I just post my opinions which are most likely dumb. If you are suggesting I'm in cahoots with anyone, or have some kind of agenda other than spouting my stupid shit, you are incorrect.
I've seen my own post's votes change in seemingly impossible ways. I base my opinions on my own experiences. Most of my latest posts are based on Putt ignoring every call for transparency, and a belief that Atko was forced out.
I came here to get away from bannings, censorship, and forced narratives pushed my moneyed interests. More and more, all of these things seems to be creeping into voat.
I've seen my own post's votes change in seemingly impossible ways.
There are ways to capture this via archives.
I base my opinions on my own experiences. Most of my latest posts are based on Putt ignoring every call for transparency, and a belief that Atko was forced out.
You might be right on some of that, but agreeing with usernames that are almost assuredly shills doesn't help your case.
I came here to get away from bannings, censorship, and forced narratives pushed my moneyed interests. More and more, all of these things seems to be creeping into voat.
Archive that sort of thing. Put together a post about it. You just saying this and not supporting your words in any way is suspicious.
I don't do research on people that I reply to. I don't have the fight in me to gather evidence to back my claims. Even if I were right, what would change if I could prove it?
You can think I am not to be trusted if you like, but I am telling you that anything I post here comes solely from my own opinions.
I don't do research on people that I reply to. I don't have the fight in me to gather evidence to back my claims. Even if I were right, what would change if I could prove it?
Understandable on the first two. The last one, you never know.
You can think I am not to be trusted if you like, but I am telling you that anything I post here comes solely from my own opinions.
Every username is defaulted to not being trusted by me, and while I sincerely wish I could take you at your word, you're a stranger on the internet. All I have to go on is your behaviour and coincidental (or not) responses to pretty obvious shills.
view the rest of the comments →
Kal ago
You guys are being played like a two dollar fiddle.
Crensch ago
Above written by @Kal
@Kal defended @bijou who is very obviously a shill.
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/1867430/9147294 <--- kal agreeing with @bijou --> https://archive.is/LAEzU
@bijou in a thread with 11 5-month-old, low SCP/CCP accounts complaining about "vote manipulation"
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/1867430
Highlights below:
https://voat.co/v/ProtectVoat/1867619
Kal ago
I just post my opinions which are most likely dumb. If you are suggesting I'm in cahoots with anyone, or have some kind of agenda other than spouting my stupid shit, you are incorrect.
edit: For clarity, what are you even saying?
Crensch ago
At the very least I'm saying that your opinions align with people likely paid to be here and push a narrative.
That tends to be a good indication that you're not someone to trust.
Kal ago
I've seen my own post's votes change in seemingly impossible ways. I base my opinions on my own experiences. Most of my latest posts are based on Putt ignoring every call for transparency, and a belief that Atko was forced out.
I came here to get away from bannings, censorship, and forced narratives pushed my moneyed interests. More and more, all of these things seems to be creeping into voat.
Crensch ago
There are ways to capture this via archives.
You might be right on some of that, but agreeing with usernames that are almost assuredly shills doesn't help your case.
Archive that sort of thing. Put together a post about it. You just saying this and not supporting your words in any way is suspicious.
Kal ago
I don't do research on people that I reply to. I don't have the fight in me to gather evidence to back my claims. Even if I were right, what would change if I could prove it?
You can think I am not to be trusted if you like, but I am telling you that anything I post here comes solely from my own opinions.
Crensch ago
Understandable on the first two. The last one, you never know.
Every username is defaulted to not being trusted by me, and while I sincerely wish I could take you at your word, you're a stranger on the internet. All I have to go on is your behaviour and coincidental (or not) responses to pretty obvious shills.