Do you know what it means for a story to be "embargoed"? In the media, or in a corporation when they are putting together an announcement, they might internally label the material embargoed, which indicates to everyone working on the material that this is not to go out to the public yet.
It seems like Q is watching the Deep State, perhaps with warranted NSA surveillance, and he can see them accessing twitter.
Q saw them preparing their GF "story", before it "went live". ie, while it was "embargoed". The DS knew that GF was to be be sacrified.
Q is signalling to the DS that they've been caught.
But you'd have to be the guilty party to be sure of what happened. Hence, "Not all posts are meant for Anons."
You think this is evidence of a premeditated murder plot?!
If the May 17 snapshot is true (and no proof of that has yet been provided) then it’s just proof of rolling out a media fakery storyline. GF obviously did not die, it’s just fake news. Acting. It isn’t real.
I don't believe he was killed as shown, by asphyxiation.
I do suspect he was murdered after the "acting". And not just murdered, but ritualistically sacrificed in order to command the favor of certain demonic spirits.
Is it ALL fake - no murder? I doubt it - the DS people appear genuinely terrified to me.
I do not believe that GF's life was worth anything at all to them, much less the risk of letting him live to tell the tale.
Posted automatically (#115225) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
So this should mean that Q already has the evidence documented and prepared to be used against the DS, otherwise DS would attempt to destroy evidence. You only let someone know you caught them if you plan to act on it, or force the DS to make another foolish move.
They didn't explain or summarize. They SPECULATED and GUESSED. Maybe that poster is right, but before you go sucking their dick you should consider there is zero evidence to back up their version and there are many possible versions that fit just as well.
obummer is that (You)? Me thinks thou dost protest too much sir! You on your way to GITMO right now or awaiting trial or something? Wait, I know, obummer campaign staffer! That's it isn't it?
^This^ IS "Guessing and Speculating" what the anon above did was NOT this.
They have no evidence to back up their claims. That's the definition of what "speculation" is. Lean proper research skills dumbass, we need thinkers not blind followers who are just here to chant slogans or be cliquey dumbasses like high school girls.
Whether technically correct or not, the anon has summarized what the current majority consensus is on the QRV board about the topic in general, and as advertised it was easy to understand. A critical thinker knows nothing is certain, the explanation might be incorrect, but at least it took all the elements other more savvy anons agreed upon and put them into layman's terms for the rest of the Pepes. Not easy to translate like that, the anon deserved props IMHO.
(You) assume I'm doing here what (You) are doing here.... (I'm not, I'm here to LEARN!)
Divide much? (try harder...) We're on the same team stupid (Team Humans), you just don't know it yet.
You'll remember this post the day you find out...
Remember: "Team Hoomons" (That's (You) and me dummy!)
Q fell for a very basic internet concept, where the twitter card for a link is updated in old posts. Hence him thinking that obama posted a link with a picture of George Floyd. But if you looked at other copies of that link from 2018 and 2019, you'd see all the twitter cards were updated with current picture (george floyd).
In response, Q posted some basic tutorial code from Twitter's blog that is totally unrelated and useless. He was called out again on that, and he replies "not all posts are for anons". LOL busted.
To make sure everything pops up the way you want it. for instance a picture that should not show up yet for a story or you accidently have porn in there.
I'm sure theres many that think Q is part of the Trump team. There's stuff that they see that we can't.
Deniers really want to push the updated site story, but why not just make a new post rather than update pics on past events.
but why not just make a new post rather than update pics on past events.
WRONG. Jesus fuck, guys. Stop making assumptions. They didn't update all the old posts, it's done automatically because they all had the same link. The main page image changed, so all links cards to that page automatically updated.
You're trying waaaaaaay too hard to make this fit the narrative with next to knowledge on the subject. It accomplishes nothing because you're inserting 99% of the story. Somestimes a validator is a validator, and a fuckup is a fuckup.
view the rest of the comments →
24187451? ago
Man I follow this stuff from the beginning, but I hate when I’m missing the bigger picture. Confusing for sure. Not really the most technical person.
24188093? ago
I will explain in non-computer terms.
Do you know what it means for a story to be "embargoed"? In the media, or in a corporation when they are putting together an announcement, they might internally label the material embargoed, which indicates to everyone working on the material that this is not to go out to the public yet.
It seems like Q is watching the Deep State, perhaps with warranted NSA surveillance, and he can see them accessing twitter.
Q saw them preparing their GF "story", before it "went live". ie, while it was "embargoed". The DS knew that GF was to be be sacrified.
Q is signalling to the DS that they've been caught.
But you'd have to be the guilty party to be sure of what happened. Hence, "Not all posts are meant for Anons."
24193944? ago
You think this is evidence of a premeditated murder plot?!
If the May 17 snapshot is true (and no proof of that has yet been provided) then it’s just proof of rolling out a media fakery storyline. GF obviously did not die, it’s just fake news. Acting. It isn’t real.
Nobody died, nobody got hurt.
24194137? ago
I don't believe he was killed as shown, by asphyxiation.
I do suspect he was murdered after the "acting". And not just murdered, but ritualistically sacrificed in order to command the favor of certain demonic spirits.
Is it ALL fake - no murder? I doubt it - the DS people appear genuinely terrified to me.
I do not believe that GF's life was worth anything at all to them, much less the risk of letting him live to tell the tale.
24194998? ago
No black lives matter to (((them))) including Hussein.
24195019? ago
agree
24193571? ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#115225) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
24192487? ago
When you say Q, is it a person, a group?
24192852? ago
Yes, and/or spirits, angels.
24191537? ago
Exactly - NSA has Level 0 access to the Internet backbone where intercepts it.
24190468? ago
ThanQ good summary shills seem to be amping this up pretty hard, and if you don’t trust shills you begin with it tells me 0V3l2 +4l2G37
24190520? ago
exactamundo, they are trying real hard to get this cat back in the bag.
24189254? ago
So this should mean that Q already has the evidence documented and prepared to be used against the DS, otherwise DS would attempt to destroy evidence. You only let someone know you caught them if you plan to act on it, or force the DS to make another foolish move.
24188986? ago
FISA goes both ways
24193071? ago
Best reply yet!
24188451? ago
Kek, I know what this anon's role to play is: 'Splainer in Chief' KEK!
Thanks anon, great summery I think you nailed it!
24188991? ago
They didn't explain or summarize. They SPECULATED and GUESSED. Maybe that poster is right, but before you go sucking their dick you should consider there is zero evidence to back up their version and there are many possible versions that fit just as well.
24189351? ago
obummer is that (You)? Me thinks thou dost protest too much sir! You on your way to GITMO right now or awaiting trial or something? Wait, I know, obummer campaign staffer! That's it isn't it?
^This^ IS "Guessing and Speculating" what the anon above did was NOT this.
KEK
24189386? ago
They have no evidence to back up their claims. That's the definition of what "speculation" is. Lean proper research skills dumbass, we need thinkers not blind followers who are just here to chant slogans or be cliquey dumbasses like high school girls.
24188741? ago
You think he nailed it because it agrees with what you want to hear.
Anyone the least bit tech-savvy, Q follower or shill, knows that's bullshit.
24188955? ago
Whether technically correct or not, the anon has summarized what the current majority consensus is on the QRV board about the topic in general, and as advertised it was easy to understand. A critical thinker knows nothing is certain, the explanation might be incorrect, but at least it took all the elements other more savvy anons agreed upon and put them into layman's terms for the rest of the Pepes. Not easy to translate like that, the anon deserved props IMHO.
(You) assume I'm doing here what (You) are doing here.... (I'm not, I'm here to LEARN!)
Divide much? (try harder...) We're on the same team stupid (Team Humans), you just don't know it yet.
You'll remember this post the day you find out...
Remember: "Team Hoomons" (That's (You) and me dummy!)
24189540? ago
Good one.
24189053? ago
He might as well have said that the sky is orange. It is objectively wrong. Why would he deserve props for giving false information?
Only here does someone get called a shill for providing inconvenient truth.
24188855? ago
May we hear your argument, please?
24188990? ago
Q fell for a very basic internet concept, where the twitter card for a link is updated in old posts. Hence him thinking that obama posted a link with a picture of George Floyd. But if you looked at other copies of that link from 2018 and 2019, you'd see all the twitter cards were updated with current picture (george floyd).
In response, Q posted some basic tutorial code from Twitter's blog that is totally unrelated and useless. He was called out again on that, and he replies "not all posts are for anons". LOL busted.
24189195? ago
Q is referring us to some kind of validator.
What is that?
Under what circumstances would someone use it?
24189549? ago
To make sure everything pops up the way you want it. for instance a picture that should not show up yet for a story or you accidently have porn in there.
I'm sure theres many that think Q is part of the Trump team. There's stuff that they see that we can't.
Deniers really want to push the updated site story, but why not just make a new post rather than update pics on past events.
24189920? ago
WRONG. Jesus fuck, guys. Stop making assumptions. They didn't update all the old posts, it's done automatically because they all had the same link. The main page image changed, so all links cards to that page automatically updated.
24189663? ago
So Q may be hinting that the content was presented to Twitter's validator before it was published.
Such being the whole purpose of the validator.
Then we might wonder not just what image was seen publicly, but what might have been given to the validator, and when that happened.
What's public on the cards is obviously NOT the point.
24189893? ago
You're trying waaaaaaay too hard to make this fit the narrative with next to knowledge on the subject. It accomplishes nothing because you're inserting 99% of the story. Somestimes a validator is a validator, and a fuckup is a fuckup.
24188508? ago
aw shucks, thanks.