Problem With Q Post 4436 & WTF Does 4437 Mean? (QRV)

submitted ago by 3861974?

The anon who said "walk it back" appears to be correct from what I can see. Although, maybe something in the subsequent gibberish html that Q posted in 4437 proves otherwise..but I'm not at all following what it proves or how it proves it.

The Obama.org site (like many sites) has opengraph tags embedded in the source code. This is simply meta data that can be used by other sites when a link is posted. So for instance, if you post a link of a website or news article on twitter or facebook, it will populate a thumbnail image in your post as directed by the opengraph tag for image. If there are no opengraph tags, then twitter or facebook will randomly grab an image from the page or site to use as a thumbnail (this isn't relevant in this case as Obama.org had opengraph tags when that tweet was originally posted and still has opengraph tags).

The opengraph image tag on the Obama.org site as of 6/4/2020 looks like this:

<meta property="og:image" content="https://web.archive.org/web/20200604231033im_/https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg"/>

If you paste this portion of the tag in your browser, you'll see the George Floyd photo: https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/053020_GeorgeFloyd_Protests_Chicago_IL_CD_1588-scaled.jpg

If you want to check me on this, simply go here (https://web.archive.org/web/20200604231033/https://www.obama.org/), open the source code (right click on page and then click view source), and then command+F (find) and search for: og:image

This image is controlled by the webmaster and can be switched out whenever someone with access to the backend of the site wants. It appears that twitter automatically updates an old tweet with whatever the current opengraph tags are from what I can tell. So THAT is why you see a tweet with an old date but with a newer image.

Unless the wayback machine is full of shit (which I've never seen proof of in my life), here is the Obama.org homepage on 5/17/2020: https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631/https://www.obama.org/

If you do the same exercise of looking for the opengraph tag in the sourcecode, it looks like this:

<meta property="og:image" content="https://web.archive.org/web/20200517224631im_/https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/M1Hi_j0246-copy-scaled-e1588695935923.jpg"/>

And then you can paste this into your browser and you'll see the image that was featured as the opengraph image on 5/17/2020: https://www.obama.org/wp-content/uploads/M1Hi_j0246-copy-scaled-e1588695935923.jpg

Which is NOT the image of George Floyd, but rather an image of Obama giving a commencement speech in graduation looking clothes/robe.

For those of you who aren't following what I'm showing here, sorry. I've explained it and given you the steps as best as I can. I can't do it for you otherwise.

For those of you who do follow what I'm saying, you should easily understand what this means: twitter simply updates tweet thumbails with whatever the current og image is on site. Likely upon each page load of a given tweet.

Basically, unless Q's subsequent post 4437 somehow proves that the image of George Floyd was actually embedded in the source code on or before 5/17/2020, then he does indeed need to walk that shit back at the least.

If anyone understands the significance of 4437, I'm all ears. But I have to say, at face value, this looks bad and pretty amateur for a group of "high level mil intel operatives".

Not that it changes my view of POTUS and I'll still crawl naked over broken glass to vote for him again in November, but I'm not really sure how to reconcile the Q I thought I knew with this shit.

Also, for the haters: I 'aint a shill, so save it. If you're going to talk shit but don't even understand anything I just posted, then you don't even know what you're talking about in the first place. I'm just being intellectually honest here. I don't like what I've found here, and I'm not going to bury my head in the sand and pretend that it doesn't look like some sort of fuckery, or at the least that Q apparently knows how to take down worldwide criminal orgs but doesn't have the slightest understanding of how websites work in 2020 (which doesn't square with me at all).

Again, if anyone can explain 4437 as a way to reconcile 4436, I'm all ears. And there may well be an explanation that somehow invalidates my findings here, it's just that I just don't know what it is based on what we find in 4437.

24215915? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#115547) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

24185504? ago

All Q said was reconcile. Anons jumped to all kinds of conclusions.....

24185912? ago

At this point I think you're right. But I'm not sure what he intended for us to reconcile unless it's one of those conclusions because there's nothing there that needs obvious reconciliation. Correct me if you see otherwise.

24184431? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV submission.

Posted automatically (#115042) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

24184281? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#115039) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

24181714? ago

Hi, I started to analyze this manually but ran out of steam (recovering from concussions, but used to be good at this): https://voat.co/v/QRV/3861369/24181603

Appreciate you taking a look and letting me know your thoughts. Two important aspects: Twitter caches that image for 7 days, so we could be right on the edge of the cache, or it was changed 8 days later and thus Twitter got a new version. Second, the second "Card Display" seems relevant which is where I stopped.

24182108? ago

Unless I'm missing something, it doesn't rectify what's on the wayback machine snapshots though...

24182157? ago

Yeah I never got to the end, but I added a nice Twitter thread at the beginning of that comment I linked above.

24181633? ago

Looks like Q won again.

24181624? ago

I was just explaining this to my brother. I can't imagine Q team didn't know that's how this works. My old school HTML paid off. Haha

24181499? ago

Apparently its Ruby. Cant submit links for some reason but it's this thread

twitter.com/QNE_ANQN/status/1269461234400792578?s=19

24181325? ago

Q was saying reconcile the photo with the fact it's being championed by the Obama organization. Not sure why people jumped to the conclusion Q is saying it was posted before his death. Q never said that at all.

24181391? ago

That's true. It seemed to me the implication was in the discrepancy of dates vs the known timeline. Keyword implication.

But I also have to say, in the context of the point you're making, what would there be to reconcile? As if it's shocking that an Obama organization is trying to exploit the situation and we need to reconcile it?

24181312? ago

If anyone understands the significance of 4437, I'm all ears.

I think Q is saying (in pseudocode) that you need to log in to see what he's talking about.

I don't have a twitter account but maybe I'll make one in order to investigate this.

24181198? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#115000) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

24181092? ago

This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#114999) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

24180877? ago

That explains the Q quote "These people are stupid". He was talking about his followers.

Just like the Resident Evil 6 picture.

Just like the Air Force One Picture.

24181335? ago

Who let the nigger in?

24181500? ago

Hey! Black Lives Matter.

24180838? ago

Thumbs up for your research and explanation anon!

24180819? ago

https://twitter.com/TruthandArtTV1/status/1269461735037001728

Truth and Art TV

@TruthandArtTV1

Hahaha!!!! Hey everyone read this thread carefully, you'll be glad you did.

(1) Q just checkmated a pack a demon clowns attacking Q on 8kun. This is so "technical" related (dealing with computer coding) that after Q smoked them Q comes back with

24180640? ago

Yeah I already texted that shit to my buddy who doesn’t follow Q and haven’t heard back yet but now I’m going to have to walk that shit back too.

24180666? ago

Well let's wait. Like I said, maybe 4437 clears it up. I just don't know how it does. But just because I don't know how it does doesn't mean it doesn't.

24180422? ago

Exactly OP. I just posted this is one if those slide threads on the subjects. It needs to go here also because your explanation was what I was asking for.

—-

This is bullshit along with the rest of the posts on this. The article being linked in the tweet is pulling at image from the website not necessarily from the article in question - but the section of the website where the article resides. (I’m sure there is someone here with a web coding background that can explain it better.) [OP just did.]

The same thing is going on in a tweet from the 14th which is three days earlier. It basically changes the image in a tweet without editing the tweet itself for original time and date.

Show me the archive of the tweet in question from the date in question if you can to convince me. Otherwise this is nothing but an effort to slide the forum. I’ve seen it a hundred times since Q pointed us to here. And in a week from now, there will be an MSM article somewhere trolling the QAnon and Hussein tweet with Floyd’s pic conspiracy story. Seen that a hundred times too.

Do your homework. Get the archive of the original tweet on that date - also do the same for the tweet on the 14th. Compare and verify the pic is Floyd. If it is, congrats - we have something. Otherwise GTFO for waisting everyone’s time and flushing our reputation down the toilet again because you are too lazy to do the work, or you are setting us up you motherfucking shill.

24180387? ago

WTF Q?

24180380? ago

Is it real or bullshit? I still can't tell after your post. Serious question.

24180444? ago

Looks like bullshit to me. Again, unless the subsequent post somehow rectifies it.

24180351? ago

Isn’t it python? I also am stuck on this at basically the same spot.

24181240? ago

I think it's pseudocode. Q is using a smartass was of saying "you need to log in".

24181721? ago

someone said Ruby

24181766? ago

Ok, ya, looks like ruby syntax.

In any case, is it pseudocode, or is it maybe part of an actual page scraping script that Q uses?

Q is always telling us to archive offline.

24180366? ago

Not sure. I know what python is, but I don't know python. Not even sure I'd recognize it if I saw it.

24182347? ago

In python, the white space (indentation) has meaning so you don't have brackets or anything else to open and close blocks of statements.

It's really a beautiful language, very well thought out. I only did a little bit with it years ago but if I ever got back into programming I would like to work with it more.