Oh FFS, I’ve been on Disney cruise ships and I’ve snorkeled in these waters. No abducted kids being shuttled around. No human sacrifices of children sailing these ships. It’s just a cruise port excursion for snorkeling. That’s it. The proximity of snorkel stops to Little St James is not even remotely enough to make this case.
By this logic, that incriminates Norwegian Cruise Lines, Royal Caribbean and Carnival...because they all port in St Thomas as well. Pretty much every major cruise line that sails the Caribbean does.
Stop making this stupid argument. It’s only serves to make us look like idiots.
Posted automatically (#72640) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
I’m not the one suggesting the all or nothing fallacy.
Just because a port excursion for snorkeling lists Buck and St James as destinations, it doesn’t mean human trafficking is occurring. Like I said - every other cruise line porting there utilizes the same third party shore excursion vendors. How do you reconcile mention of St James in a shore excursion advertisement as proof of wrongdoing with these other cruise lines not sharing in the guilt.
It’s a stupid equivalency that makes us look like retards.
The original accusation is that DCL has an excursion to little st James...therefore disney is guilty. That’s not proof of shit. But everyone in this post is frothing at the mouth at the certainty of it.
If such a rediculously tenuous connection is drawn from this, how do you exclude the other cruise lines?
Moreover....the advertisement copy presented by Q is NOT DCL’s, but what appears to be a third party excursion company not endorsed by DCL...and using disneyish graphics to attract cruisers (which is extremely common in these ports).
So again, tell me why mention of st James, in an advertisement that’s not Disney’s....is sure fire fucking evidence that Disney is engaged in human trafficking.
I’m not here saying that Disney is innocent. I’m saying the fucking case present here against them is thinner than a meth ho on a 5 week binge.
Make this case more solid before throwing around these assertions and we won’t look like IdiotFags.
Third party excursion operator offering snorkel excursions to st James and buck island using non-disney castle graphics -> Disney Cruise Line guilty of Human Trafficking
By that same logic any other cruise line feeding cruisers into that third party operator would be guilty.
...and I’m not the one having a melt down over this. The people frothing at the mouth that Disney is guilty based on this flawed line of thinking are.
It’s mind boggling to observe how loony someone has to be to make this connection....and it’s people that make these connections without a shred of research, are who are most responsible for this movement not being taken seriously by anyone.
One more thing....the advertisement that Q copied in his post was not, I repeat not, a DCL advertisement. Anyone that does a modicum of research would realize that. It’s an advertisement of a third party vendor - that does not appear to be a vendor used by DCL.
Does that mean Q is drawing an erroneous connection? Or is this particular vendor trying to attract DCL cruisers for nefarious purposes by putting up a picture of a castle with the word “magical” (which btw, is not DCL signage)
This whole post seems to draw a conclusion that’s very different from the one that some of you have willingly jumped to.
view the rest of the comments →
21239668? ago
Oh FFS, I’ve been on Disney cruise ships and I’ve snorkeled in these waters. No abducted kids being shuttled around. No human sacrifices of children sailing these ships. It’s just a cruise port excursion for snorkeling. That’s it. The proximity of snorkel stops to Little St James is not even remotely enough to make this case.
By this logic, that incriminates Norwegian Cruise Lines, Royal Caribbean and Carnival...because they all port in St Thomas as well. Pretty much every major cruise line that sails the Caribbean does.
Stop making this stupid argument. It’s only serves to make us look like idiots.
21265205? ago
This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#72640) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
21254173? ago
I agree with your take on this.
21240766? ago
So, you didn't see it therefore it didn't happen.
Additionally you suggest the "All or Nothing" fallacy, meaning they all have to be guilty. Seems like a stupid argument to me.
21241616? ago
I’m not the one suggesting the all or nothing fallacy.
Just because a port excursion for snorkeling lists Buck and St James as destinations, it doesn’t mean human trafficking is occurring. Like I said - every other cruise line porting there utilizes the same third party shore excursion vendors. How do you reconcile mention of St James in a shore excursion advertisement as proof of wrongdoing with these other cruise lines not sharing in the guilt.
It’s a stupid equivalency that makes us look like retards.
21241656? ago
But you just did suggest the all or nothing fallacy. You suggest that if Disney is guilty then ALL cruise lines are involved. This is poor logic.
21241853? ago
No I didn’t! Read carefully.
The original accusation is that DCL has an excursion to little st James...therefore disney is guilty. That’s not proof of shit. But everyone in this post is frothing at the mouth at the certainty of it.
If such a rediculously tenuous connection is drawn from this, how do you exclude the other cruise lines?
Moreover....the advertisement copy presented by Q is NOT DCL’s, but what appears to be a third party excursion company not endorsed by DCL...and using disneyish graphics to attract cruisers (which is extremely common in these ports).
So again, tell me why mention of st James, in an advertisement that’s not Disney’s....is sure fire fucking evidence that Disney is engaged in human trafficking.
I’m not here saying that Disney is innocent. I’m saying the fucking case present here against them is thinner than a meth ho on a 5 week binge.
Make this case more solid before throwing around these assertions and we won’t look like IdiotFags.
21242128? ago
I did read. You are asserting if Disney is guilty then others must also be.
And nobody said Disney definitely is, but that digging should be done.
Dude take a xanax, you need a tranq or something.
Christ given all the Disney pedo rumors and links to date it isn't hard to imagine that they could be doing something shady here....
21242464? ago
You said my logic was flawed here’s yours:
Third party excursion operator offering snorkel excursions to st James and buck island using non-disney castle graphics -> Disney Cruise Line guilty of Human Trafficking
By that same logic any other cruise line feeding cruisers into that third party operator would be guilty.
...and I’m not the one having a melt down over this. The people frothing at the mouth that Disney is guilty based on this flawed line of thinking are.
It’s mind boggling to observe how loony someone has to be to make this connection....and it’s people that make these connections without a shred of research, are who are most responsible for this movement not being taken seriously by anyone.
21242624? ago
I didn't say Disney was guilty. Please find where I said that.
Good luck.
21239952? ago
Q confirmed it. Eat shit.
https://qmap.pub/read/3497
21241715? ago
One more thing....the advertisement that Q copied in his post was not, I repeat not, a DCL advertisement. Anyone that does a modicum of research would realize that. It’s an advertisement of a third party vendor - that does not appear to be a vendor used by DCL.
Does that mean Q is drawing an erroneous connection? Or is this particular vendor trying to attract DCL cruisers for nefarious purposes by putting up a picture of a castle with the word “magical” (which btw, is not DCL signage)
This whole post seems to draw a conclusion that’s very different from the one that some of you have willingly jumped to.
21241554? ago
No he didn’t. He drew attention to it. Big difference.
Plus....
‘Disinformation is necessary’
21239893? ago
It does, makes this community look retarded by trying to connect it to anything with the island with out more solid info
21239961? ago
So is Q retarded asshole?
https://qmap.pub/read/3497
21241889? ago
No, you are for interpreting his drop the way you are...