Hundreds of Patriots have literally put their names on the line in outward shows of support for revisiting Section 230. Section 230 is currently interpreted in a way that allows providers to censor conservative content and get legal immunity for depriving us of our Freedom of Speech. This needs to end.
For far too long, the globalists have used gov public comment sections to support their agenda. They've counted on a sleeping public not expressing their opinions. That is changing. We are awake, we have a voice, and we're making it heard. There are naysayers who tell us none of this makes a difference. They are wrong. As Patriots piled onto the site, at least two Globalist organizations posted opposition statements. The Globalist groups routinely post immediately after a public comment section opens, so the fact that they jumped in yesterday shows they're concerned about Patriot support for revisiting Section 230. Good going, Pats!
The Globalist groups posting opposition share a common funding source with Lawfare, a known anti-Trump, anti-Patriot organization. We also heard from a Patriot, who posted this notice on Yahoo, that Yahoo deleted the post. Is it a coincidence that Yahoo is connected to the same people associated with Lawfare and other Globalist groups? No. We are seeing a pattern here, Pats, and more of that pattern will be apparent soon.
If you've already posted a comment, thank you for supporting free speech. If you haven't posted, go here to tell the FCC you support Trump's petition to:revisit Section 230: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express (enter RM-11862 in the "proceedings" box if it isn't already there.)
Why this important: Online providers are using Section 230 to censor conservative content and to claim legal immunity.
POTUS recently signed an executive order (EO) on "Preventing Online Censorship." The EO calls on the NTIA to file a petition with the FCC to clarify the scope of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The FCC opened the issue for public comment. We need to make sure the petition goes forward. The globalists want to make sure it does not.
Lawfare, a globalist-funded, know enemy of the Trump Administration is rallying against Trump's order. They want Section 230 to remain the way it is. They want to censor Patriot voices and face no legal liability for doing it. https://www.lawfareblog.com/fcc-opens-public-comments-trumps-proposed-revisions-section-230
Techcrunch and other Globalist publications are doing the same. https://techcrunch.com/2020/08/03/fcc-invites-public-comment-on-trumps-attempt-to-nerf-section-230/
With less than 12 hours left before public comments close, we need to get as many Pats as possible in there. There are millions of Trump supporters in this country - Round them up!
After you've signed it, send it to every Patriot you know, and ask them to do the same. We're showing the Power of the People!
view the rest of the comments →
25446617? ago
Put what for "Filters"? Going to share but want to write simple instructions. Thanks and God bless!
25447055? ago
The easiest thing is using the express link: https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings/express
You'll see a box for "Proceedings." In that box type RM-11862
"Filer:" Persons name (you have to hit "enter" after filling in the name. If you fill it in and scroll to next box, it won't let you submit the form.
If people want to upload evidence, like bans for "inappropriate content" they can do it on the main page (which I think is the page you're looking at that has "filters" on it.)
I hope this helps.
Thanks for filing and sharing, and may God bless you too.:
25447348? ago
My apologies.
WHOSE NAME DO I PUT.
Okay now before hitting submit I'm just leaving that there for the humor I just got it!!!
My progressive lenses (the only thing democratic I have, I told the clerk when I bought them :) ) sometimes mess the screen up (like most progressive behaviors do), so I thought I was seeing "filters" (with a "T" after the "L").
I was like, "okay, I don't understand proceedings, and now the second field I don't know what filters I'm going to need for them to search through the proceedings, this really doesn't make sense and is a lot of hoops to jump through so let me ask the OP about it."
Then I almost hit submit on the above, and then saw more clearly -- in the Voat font -- that you had written "filers" not "filters". So went back to the original, and now it makes sense.
I've not seen a form with "filer" in it, I guess! Mostly "submitter" or "author" or such. Worldly, but newbie at times. :)
When I started typing the "Okay" above, I had a vision of the "Who's on first?" routine and laughed out loud so wanted to share it.
I get it now, I'm the filer.
"You're the loof!" -- Fez confusing "you're aloof", from That 70s Show
Oh also -- you got a 5 by 5 so you explained it perfectly :)
25447635? ago
No apologies necessary :-)
This is hilarious - thanks for a badly-needed laugh :-)
You know the gov - if they can find a way to make forms more confusing, they will :-o
Thanks for the laugh - and for sharing elsewhere. And good luck with lenses :-)
25447826? ago
You are welcome. I at least try to include some humor in my descriptions of trauma; it seems better received. :)
Seriously. Synchronicity EVERYWHERE today. "A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down; in the most delightful way." From Mary Poppins; 4 spoonfuls of sugar are necessary for every one spoonful of turpentine (pure gum spirits), in order to clear out parasites!
The sugar "opens their mouths" and the turpentine takes them apart.
Peed out dead ropeworms a week or two ago.
It's fun sharing.
God bless.
25447900? ago
I think in this case, rather than including humor with trauma, you included trauma (ropeworms) with your humor. :-)
God bless you too.
25447952? ago
You get another dub. This is such a weird day. Got lots of sevens, talking about Se7en, earlier today:
https://files.catbox.moe/w54qua.png
From https://voat.co/v/QRV/4003477/25443777
My response to it (with the above image) also got a 262 palindrome, with a 444 -- "Lord Christ" first result Jewish; "Jesus" first result English/Simple https://www.gematrix.org/?word=444
Then got lots of twos. Most recently I was "not even safe on the throne" -- reading Mark Taylor's book, "The Trump Prophecies" and highlighted a section to make a note -- and while saving the note, added to it that I noticed I was making this note on the book's page 222.
I can't write fast enough, kek!!!
25448054? ago
Wow - I never notice stuff like that.
So what do you think it means, getting repetitive numbers? Do you see them as a positive sign?
25452981? ago
Yes. I have a feeling it's God/Jesus talking to me. Reading something my cousin wrote 17 years ago (yeah, I know, 17...) about the Song of Solomon, and that Jesus is in every heart, that we have a personal relationship with Him. It's a marriage.
My wife is "until death do us part" and Jesus is forever.
Also, it's some weird database-style "one-to-many" relationship -- we each have Jesus all to ourselves; and He has all of us.
I think it's nudging me in a direction. Trying to figure that direction out. I have a brother who keeps coming up and who was estranged for about a year; I called him a few weeks ago as a result of seeing his name/initials everywhere.
After reconnecting it told me only the first born can prophecy, and that he has characteristics of a leader. Looked the first up and haven't found the rule but God told Moses that his eldest brother Aaron would be his prophet. So that fits the rule but doesn't prove it; need to look further.
What a wild ride though. Another result from something personal -- "settling in to my new reality". So wild. Want to share it with everyone, but I understand that not everyone can be firstborn. Weird that royalty descends the way it does, seems (if the above is true) that it would intentionally cause conflict since the first born has far vision, but the second born may be a better leader of men.
That may explain why you don't notice? Also it takes practice, NMBRFG was sharing a lot here and getting heavily downvoted but I saw that he saw something, and then I started doing my own searches in https://www.gematrix.org/
God bless.
25456827? ago
:-)