order to claim censorship on Voat. This is just how things like this work. Don't fall for this Voat. It would be simply incredible if we just worked together on this instead of the typical shit storm posts like this usually generate.
As a reminder: Voat is for your personal, lawful use. See it here: https://voat.co/help/useragreement
That's all. Thanks for reading. Carry on.
Edit:
ProTip: I decided to post this before anything legal would prevent me from doing so. I have a feeling I know where this is going to lead.
I've also updated the canary to reflect this as well (this may be the last time that little guy gets an update, we will just have to wait and see).
view the rest of the comments →
Y8goKTH959VCLKty8xIz ago
Gas the Jews isn’t allowed anymore?
markrod420 ago
Not nearly specific enough to constitute a legal threat id imagine.
uvulectomy ago
It would have to be calling for "imminent lawless action" and also be "likely to incite or produce such an action."
See: Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
gabara ago
And you're not allowed to deny the Holocause or eat anything but Chinese food on New Years day.
facepaint ago
That six million figure seems a little inflated to me. I think they may be boosting their numbers.
CameraCode0 ago
It's Chinese food on Christmas day, because all Christian places are closed it's the only place Jews can eat.
captainstrange ago
I highly fucking doubt that.
If you want to eat chinese food you don't need an excuse. Just fucking eat chinese food.
VoatIsNowDead ago
I like shopping. Lolz. Anything but consumerism and moronic television is hate speech. I love the new voat. v/promocodes is my favssss
BB-3 ago
That's not even a real subverse...
VoatIsNowDead ago
Yes this place only became Reddit v2.0 tonight give it some time and it will be.