I took a gander at all the files and only found one where I could copy and paste redacted text. It was the plaintiffs motion to force the defendant (Maxwell) to have another deposition because Maxwell was playing coy and would not answer any related questions, even to do with consensual adult sex activity. They probably wanted that redacted because it refers to things covered by the judge's order. We should know more Monday.
Docs 31.0, 66.0, 82.0, and 136.0 give a "not found." Other numbers seem to be missing entirely.
Doc 143.0 is 95% redacted, but you can block and copy, and then pasted into a text editor and see all of the redacted text. In other words, the redaction was merely placed on top of the text, not in place of the text.
There are some interesting exhibits, such as one picturing Susan Sarandon with a suspected trafficker.
Most of the docs are boring run-of-the-mill stuff, but a few will be very interesting.
I read on Twitter last night that if you copy the redacted page, then paste into a text document, the unredacted disappears. Which is why you don't want to use a site where they have "assisted" by converting the redacted page into png or jpg images. Not sure what happens if turned into a pdf.
Posted automatically (#124172) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
24983007? ago
I took a gander at all the files and only found one where I could copy and paste redacted text. It was the plaintiffs motion to force the defendant (Maxwell) to have another deposition because Maxwell was playing coy and would not answer any related questions, even to do with consensual adult sex activity. They probably wanted that redacted because it refers to things covered by the judge's order. We should know more Monday.
24982614? ago
Docs 31.0, 66.0, 82.0, and 136.0 give a "not found." Other numbers seem to be missing entirely.
Doc 143.0 is 95% redacted, but you can block and copy, and then pasted into a text editor and see all of the redacted text. In other words, the redaction was merely placed on top of the text, not in place of the text.
There are some interesting exhibits, such as one picturing Susan Sarandon with a suspected trafficker.
Most of the docs are boring run-of-the-mill stuff, but a few will be very interesting.
24982500? ago
I read on Twitter last night that if you copy the redacted page, then paste into a text document, the unredacted disappears. Which is why you don't want to use a site where they have "assisted" by converting the redacted page into png or jpg images. Not sure what happens if turned into a pdf.
24982045? ago
Affirmative action, oppression checkbox hire at work, a happy whitehat accident or released on purpose to distract and sacrifice some scapegoats.
24982559? ago
Or released on purpose so we can examine them closely.
24980319? ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#124172) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.