Today we banned vote manipulators and reset their votes. As cache expires, the accounts targeted will have their point totals adjusted appropriately.
You will likely recognize many of the names now on the ban list. Some I have mixed feelings about as I considered them fun to have around or an asset to Voat as a whole, but objectively, there was no question as to their abuse and manipulation, and for this reason we had no choice but to respond to all abuse with the ban hammer.
@Cynabuns and I have finalized a new system for more efficient processing of vote manipulation bans and going forward we will be reviewing manipulation more regularly. We don't plan on allowing the hammer to gather dust any longer.
We did not send warnings today like we usually do for those in the gray area. If we come across your name again, you will be banned. Fair warning. It's not worth it.
If you feel you have been targeted by vote manipulation please PM me so I can research as we are dealing with a mountain of data when reviewing bans.
To those banned:
I personally don't judge your actions, but you know as well as I do what you were doing. Vote manipulation can not continue going unchecked and for the sake of integrity you got the hammer. If you want to create a new account and forgo the manipulation, you are welcome back. If not, I'll ban you again (and again and again). The thing you don't realize is when I ban you, I am resetting your votes against your target(s), so there is no point in continuing with these ways.
P.S. Now vote manipulators get a shiny new badge so everyone knows that they've been bad little goats. :)
P.P.S. The ban reasons in the ban log are wonky because if a user had multiple infractions, we only used the first description. In addition, the target in the description may be the banned user (which doesn't make sense) as many of these bans resulted in both users (vote farmers) being banned and the code simply reused the same description for each ban.
Banned user log:
https://voat.co/log/banned/user
view the rest of the comments →
Dismember ago
Well looking at the accounts on the ban list, SBBH has a bloody nose as well. Look at this for example: https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/2926813/15735062
Let's see if Voat is serious about it or being selective.
heygeorge ago
I believe that thread (@cynabuns, please see above as some of these users are showing up as active) and another one insulting @nadeshda were jumped into at a slightly later time, once the newness wore off and people weren’t commenting. All it takes is one user to ignore a random comment, and then once the thread is over the manipulator can take over and no one would even notice.
Unless you’re insinuating that @thebuddha is vote farming! Lol
Cynabuns ago
Active? I thought I saw only numbers - did I not go deeply enough into the post? Let me know
heygeorge ago
The account names are numbers (without questions marks) in order to obfuscate. It seems to have worked!
Cynabuns ago
Indeed it did! That's what I get for looking at stuff past my bedtime LOL!
I'm on it :)
heygeorge ago
Check our the thread antagonizing @nadeshda, too, if you haven’t yet. It’s the same sort of set-up. My interpretation is that whomever it is decided to take advantage of SBBH ‘regulars’ being used to receiving non-sensical comment notifications and ignoring them. In one of the threads, they insinuated automation via a comment. Unfortunately, at this point, it’s possible the upvotes given/received were only within its own circle which may complicate discernment.
Nadeshda ago
Yip I found it, didn’t leave much of an impression at the time and missed the comments after that were farming. Nice catch George!
Here is the link @cynabuns
https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/2926474
Cynabuns ago
Perfect - tanks!
MadWorld ago
Those were the same usernames found in another thread https://voat.co/v/AskVoat/2926813/15735062/
List: https://voat.co/v/Voat/3065088/17065005