Nah. I don’t like this... we are witnessing the acquittal of pedo andrew in real time and even the implosion of the entire case!
I haven’t seen the 60 minutes thing, but for the victim to go on a tv show, that’s already bad, very bad news. It’s wrong on so many levels:
The accuser should not appear in such a tv show AT LEAST until she has a verdict that grants her the status of “victim”. Accuser and victim are two very different concepts, going on tv to claim you are something the law has not established you are yet is a huge defeat in itself.
To go fight your case in the enemy’s turf, under the enemy’s rules is a stupid mistake. To let MSM ask the questions and edit the material... gosh, what are you thinking?
To prove my point, what transpires about such interview is a discussion about a picture... VR is claiming to be a victim of trafficking and rape, an under-age sexual slave being held hostage by a ruthless international gang stemming from the top layers of World power... but let’s talk about a picture instead...
And of course they want to talk about the picture!!! Does that picture tell that VR is a victim of trafficking and rape, an under-age sexual slave being held hostage by a ruthless international gang stemming from the top layers of World power?
Let’s summarise: we have a woman go on tv claiming to be something she is not, defending that a picture of happy people having a wonderful time together is real...
My friends, if you can not see this is a deliberate destruction of the case and the beginning of a narrative to delegitimise The Truth and even normalise the entire thing in the sheeple’s minds... we’re being walked into an ambush...
I understand what you're saying. So they using controlled opposition you mean? Show a bit of the truth, and misdirect it all and lets talk about the photos, and not the horrors of what happened.
That photo only proves they know each other. That’s all it proves.
That photo doesn’t establish VR’s age.
Furthermore, that photo tells a very different story than that of abduction, trafficking or rape.
To make that photo the bone of contention of this case, and by association hold it as proof of the crimes and people involved in it is a straight path to exoneration and normalisation!
Expose the crimes, forget the picture. Victims to stay away from MSM until they FINALLY get their day in court.
view the rest of the comments →
21284468? ago
Nah. I don’t like this... we are witnessing the acquittal of pedo andrew in real time and even the implosion of the entire case!
I haven’t seen the 60 minutes thing, but for the victim to go on a tv show, that’s already bad, very bad news. It’s wrong on so many levels:
The accuser should not appear in such a tv show AT LEAST until she has a verdict that grants her the status of “victim”. Accuser and victim are two very different concepts, going on tv to claim you are something the law has not established you are yet is a huge defeat in itself.
To go fight your case in the enemy’s turf, under the enemy’s rules is a stupid mistake. To let MSM ask the questions and edit the material... gosh, what are you thinking?
To prove my point, what transpires about such interview is a discussion about a picture... VR is claiming to be a victim of trafficking and rape, an under-age sexual slave being held hostage by a ruthless international gang stemming from the top layers of World power... but let’s talk about a picture instead...
And of course they want to talk about the picture!!! Does that picture tell that VR is a victim of trafficking and rape, an under-age sexual slave being held hostage by a ruthless international gang stemming from the top layers of World power?
Let’s summarise: we have a woman go on tv claiming to be something she is not, defending that a picture of happy people having a wonderful time together is real...
My friends, if you can not see this is a deliberate destruction of the case and the beginning of a narrative to delegitimise The Truth and even normalise the entire thing in the sheeple’s minds... we’re being walked into an ambush...
21284755? ago
I understand what you're saying. So they using controlled opposition you mean? Show a bit of the truth, and misdirect it all and lets talk about the photos, and not the horrors of what happened.
21284942? ago
That photo only proves they know each other. That’s all it proves.
That photo doesn’t establish VR’s age.
Furthermore, that photo tells a very different story than that of abduction, trafficking or rape.
To make that photo the bone of contention of this case, and by association hold it as proof of the crimes and people involved in it is a straight path to exoneration and normalisation!
Expose the crimes, forget the picture. Victims to stay away from MSM until they FINALLY get their day in court.