What did he do to Candace? I just saw a Normie struggling to cope with a waking nightmare, the realization that She is 100% correct, and like all the other normies, he is unable to cope with the reality they have been lied to their whole lives... Like Candace said, it completely turned her life upside down. Kinda like how in the Matrix they won't try and free your mind after a certain point, you can't handle the truth. She was/is young when she flipped. Joe is an example of how a rigid mind can't make the switch without defending the reality as he understands it. Cognitive Dissonance.

!00% he definitely does, but I think it's because he know's he can't talk about it. Not without the blow-back that is. Stealth bombers take precautions to avoid detection.

You underestimate the level of brainwashing they are under. They are told "don't look there!", "racist!", ("anti-semite") I believe they're under some authoritative psychological hold that internally tells them if they even question the narrative they too will be ostracized and lumped into the out-group "racist" category. Since they know how badly that group is perceived by "their" group, they just tow the line Assuming that the group they are apart of has their best interests in mind and the out-group is the minority.

Oh the Irony.

Brainwashed, npc's, zombies, libtards, doesn't matter what you call them or how you think of them, they're clearly existing in this delusional state somehow...

Never underestimate the power of ignorance.

Until they can ignore no longer...

That's when people finally Begin to wake up.

To your point, my point is this,

Rational people think for themselves, sheep follow the herd. If someone "thinks" he is good it doesn't really matter cause they're not really thinking yet are they... I "think" of the probably few Hundreds of hours I've passively or actively watched or listened to Joe interact with his guests, he:

Has some serious interview skills.

He certainly has something special beyond some Mossad funding to keep the lights on and the ridiculous hawking of diet pills or supplements, The Slinging of wildly unsupported conspiracy theories with just a dash of truth. He may very well be on "the dark side" controlled opposition, but to what exactly? He's not really preaching anything except diet and exercise. He has his beliefs, but what is he doing that is subversive? I see him as a great interviewer on par with Howard Stern in his day. Howard had a style of interviewing akin to harassment. He would just keep asking the same thing in different ways that he knew his guests didn't want to talk about and would eventually peer pressure them into dishing some juicy gossip.

Joe is the polar opposite in this regard. He has all the time in the world and he's done his homework beforehand, he know's what questions to ask and when, the one's that he really want's to ask but sometimes he can't (Watch him interview Bill Mayer).

He always wants to check facts during the interview online, and he has always appears to be "on their side". He will steer the conversation away from things sometimes, because, Shit, look who he is sitting across from! These are people who don't do chill, they are socio-pathic and used to prepared scripts or at least bullet points... Joe is like a wild card in this regard, you can see the question he wants to ask like a loaded revolver pointed right at his "guest" and it's a kill shot, but he doesn't take it. I've seen him do this many times with his guests that are high profile and just need a bump in ratings so they do an hour maybe 2 tops... they want to get in and get out with as little of that socio-pathic veil lifting as possible.

Other guests you can tell he genuinely really admires and respects and easily gets lost in 2-3 even 4 hours conversations, taking every bit of knowledge he can get by asking the best questions he can think of while trying to understand something totally new to him (most times). He has these people back repeatedly as he tries to put more and more pieces of the puzzle together.

I think he is smart, but not smart enough to be as dumb as Alex Jones. If we are to believe he is controlled opposition we would have to believe Q is as well. He makes too many connections to things that are trying to remain hidden, sheds too much light on the darkness... he's doing too much damage as controlled opposition as opposed to what the gathering of "followers" would ever gain him/them.

If you compare him to Alex Jones, as soon as he starts saying crazy shit, people will stop watching, at least the people that can think for themselves. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if the reason they deplatformed Alex was because they were hiding the fact that they fucked up so badly in that regard, his ratings were falling and they intended utilizing the Streisand Effect while hiding him from mainstream. THAT'S Controlled Opposition.

Sorry went off the rails on a ramble there a bit. Not a proportional response but worth it if I can convince some people to give him more than a cursory glance. I recommend selectively watching Joe, something in your wheel house because I admit most of his videos I find unwatchable if the guest/topic doesn't fit with my research.

TLDR;

Joe is smart enough "not to go there" when his "outrageous" guests start going down a crazy rabbit hole topic. I mean can you imagine if and when he starts talking to someone or everyone about Q?

His standard question just like "What do you think about this whole covid thing" instead... "What do you think about this whole Qanon thing?" and then actually discussing it? For Hours?!

Total madness my friend, as well as... not much anonymity.

You think "they" want that kind of exposure?

You think if you were Joe, you would want to ask a question that could jeopardize everything?

Dude is a Samurai ninja.