This M_aterial is important to read. That is why I have reproduced it here.
Thanks.
<
START
PART A >
Exposing the Truth
https://exposinginfragard.blogspot.com/2014/02/the-case-against-michael-aquino-satanic.html
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
The 'Conspiracy' Against Michael Aquino – Satanic Pedophile (sic > s/)
Written by Anthony Forwood
For those who don’t know, Michael Aquino was a Psychological Warfare Specialist in the US Army from 1968 until 1990, when he was involuntarily discharged as a result of investigations into his involvement in the ritual sexual abuse of children at the Presidio Day Care Center in San Francisco. Throughout this same time, he has also been a devout satanist and self-confessed neo-Nazi. He joined Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan in 1969, staying until 1975 when he left to start his own Temple of Set, which has been in operation ever since.
Please note here that both psyops and satanism involve using many levels of deception and coercion to manipulate the perceptions of others for ulterior motives, so these are skills that Aquino is very familiar with and very comfortable in using. He is also an expert in propaganda and skilled in techniques for disseminating misinformation/disinformation, and using misdirection, confusion tactics, isolation techniques, and revisionism. Therefore, he will certainly use these skills to defend himself against the truth of his actions.
Michael Aquino explains that his name keeps coming up in pedophile-ring cases because he’s the victim of a conspiracy (a ‘black bag job’, as he calls it). He bases this on the fact that he’s a satanist and so people just automatically hate him because of it. Unfortunately for him, making such a bad choice in lifestyle and philosophy doesn’t excuse him from anything, although in his particular case it certainly does lend weight to the allegations against him and even invites them, so he shouldn’t really complain about it. He tends to keep his perceptions of all this bad publicity focused strictly on the Presidio child abuse case in which he was a central figure during the 1980s, since that’s the only one he’s ever had to legally defend himself against (so far). Even in this one isolated case, he only dares to focus on it as far as his own limited version of the facts go, and he totally avoids acknowledging the larger body of evidence that implicates him personally. Similarly, he totally overlooks the longer history of events he’s been implicated in by various sources who are far removed from one another and who couldn’t possibly be engaged in any sort of conspiracy against him.
Whatever the case, I’m not going to attempt to detail all of the evidence against Michael Aquino here, since there’s far too much of it for this short article. I merely want to put his claim of conspiracy into proper perspective, in order to show how absurd it really is.
Time after time, Michael Aquino has been pointed at as a ruthlessly evil defiler and abuser of the most innocent and defenseless among us – young children – and it was as early as 1980 that the putrid history of his involvement in pedophilia and mind control can be traced back to (at least in the public records), but it probably goes back much further. The following provides a short historical record of events that ties Aquino to a larger criminal syndicate operating through the US government, and reveals his position within it.
See Part B >
view the rest of the comments →
21720999? ago
Appendix Part 4
Downing was in Germany applying "some of the findings we got." He set up "some things" at Army bases stateside. "At the time of my leaving, my role … as human ecology expert was taken up by another officer, a Michael Aquino, who was trying out these [mind control] principles in the context of Anton LaVey's church."30
Reports surfaced in the 1980s that Aquino plied his knowledge of "human ecology" at the Temple of Set, as well. He refers to the case that drew national media attention as the "Presidio Scam," but the Army’s own evaluation weighed the ritual molestation charges and found them credible.
"Regarding children," Dale Seago says, "I don’t know how he feels about them in general. I do know that he virtually hates his son, Dorien." Aquino has always felt that Dorien is not really his son "by his first wife, Janet. If he felt he could get away with it – and he probably didn’t mean this literally – he would happily go into [Dorien's] room at night and smother him with pillows."
Ethical, responsible Michael Aquino was accused by the U.S. Army CID on August 11, 1989 of "Conspiracy, Kidnapping, Sodomy, Indecent Acts or Liberties With a Child, False Swearing, Intentional Noncompliance With Article 30 Uniform Code of Military Justice, Maltreatment of a Subordinate and Conduct Unbecoming an Officer," in connection with the Presidio charges. After the High Setian sued the Army to have his name stricken from the title block of the report, the court investigated and a decision was handed down by the Commanding General of the Army CID on September 28, 1990: "Plaintiff remains titled for Conspiracy, Kidnapping, Sodomy, Indecent Acts and False Swearing."31
Aquino’s pleas of innocence notwithstanding, there is little doubt that molestation occurred at the Presidio. An internal investigator told Diana Napolis, a San Diego County social worker, "he believed at least 20 pre-schoolers had been molested." Even the FBI’s Kenneth Lanning, a staunch ritual abuse debunker, has stated publicly that many children were sexually abused at the Child Development Center.32
The intelligence sector and its mind control cults have made extensive use of front organizations like the False Memory Syndrome Foundation – many of the professionals on the FMSF board have engaged in illicit classified mind control experiments, often involving children – and friendly contacts in the media to characterize ritual child abuse as an "urban legend" and "false memories" concocted by therapists to reap fraudulent medical insurance claims.
Contrarily, The Journal of Child Abuse & Neglect reported in 1993 that most therapists are extremely reluctant to treat ritual abuse survivors: "One of the first complications in the evaluation of ritualistic abuse cases is the frequent disbelief and skepticism on the part of professionals" encountering "the bizarre and extreme nature of the allegations." As therapists and police investigators gather reports of "ritualistic abuse from across the nation, and as adult and child victims disclose their experiences, evidence for the veracity of these cases accumulates." Another common deterrent to therapist involvement is fear instilled by "threats to evaluators … communicated via the children or experienced directly. Even when no overt threat exists, the horrifying nature of the allegations can engender a fearful [avoidance] response on the part of clinicians."33
The confusion bred by underhanded "experts" with a monopoly on media access gave rise to widespread ignorance. The issue of ritual abuse (a form of mind control) has provoked widespread skepticism, fundamentalist religious hysteria, fear, and even some legitimate reporting here and there.
Material evidence of the abuse is critical but hard to come by. In the Presidio case, medical evidence supported the psychological evaluation of the children. Five or more of them had a sexually transmitted infection. "A stir was created when the media announced that several of the children had been diagnosed with chlamydia," Aquino has written. "However, the Army later announced the tests were unreliable. No retesting of the children was ever conducted. Chlamydia can be transmitted by direct contact with any mucous membrane [such as mouth or eyes]. No testing of the children's parents for this disease was conducted." Aquino claims to have medical records confirming that he has never had the disease.
There is no doubt that children at the center were infected, whether or not he was responsible. Contrary to Aquino’s explanation, the Department of Health and Human Services [http://www.4woman.gov/faq/stdchlam.htm] reports that chlamydia, like HIV, is contracted NOT merely by contact with mucous membranes, but "during sexual intercourse via the exchange of bodily fluids through mucous membranes in the anus, mouth and genital areas."
Michael Aquino's contention that the children were "not retested" raises questions. Several laboratory tests, according to the DHHS, are conducted to confirm the presence of chlamydial infection and distinguish it from gonorrhea. And once a child is on medication, another test is standard procedure to determine if the child is still infected. And "because there are often no symptoms for chlamydial infection, someone infected may unknowingly pass the bacteria to their SEXUAL partners."
Aquino has yet to explain how SEVERAL children from the Presidio came to have sexual contact with the same infected pedophile outside the school. There is obviously a much higher probability that someone at the Presidio passed the disease through sexual contact.
Conspiracy Theory
Aquino’s claim to innocence couldn’t stanch the flow of headlines: "ARMY SAYS CONSTITUTION LETS SATANIST HOLD TOP SECRET JOB – PRESIDIO CARE CENTER FIRST TO FACE ARMY SCRUTINY – SATANISM LINKED TO SCORES OF S.F. CHILD ABUSE CASES – WORLDWIDE PROBE OF ARMY CENTERS – PENTAGON TACKLES PRESIDIO MOLEST CASE …"
Michael Aquino has consistently claimed that the Army CID investigation was a conspiracy motivated by military intolerance of his religion. In response to Aquino’s debunkery: "This investigation was not a ‘witchhunt.’ Plaintiff was not targeted because of his religious beliefs. In fact, as plaintiff repeatedly points out … the Army has been aware of [Aquino's] religious beliefs throughout his career and has not interfered with his religious practices. The sole reasons for this investigation and the CID decision … are the facts that point to plaintiff's sexual abuse." Kinsey Adams-Thompson, "in a completely public setting, identifies … a man who sodomized her" and forced her to "place her mouth on his penis."
Based on Aquino’s "witchhunt" thesis, one would have to accept "that there was a giant conspiracy between the parents, the daughter, the psychiatrist, the child psychiatrist that treated the girl, between the CID agents who investigated the case, between the military policemen and investigators … and between the officials in the Army Criminal Law Division who also reviewed the case."34
On May 31, 1991, Patrick Lisowski, an attorney representing the Army in Aquino’s lawsuit, opined that it was only possible to buy his claims if one also believes that "a mother and a father instructed their daughter to fabricate this story of child molestation," then "pick out someone who they didn't like" and embedded "in her somehow the fact that this was the man" who’d molested her.
See Appendix Part 5