You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

21574789? ago

We hàve proved over and over over and over that no books were linked before trip code changed. They only linked after the fact. Tags are being used to fool people and you are not not helping by bringing this old slide back to life

21575032? ago

They were linked after the fact— that is, after Q posted with them. But still this does seem like an additional channel of information that may well be intended. These associations are likely being done deliberately so they could have been deliberately done by Q team. unless you’re suggesting that these associations are merely organic, and resulting from the inclusion of Q’s tripcode on sites discussing these particular books. Gaming the SEO extremely well implies knowledge of inner workings of the intentionally opaque PageRank algorithm.

21575277? ago

No outside comms!

They were linked after the fact, that's all anyone needs to know.

You're helping mislead people.

21575349? ago

Maybe they were linked after the fact because Q didn’t know his tripcode before he posted.

21575474? ago

Maybe you're not very bright.

21575494? ago

Maybe

21577983? ago

Use a data queue operation to tie the URL of the book in google books to the tripcode in underlying HTML code. That will enable a query of the tripcode to tie to search results leading to the URL of the book in google books. Right click in on the link of one of the search results and click on view source. Looks something like this. The [ ] are my comments on where shit goes.. the rest is the code.

<div class=“rc”>

<div class=“r”>

<a href=“[INSERT URL]&dq=[INSERT TRIPCODE OR WHATEVER BS YOU WANT TO TIE THE QUERIED WORD TO]&[OTHER LINGO LIKE LANGUAGE/COUNTRY]”>

<br>