A while back I found an article claiming that every tripcode Q has ever used are links to publications that can be found using google books. Simply copy the tripcode and paste it into google books search and you will see for yourself. Here is the link to the article with many of the books and publications listed.
Here is the link:
https://i-uv.com/every-tripcode-userid-used-by-q-points-to-a-book/
I decided to give it a shot with the newest tripcode Q used today and sure enough a publication came up in Google books. It links to "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 : hearing before the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources, United States Senate, One Hundred Eleventh Congress, second session ... March 4, 2010."
Here is the link:
https://books.google.com/books?id=2PtXswEACAAJ&dq=!!Hs1Jq13jV6&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjgoZGHi5jmAhWQzlkKHesOA2sQ6AEwAXoECAAQAg
I think the initial article showing a correlation between Q's tripcodes and publications is something which merits further investigation. Q continually tells us we have more than we know, maybe there are some things we have yet to decode and publications/books we have yet to sift through which can help us see the bigger picture.
-Vet/Patriot WWG1WGA
view the rest of the comments →
21574789? ago
We hàve proved over and over over and over that no books were linked before trip code changed. They only linked after the fact. Tags are being used to fool people and you are not not helping by bringing this old slide back to life
21575032? ago
They were linked after the fact— that is, after Q posted with them. But still this does seem like an additional channel of information that may well be intended. These associations are likely being done deliberately so they could have been deliberately done by Q team. unless you’re suggesting that these associations are merely organic, and resulting from the inclusion of Q’s tripcode on sites discussing these particular books. Gaming the SEO extremely well implies knowledge of inner workings of the intentionally opaque PageRank algorithm.
21575204? ago
People selling books know how seo works.
21575331? ago
Yes, everyone knows generally what helps. Google makes it clear that their ranking algorithm is designed to reward “more relevant” results with a higher ranking, though they don’t publish the algorithm out of a desire to prevent gaming it.
How are these results getting associated with Q’s tripcode? Is it possible that some of these associations were intentionally created by Q team? Or are they merely the results of either people trying to sell books or else just the organic results of the tripcode being mentioned adjacent to discussions these books?
It may be the case that the Q team is able to optimize certain results for their tripcode. I can’t dismiss this possibility just because it might instead be someone else.
21575443? ago
If Q wanted me to read a book why wouldn't he just put it in a drop?
21575484? ago
Maybe it’s just suggested reading?