I am @SoldDownRiver.........hey moron OP when did I ever say anything about Russia or make any comparison between Russia and America???? Who exactly are you trying to prove a point to??? All you have done is prove my point about how stupid you are by using the liberal technique of trying to twist my words into a conversation I was not having. Let me guess the Earth is flat? Idiot LOL.
On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated upon reentering Earth's atmosphere, killing all seven crew members https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster NASA had 17 years to build a replacement, the Shuttle is or was unsafe and if you count back to Space Shuttle Challenger disaster they were warned in the 1980s about this vehicle. Russian Soviet designs still fly because they were more simple and reliable, the Shuttle tried to be a swiss army knife of 4-5 types of vehicle, station or launcher in one, it failed because it was too complex. Russia has managed to use its rockets for space tourism while Shuttle killed its first teacher in space.
I believe all of that but what's your point? I didn't know we were arguing about who space program was safer. Again liberal technique of trying to twist my words and change the conversation.
NASA will stay ahead but only by luck and because the others didn't take the opportunity @LettItBurn@mattsixteen24 !! @Phantom42@Ex-Redditor@Tallest_Skil Russia, Japan, China and others seem to make a big come back catching up with flights and robots, I think European tech could have caught up with NASA if it were not for French cowardice and Euro Brit style bureaucracy, they have a group called ESA it works kinda, very advanced tech like Cern but they don't fly people in space
Technology hasn't progressed since the 1960s. That goes for all fields, but let's talk about spaceflight specifically. What have we seen since Werner Von Braun designed the Rocketdyne F1? Nothing. No advancement. Weaker engines, in fact. But that's not even the main problem–we've seen no new TYPES of rocket engine. They're all exactly the same format, just with different fuel mixtures. Oh, sure, there are literally hundreds of proposals and studies. It used to fascinate me to read about them. I don't anymore, though. It's too painful. Because they will never exist. Ever. It's the future we should have had–and would have had–if America had stayed white and killed all jews. A future where whites started slowly eradicating the rest of the races on Earth while expanding throughout the solar system. Because we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. But we can't do that anymore.
Multicultural societies never advance technologically. Everyone "hunkers down"–this is scientifically proven–and refuses to engage socially or work to improve the community. There's no point. Your future–the future of your species, through your children–is not guaranteed. In fact, the subconscious brain knows it's FORGONE entirely, so you keep to yourself. And so does everyone else. No trust in society means no cooperation. No cooperation means no advancement.
Why was the Shuttle bogged down in bureaucracy such that the final design was absolutely worthless from a reusability standpoint? Jews. More directly, the "listlessness" that comes from a society with no direction. A multicultural society.
Nothing will ever improve until we restore our nations to the way they're supposed to be.
Posted automatically (#17462) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
view the rest of the comments →
15912164? ago
I am @SoldDownRiver.........hey moron OP when did I ever say anything about Russia or make any comparison between Russia and America???? Who exactly are you trying to prove a point to??? All you have done is prove my point about how stupid you are by using the liberal technique of trying to twist my words into a conversation I was not having. Let me guess the Earth is flat? Idiot LOL.
15912325? ago
On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated upon reentering Earth's atmosphere, killing all seven crew members https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster NASA had 17 years to build a replacement, the Shuttle is or was unsafe and if you count back to Space Shuttle Challenger disaster they were warned in the 1980s about this vehicle. Russian Soviet designs still fly because they were more simple and reliable, the Shuttle tried to be a swiss army knife of 4-5 types of vehicle, station or launcher in one, it failed because it was too complex. Russia has managed to use its rockets for space tourism while Shuttle killed its first teacher in space.
15912604? ago
I believe all of that but what's your point? I didn't know we were arguing about who space program was safer. Again liberal technique of trying to twist my words and change the conversation.
15912715? ago
this anon thread? ok guys i will ask, why has the American public lost its interest in supporting NASA ? @Hydrocephalus @elitch2 @GhostSkin @ALIENS2222 ?
15912975? ago
NASA will stay ahead but only by luck and because the others didn't take the opportunity @LettItBurn @mattsixteen24 !! @Phantom42 @Ex-Redditor @Tallest_Skil Russia, Japan, China and others seem to make a big come back catching up with flights and robots, I think European tech could have caught up with NASA if it were not for French cowardice and Euro Brit style bureaucracy, they have a group called ESA it works kinda, very advanced tech like Cern but they don't fly people in space
15913243? ago
Technology hasn't progressed since the 1960s. That goes for all fields, but let's talk about spaceflight specifically. What have we seen since Werner Von Braun designed the Rocketdyne F1? Nothing. No advancement. Weaker engines, in fact. But that's not even the main problem–we've seen no new TYPES of rocket engine. They're all exactly the same format, just with different fuel mixtures. Oh, sure, there are literally hundreds of proposals and studies. It used to fascinate me to read about them. I don't anymore, though. It's too painful. Because they will never exist. Ever. It's the future we should have had–and would have had–if America had stayed white and killed all jews. A future where whites started slowly eradicating the rest of the races on Earth while expanding throughout the solar system. Because we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. But we can't do that anymore.
Multicultural societies never advance technologically. Everyone "hunkers down"–this is scientifically proven–and refuses to engage socially or work to improve the community. There's no point. Your future–the future of your species, through your children–is not guaranteed. In fact, the subconscious brain knows it's FORGONE entirely, so you keep to yourself. And so does everyone else. No trust in society means no cooperation. No cooperation means no advancement.
Why was the Shuttle bogged down in bureaucracy such that the final design was absolutely worthless from a reusability standpoint? Jews. More directly, the "listlessness" that comes from a society with no direction. A multicultural society.
Nothing will ever improve until we restore our nations to the way they're supposed to be.
15913895? ago
Yeah this is the creepiest ping EVER. Who the fuck is this guy?
15914133? ago
This comment was linked from this v/ScienceAnon comment by @15914131.
Posted automatically (#17462) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
15914382? ago
Even MOAR creepy shit...