You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

BillyLuath ago

Not this shit again... What's wrong with a rifle you can actually hit what you're aiming at, just because you have to keep it oiled?

clamhurt_legbeard ago

what do you mean

i hit out to 500 m with my ak

thats the limit of the round

BillyLuath ago

I get .33 inch with hand loaded 64 grain Noslers at 100 yards. I can hit crap out at yardages, to boot, all while looking AR15/M4 good.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

sounds good but you didnt answer my original question

BillyLuath ago

what do you mean

That question?

I think I answered it. The AK is fine for Africans and bohunks, but it's not exactly a precision instrument.

It's the Lada of the gun world, I'll stick to ARs.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

it hits a person as far out as the round allows

which is incidentally the same range as the ar you mentioned

what was it you dislike about the ak

BillyLuath ago

The ammo mostly,,, after that the minute of man sighting arrangement, No, actually I don't like the sighting plane more than I dislike the ammo.

Now, let's talk optics, it was invented before optics were feasible, but it's never been fixed, mounting an optic is cumbersome.

Then there's the safety/sand cover, again, mitten headed.

And also there's, that rattle, you know what I mean, it just says: made in a tractor factory.

But mostly, it's the limited sight radius that gripes me mostly.

clamhurt_legbeard ago

i use a kashtan

BillyLuath ago

You don't find range finding with the chevron unintuitive?

clamhurt_legbeard ago

no its fine

and the lines can be used for range finding

plus in reality the first 500 m is just the first chevron

so basically just point the top chevron at the thing you want dead and pull the trigger

its very fast and easy

i have another mount that attaches the same way and you put an aimpoint t1 on it