This isn't my thread but I'm going to cross reference it here because something I pointed out in the image of Joe Biden's test result was that he tested positive for SARS-Cov2 rather than COVID-19 which makes you wonder what is actually flying around infecting people..
They are the same thing. NIH correctly identified this virus early on, and still uses the correct name.
But the terrorists at the WHO and CDC (and UN) decided that calling it SARS would make it too familiar to people. So they created a scary name to make it seem like this was something unprecedented, and that everything was unknown.
SARS 1 killed 10%, so if I was a diabolical madman giving a wicked good lab, nice house, hot chicks, and unlimited budget, I would of course start with the SARS model and then throw on some HIV type genomes.....and give it a huge latency period.
Since HIV segments have been found in this one, was wondering whether everyone who caught it would develop some sort of AIDS, eventually.
An alternate name used on BNO News is SARS-CoV-2. Figured they have inside information on Jewish issues; and, since the Pirbright Institute owns the patent for umpteen versions of CoronaVirus as a genome delivery system; and since Erasmus is said to have developed this form of it (and since there are no lawsuits for patent infringement, as well as Erasmus’ financier Bill Gates stating the overt need for a plague to reduce the surplus population by about 85%), I presumed a cooperative effort on the part of Pirbright & Erasmus in manufacturing this virus, then scapegoating the Chinese.
So, in the end, figured “Pirbright/Erasmus SARS-CoV-2” would make a logical full name, (+19 for the year, though there is evidence it was made in 2007); at least until the probable AIDS element manifests itself in a few years (or is released, like this virus, from a WHO lab).
23054472? ago
This video goes over some of what you’re speaking.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kG24gHvSzww&t=2s
23053674? ago
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3719528#
This isn't my thread but I'm going to cross reference it here because something I pointed out in the image of Joe Biden's test result was that he tested positive for SARS-Cov2 rather than COVID-19 which makes you wonder what is actually flying around infecting people..
Is this the tainted version?
23054255? ago
They are the same thing. NIH correctly identified this virus early on, and still uses the correct name.
But the terrorists at the WHO and CDC (and UN) decided that calling it SARS would make it too familiar to people. So they created a scary name to make it seem like this was something unprecedented, and that everything was unknown.
This is an example of "let no crisis go to waste"
23053115? ago
Damn Straight!
Best name for it.
Name they gave it in the lab when they made it.
Motherflippers make a virus, they own it, whether or not they opt to release it in China.
“Pirbright/Erasmus SARS-CoV-2-19,” to be precise.
23053573? ago
where do you get that full name?
SARS 1 killed 10%, so if I was a diabolical madman giving a wicked good lab, nice house, hot chicks, and unlimited budget, I would of course start with the SARS model and then throw on some HIV type genomes.....and give it a huge latency period.
23054317? ago
Ooh!
Since HIV segments have been found in this one, was wondering whether everyone who caught it would develop some sort of AIDS, eventually.
An alternate name used on BNO News is SARS-CoV-2. Figured they have inside information on Jewish issues; and, since the Pirbright Institute owns the patent for umpteen versions of CoronaVirus as a genome delivery system; and since Erasmus is said to have developed this form of it (and since there are no lawsuits for patent infringement, as well as Erasmus’ financier Bill Gates stating the overt need for a plague to reduce the surplus population by about 85%), I presumed a cooperative effort on the part of Pirbright & Erasmus in manufacturing this virus, then scapegoating the Chinese.
So, in the end, figured “Pirbright/Erasmus SARS-CoV-2” would make a logical full name, (+19 for the year, though there is evidence it was made in 2007); at least until the probable AIDS element manifests itself in a few years (or is released, like this virus, from a WHO lab).