Should be stickied.

Thanks its really helpful

I oppose this. Don't implement it.

I think it would be better if we:

1) appoint, on a rotating basis of members, an executive officer for a period of a week time who would decide on matters through such a system; then

2) at a special bi-weekly meeting the members as a whole vote to ratify the supreme leader's choice in which:

2a) in the case of purely internal affairs, a simple majority to decide to ratify the leader's decision or

2b) in the case of external affairs, a 2/3rds majority

"newbie"

don't make me whip out my 4 year old alts

oh wait I'm not a fag c:

How's that list coming along? Maybe time for a repost.

This is huge power.

I think you should give this power only to @gabara and let's see what happens next.

Definetly down to try it.

We still need you at our helm though, please. It would be ideal, if your stamp of approval was required on important issues. It would be more like, advising you rather than giving us final say.

alts are for fags

How many votes

could a Voat goat vote

If a Voat goat could vote Voat?

I was under the impression that that this feature would make it possible for the users to overthrow a censoring tyrant mod. What's there to stop a mod from just setting a sub to private to prevent the community from being able to vote them out?

Have you seen this post - @Vindicator @Crensch @EricKaliberhall @srayzie @Shizy ?

This seems like a bunch of jew wizardry words i hope things keeps working around here.

I would like to request the "Toggle Night Mode" button label be changed to "Toggle Nigger Mode".

I enjoy your website and I feel this would further enhance my experience here. Thank you for your time.

Who gives a damn. Ive already conceded to the fact that ill never get to upload/influence any content on this shit site because i dont follow the retard circlejerk.

Fuck the users on here that think that they are so smart. Fuck all the users that use it for spreading their shit propaganda. And most of all fuck all of the pewdiefag promoters that cone here. You are all gutter trash that deserve nothing more than being sterilized.

Not that it matters since @puttitout fucked this site up by selling it to (((investor))).

This sounds pretty impressive as far as community governance/voting systems go, but I fear we're still imposing the limitations of physical spaces onto non-physical communities by focusing so much on the idea of centralized control, even if it is democratic or governed by some sort of constitution.

Interesting to see that Republic is an option, but I still think the right path forward is empowering individuals rather than modeling meat space models of controlling people to manage scarcity that need not be a factor online.

Regardless, still curious to see what happens and commend you for clearly putting a lot of thought into such a governance system.

i use dial as a punching bag, and ive told putt to look into the downvoats on this account when he has the time.

Would love to see who is behind the downvotes, if they are not organic. Votes on your recent comments seem normal.

I experiment on voat to what kind of reactions i get in comments. you'd be surprised.... its how i have fun here

Maybe create a subverse documenting your experience and share that with people?

no i aint no fucking rat, but ive caught them... and we've conversed.

XD So you are a messenger of the rats?

i can see it a million miles away, but no one believes me because i've given dial the persona of a drunken village idiot.

And you have many other personas? Got it.

and FUCK YOU arch enemy kicks ass

_{Kick your ass!}

What if said mod has been incarcerated? Could one come back to the old pen and remain owner?

Alright, tell me those accounts that have a higher lever of manipulation.

That submission, where you talked to yourself, would have being funnier if it was one of your ARCH ENEMY videos.

XD Ironfist does it too!!

https://archive.fo/a1CmD

https://voat.co/v/SoapboxBanhammer/3048663#Old/

https://archive.fo/GnIta

This submission was linked from this v/ProtectVoat submission by @kevdude.

^{Posted automatically (#24491) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.}

Why change voat at all? Certified voats? Will they look like http://magaimg.net/img/7bt4.jpg ?

I already removed them (queue power admin comments).

I suggested this the first time, but are you going to allow for a subverse owner to designate the people who can vote in his sub? These features sound more credible as a council type deal than as a popular vote.

For example, an owner could appoint 20 solid participants in his subverse with voting rights, since he can vet them personally and they (presumably) agree with his outlook on the sub and its content. Then he can pitch votes to them to gain better feedback /allow them a degree of power in helping make changes to his sub. Their power to remove him could be optional when he sets it up, and could be based on his activity. So if he abandoned the sub, after a few months where he hasn't logged in the option would open for them to vote on a new owner.

Just my two cents at a more moderate approach.

Sorry Off Topic I know, but My master indicates an error in your regime:

https://voat.co/u/Thaytan/comments

Bugged for me. And though more obnoxious than usual, I hit the "10 post in 24 hours" limit before I made 10 posts I think.

Deleting this account now, Hail Thaytan.

So basically because of the subverse types, I have the choice between being a dictator (doesn’t sound free speech friendly), or allowing mob rule. So I can be outed from my ownership position of the subverse I am apart of by random people who never even contribute to the subverse because I don’t post Nazi shit or spew racial hatred 24/7? I even allow that garbage to be posted there, but because I don’t obsess over it, and I have a different opinion than the masses here, I could be considered a “Jew” and a threat to free speech by the crazies here. This just seems like an excuse for people to character assassinate those they disagree with so they can get their way, the complete opposite of free speech.

I read the whole thing and I don't understand it at all. A short, clear introduction would've been nice. As well as explaining how this new system(?) will differ from the existing voting mechanism.

Hey @PuttIyOut, you dropped something..

Seriously, what the fuck is this shit? This is a terrible idea. Put down the crack pipe and cut the bullshit. This idea is seriously some shady, grubby Jew banker. I don't trust this at all.

Glad to see this. Great wok. Either it will be great, or it will be used for ebil.

The first secret Jew Voat sponsor features roll out. :::gets popcorn:::

in 1990 @gnashingoftheteeth raped and murdered a white infant

Tell me that this isn't the beginning of facilitating mob rule on Voat. It sounds suspiciously like you're working on implementing mechanisms that will allow a majority of users to impose outcomes on the minority through Voat votes. If so, please explain how you expect this to turn out different than it has on Reddit.

After reading all this I cant decide if this is gay or not? It might not be antisemetic enough either

I need to have my Jewish accountant and Jewish lawyer look this document over.

I dont vote.

As others have expressed, i feel that direct voting just turns into a popularity contest shitshow and it will be heavily abused by multi-acct spammers, shills and Qtards to initiate mob rule over everyone else, please dont let this happen, we need checks and balances

This is retarded. As if shills dont already have enough power to censor using downvoat brigading

Congrats, you are/have adding/added a way for large groups of people to brigade and take over voat.

Ooooooh, seriously liking this. Looks like a lot of thought went into it.

It also allows moderators to clearly set the type of sub they want, and if people are worried about 'censorship' they can just avoid those subs. If someone wants to join a sub that's 'curated', they can join a Dictatorship if they agree with that dictator's rules.

It'll take some time for people to get used to and accept - but it looks like it's a great choice to advance the whole site.

Are you going to push those changes to the github repo?

You might want to sticky this Putt.

I am on mobile and at first it wasn't stickied, then it was, and now it is back to no sticky.

Hey Putt I've run micro governments for game development / feature development and direct population votes are not good. I've found having the people vote on a direct list of intelligent people who care about the project to represent them, and then their votes taken in private work best (extremely well). In fact this system worked so well it boosted participation in the game significantly because they felt they were represented and stuff was getting taken care of.

I thought saying niggerfaggot was how we down voated?

Hmmm. Is this really necessary?