Trump's closing argument. "I've been a politician for 3.5 years. Joe has drawn a salary from taxpayers for 47 years. I worked on everything I campaigned on, economics, military, peace, jobs, security" (QRV)

submitted ago by 4017979?

Joe has made promises to taxpayers and voters in every election in those 47 years. And for all the country's investment in his leadership, he authored nothing, created not one job, weakened the military, empowered our rivals and enemies, made our borders meaningless, enriched his son and brother and himself.

Do you vote for the guy who in only 3.5 years of politics has lived up to every single promise he's ever made or the guy who in 47 years has lived up to none? And as we need to rebuild the economy ravaged by the pandemic shutdown, do we trust the one candidate who actually created the best job market in US history, or do we entrust rebuilding with the oldest president of all time who never created a job in 47 years and who is clearly suffering from cognitive decline? The decision couldn't be more obvious. If you want America to succeed, then there is one choice and that is to vote for me. If you want it to suffer, there is one choice and that is to plunge into the hands of someone who has never succeeded at anything but siphoning off the system.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

25572990? ago

A vote for Trump is a vote for Fauci. Since Fauci is the one who is setting all of our policy now.

25574736? ago

Did you ever consider that by allowing [them] to institute lock downs that it was multipurpose?

  1. It helps to protect the public...not from the virus but from some planned deeds by [them].
  2. It works as a fantastic smoke screen by being able to use the media hype about the virus so that the goods guys can clean house behind the scenes with pedos. If the pedos are locked down too then they'll be online...easy trace.
  3. Most everything went into electronic mode...easy trace on electronic channels for [their] comms.
  4. With few people moving around, easier surveillance on anomalies of movements by [them].
  5. Kids home with parents...no school shootings.
  6. Kids home with parents...no longer easier to targets to kidnap & much easier to see where kidnappings are occurring when they happen.
  7. Easier to see trafficking patterns.
  8. This list can go on and on...

Think outside the box. Use your enemy's stupidity in your favor. They think they're being slick by controlling the populous but it boomerangs in multiple ways that they were too stupid to see/consider.

Chaos created by [them] can be used as great cover for the operators.