Nothing in the Q post says those names are on the flight log to pedo island. Most of those names were bandied about long before QRV. The Jeffrey Epstein twice is just as intriguing.
I think we can't assume the list of names is from flight logs. The context suggests its Epstein-related but it could be donors or associates listed for some other purpose.
I think we can't assume the list of names is from flight logs.
That's exactly what it is purported to be by those who originally shared it before Q propagated it. Moreover, it is largely accurate despite the embellishment of adding Jim Carrey in the place of Jim Kenney.
The context suggests its Epstein-related but it could be donors or associates listed for some other purpose.
There is absolutely zero evidence anywhere suggesting Jim Carrey has any favorable association with Jeffrey Epstein, moreover, Jim Carrey has been vocal about how disturbing it is that Jeffrey Epstein was given the easy way out.
Could turn out that Carrey doth protest too much. There could be unseen logs with or without his name.
OR
(and maybe more likely) there are others listed who are also not on the logs. Maybe some are Island visitors who had their own transportation. Or maybe it's a list of people who quietly if not illegally offered defensive support for Epstein or the Clintons.
Is there a legal difference between Q sharing classified information directly vs sharing a meme a citizen created? If Q writes the names then it's an intelligence leak by Q. If Q shares someone's independent research, its just amplifying an independent voice that may or may not be correct.
Q has always placed a heavy emphasis on people doing their own research and asking the right questions.
Typical attempt to defend not only a failure on Q's part to aim for accuracy and truth, but also the flagrant lie by whoever decided to, without researching the document themselves, add Jim Carrey's name.
Q has always placed a heavy emphasis on people doing their own research and asking the right questions.
Even if that's true, Q holds a certain degree of responsibility when it comes to the dissemination of "fake news", given that Q is or at least should be well aware that a massive majority of followers won't actually take the time to vet such a list. Shocker, I did vet it and found the falsehood.
Will those who keep slandering Jim Carrey acknowledge their failure to perform due diligence? No, they'll double down and keep attacking the guy because oh noes he doesn't like Trump.
See how that works? I'm not Jim and I can only presume you aren't Mark. Maybe you should get a fucking clue before running your mouth and aligning yourself with a Scientologist plot to extort and smear Jim.
24621816? ago
Nothing in the Q post says those names are on the flight log to pedo island. Most of those names were bandied about long before QRV. The Jeffrey Epstein twice is just as intriguing.
24612409? ago
FYI.
Epstein’s island is less than 2 miles boat ride from st Thomas. You didn’t need to ride the Lolita express to get there.
24611464? ago
I think we can't assume the list of names is from flight logs. The context suggests its Epstein-related but it could be donors or associates listed for some other purpose.
24611476? ago
That's exactly what it is purported to be by those who originally shared it before Q propagated it. Moreover, it is largely accurate despite the embellishment of adding Jim Carrey in the place of Jim Kenney.
There is absolutely zero evidence anywhere suggesting Jim Carrey has any favorable association with Jeffrey Epstein, moreover, Jim Carrey has been vocal about how disturbing it is that Jeffrey Epstein was given the easy way out.
24611532? ago
Could turn out that Carrey doth protest too much. There could be unseen logs with or without his name.
OR
(and maybe more likely) there are others listed who are also not on the logs. Maybe some are Island visitors who had their own transportation. Or maybe it's a list of people who quietly if not illegally offered defensive support for Epstein or the Clintons.
24611531? ago
Is there a legal difference between Q sharing classified information directly vs sharing a meme a citizen created? If Q writes the names then it's an intelligence leak by Q. If Q shares someone's independent research, its just amplifying an independent voice that may or may not be correct.
Q has always placed a heavy emphasis on people doing their own research and asking the right questions.
24611546? ago
Typical attempt to defend not only a failure on Q's part to aim for accuracy and truth, but also the flagrant lie by whoever decided to, without researching the document themselves, add Jim Carrey's name.
Even if that's true, Q holds a certain degree of responsibility when it comes to the dissemination of "fake news", given that Q is or at least should be well aware that a massive majority of followers won't actually take the time to vet such a list. Shocker, I did vet it and found the falsehood.
Will those who keep slandering Jim Carrey acknowledge their failure to perform due diligence? No, they'll double down and keep attacking the guy because oh noes he doesn't like Trump.
24611359? ago
Understandable, he would have given all the merchandise STDs.
24611360? ago
Except he didn't give STDs to anyone. That was a fabrication with intent to extort him, no doubt the brainchild of Scientologist Mark Burton.
Nice try, faggot.
24611439? ago
Whatever you say, Jim. Go paint some more lunatic paintings. They'll hang them beside Gacys paintings.
24611478? ago
Whatever you say, Mark.
See how that works? I'm not Jim and I can only presume you aren't Mark. Maybe you should get a fucking clue before running your mouth and aligning yourself with a Scientologist plot to extort and smear Jim.