Nope. A HEX converter is returning gibberish control characters.

A0i‹ÁÞ)xè²G±ËQQkܝVñ–'9@&

But I know Q did encoder some previous filenames in a similar way. I just need to remember what I used to break it down before.

Could use some help if someone wants to try and break down this string.

8f124130698bc112de2978e8b24719b1cb5114516bdc9d56f10796273940267f

(Just leave out the .jpg)

They're literally Brietbart retweets.

Enjoy the Show...She's playing her part...Her crimes are much higher than Logan Act or sedition...Starts with a T followed by reason...kek

Q is finally shutting down the con that is Jim Watkins and 8kun. Maybe we'll actually hear real Q soon.

ALL FOR A LARP KEK

Epstein didn't kill himself.

Any day now ...

Drink Ovaltine!

Well. All jews ARE petulant faggot shills.

Ask your questions to get what answers we have available. It's always a good idea to do your own research so you can check sources for yourself. Sometimes it may look like an echo chamber, we are only human and have been at this for a couple years. It's kinda like going mountain climbing but not knowing how to tie knots. Until you've learned the knots it's hard to understand the usefulness. We had to make up the knots and we still need to work out some kinks. Falling off the mountain just isn't an option. Understanding the ropes...? I dunno if that analogy works for you but it sounded good in my head.

Yes

Edit: DC is a sewer.

Yes, Q’s latest fails would make that most amusing.

Well, it's tough for Jim Watkins to come up with stuff like that on the fly when he's busy tweaking the source code of his site to create Q proofs.

Missed the picture, huh?

Seems to be happening more often.

Who is getting locked up?

DONT FORGET TO VOTE REPUBLICANS

Eat shit faggot, we've been waiting for the main course for years. It's time to put up or shut up, but this faggotry serves no purpose.

This latest Q fail should serve as an educational tool, but what do you wanna bet it won’t?

Define "soon".

You don't know what you're talking about, do you?

So TRUE... Some q-sters are expanding their thought capability. So many newbies enter hungry for these drops/re-drops; for the growing Army of Patriots.. The plan is fine.... For those tired of the broken record sound of the plan. AND it does sound like a broken record. Take a break.. Take your message of Q and the plan to the streets, the coffee shops, the restaurants, the bars. Many are gently awakening, Hungary for the TRUTH.. Some are showing signs of awakening; plant some seeds of Q and the GREAT AWAKENING will go a long way.. When the time for the seed to sprout; comes. Build some bridges to those still sleeping; they will come.

Yes, what is the profit in dragging out this narrative? If it blows up in Trump's face there will be a huge backlash of angry patriots. So, just keep it going another year ...

We are the news now. Just as before disseminate as is. Pretend your paul revere. Or ben franklins apprentice.

We do but shit some brain dead need help just pretend they are old ladies crossing da street.

Um, are you a fucking idiot?

FALSE - A treaty does most certainly NOT supersede the laws of Nations. This is something John Foster Dulles tried to push, but it is not true. The Constitution's reference to same was to keep in force any treaties that had been signed prior to the signing of the Constitution so that peace could be kept. People like HRC and Obummer wanted to believe they could sign a treaty and do away with our gun laws and any other inconvenient parts of the Constitution. But they were wrong. Sauce - 3 yrs studying Constitutional Law. For easier understanding, this article explains it best:

https://federalexpression.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/treaty-power-and-the-supremacy-clause/

A few quotes from the above article that goes into great depth about this:

**Where does the notion that Treaty Law Supersedes the Constitution Originate?**
It is difficult to know where this myth originated, however, we have an early reference to it. It is entirely justifiable to say that this notion may not have originated with John Foster Dulles, however, it was certainly popularized by his attitudes. Ideas have consequences:

“The treaty making power is an extraordinary power liable to abuse. Treaties make international law and they make domestic law. Under our Constitution treaties become the supreme law of the land. They are indeed more supreme than ordinary laws, for Congressional laws are invalid if they do not conform to the Constitution whereas treaty laws can override the Constitution. Treaties for example, can take powers away from the Congress and give them to the President; they can take powers from the state and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by the Constitutional Bill of Rights.”
John Foster Dulles (April 12, 1952)
Louisville, Kentucky
(Secretary of State Eisenhower Administration)

 Clearly, Mr. Dulles was attempting to exploit a populace unfamiliar with the Constitution. The very fact that he asserted that rights are “given to the people by the Constitutional Bill of Rights” is evidence enough that he was attempting to contort the meaning of the Constitution. Afterall, the Constitution does not give rights, it acknowledges and protects God-given Rights. That is an important distinction because rights given by government can later be withdrawn, but our Bill of Rights asserts that “Congress shall make no law” which would seek to undermine or diminish the natural rights of its citizens.

I have already shown that Mr. Dulles’ interpretation of the Treaty-Making power of our Government is false. However, I am not alone in my opinion. The framers of this clause spoke to its intent. So here are some words from the authors and ratifiers:

I do not conceive that power is given to the President and the Senate to dismember the empire, or alienate any great, essential right. I do not think the whole legislative authority have this power. The exercise of the power must be consistent with the object of the delegation .
— James Madison, “Father of the Constitution”  from Elliott’s Debates

Right, this is getting circular

Q, something needs to be done soon.

5:5?

The "arrests or GTFO" shills are starting to make some sense.

What on earth are we waiting for here?

What do you propose?

The Holidays are the best time for a greatest hits album. This is Q's.

Q mentioned he would not fly that hight again to avoid the conspiracy theorist label. Unfortunately the drops will continue at this depth for some time. We're still waiting for the normies to catch up.

Exactly. Arrests or GTFO.

Future proves past and Q is onto your % fags bs.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3545137/21589336?context=10#

Stop being a Concern fag.

No, next week something big is going to happen, mass arrests.

You will pass the rest of your Christmas holidays as a slave, yes.

-Q

it's seems like most off the Queens colonies are deep state safe zones....

It looks like a storm brewing behind the Eiffel tower, could it be a storm is upon France?

You come here to make comments like this? kek

+/++/+++

Well I can tell you who DOESN'T own our politicians.... it's We The People. They are mostly sold out to the highest bidder, which doesn't include us. The bigger the politician, the more committees he/she sits on, the greater the influence, means higher bids to own them. The lesser players... junior members, those not on committee assignments ..... they get lower bids, but they still take them. The urge to be "owned" and get money, big or small, is just too tempting.

I have ZERO faith in our government right now, and especially the various agencies, including the C_A, NSF, IRS, FBI, et al. I just hope POTUS and Q can blow the entire thing up and hit a reset button for real. I wouldn't mind if they simply fired the entire government civil service roster, send in the military to evacuate the buildings, and start hiring all over again.... those with past civil service employment would be banned from applying for 10 years.

Excellent Question and great answer here -- https://countdowntozerotime.com/2017/02/07/reuters-told-their-reporters-to-cover-donald-trump-like-a-dictator-who-owns-the-media-are-you-really-getting-the-truth/