OK folks [docfag here] the way to address this is to start sending letters of complaint to the medical boards that regulate the doctors that have started the treatment.
The treatments are not only unethical but they have no evidence base, are not FDA approved and are not licensed. It is outside the scope of a medical practitioner's practice to prescribe these drugs but the reason they get away with it is that nobody complains.
Every doctor is susceptible to any genuine complaint, irrespective of whether they have treated that particular patient. So I could treat someone and the relative could complain, for instance, or even a member of the public could complain that I am some weird maverick. The boards are then compelled to investigate *and report back to the complainant.
Please, please, start complaining to the medical boards. If you need any help formulating letters I will try and help you. I am not based in the US so I can't write the complaint(s) but anybody that is the US, and esp Texas, can. Most medical boards in the US (AFAIK) are state-based.
Can we get a little ground game here? What is the relevant board in question? Actual website, contacts, emails/phone numbers? This story boils a cauldron deep inside me, so much so that I have to be cautious that it's not a liberal/media setup to anger on purpose.
I'm going to dig that judge. This judgment is a complete farce. Why would a protective, caring father be stripped of visitation/custody rights? The judge, and the jury must all be post modernist liberal dimwits. In Texas? What are the odds? How did this case end up in front of this judge? How was the jury selected? The father PUSHED for a jury trial, and this was the turnout? Something smells like fish and it's not just the mother here.
view the rest of the comments →
21039778? ago
OK folks [docfag here] the way to address this is to start sending letters of complaint to the medical boards that regulate the doctors that have started the treatment.
The treatments are not only unethical but they have no evidence base, are not FDA approved and are not licensed. It is outside the scope of a medical practitioner's practice to prescribe these drugs but the reason they get away with it is that nobody complains.
Every doctor is susceptible to any genuine complaint, irrespective of whether they have treated that particular patient. So I could treat someone and the relative could complain, for instance, or even a member of the public could complain that I am some weird maverick. The boards are then compelled to investigate *and report back to the complainant.
Please, please, start complaining to the medical boards. If you need any help formulating letters I will try and help you. I am not based in the US so I can't write the complaint(s) but anybody that is the US, and esp Texas, can. Most medical boards in the US (AFAIK) are state-based.
21040022? ago
Can we get a little ground game here? What is the relevant board in question? Actual website, contacts, emails/phone numbers? This story boils a cauldron deep inside me, so much so that I have to be cautious that it's not a liberal/media setup to anger on purpose.
I'm going to dig that judge. This judgment is a complete farce. Why would a protective, caring father be stripped of visitation/custody rights? The judge, and the jury must all be post modernist liberal dimwits. In Texas? What are the odds? How did this case end up in front of this judge? How was the jury selected? The father PUSHED for a jury trial, and this was the turnout? Something smells like fish and it's not just the mother here.
21040054? ago
Jesus fucking christ.
What would you say if this Dr.Anne Georgulas of this pediatrics practice is the mother?
Notice anything in the logo? Something is off. It's fishy as fuck, and I'm afraid to say it out-loud without anon help.