Watching the latest attempts by Democrats and MSM to push for the impeachment of the President got me wondering. Putting emotion aside (my natural incination is outrage at such an attempt) AND knowing that Q has on many occasions told us
a) Patriots are in control
b) The retention of the Senate was the target (2018)
c) That many of the worst DS offenders are now "hostage" and playing a role, presumably defined and directed by white hats. "what makes a good movie?"
Is it not possible that an impeachment trial is exactly what dirty Dems have been instructed to push for, albeit with the look of a libtard grass roots origen? With that in mind, let's turn to the process of Impeachment, which is governed by the Constitution.
Though the actual action of impeachment in the House looks a lot like votes on any ordinary bill or resolution, the Senate is where things start to look quite different — because the Senate is hosting a trial, something it very rarely does.
In this trial, the House of Representatives acts as a prosecutor — designating certain impeachment managers to argue their side in the Senate. The president’s lawyers are the defense team — the president does not have to appear in person and historically has not. The chief justice of the Supreme Court presides and is responsible for making procedural rulings during the trial — however, the Senate can vote to overrule his decisions.
In addition to effectively being the jury that votes to acquit or convict at the end, senators get to decide how the trial is conducted. For Clinton’s trial, the Senate decided on a target end date, whether to allow House prosecutors to depose witnesses (the House wantedto depose 15, the Senate let them depose three), and whether to hear live witness testimony (they chose not to). Senators can make these decisions either through unanimous consent or by voting on a proposal put forth by Senate leadership.
So - it is in the Senate that the true action would take place, and obviously this is now controlled by the GOP, and arguably after the purges of the last two years is more reliably oriented to the good guys.
The trial would be the BIGGEST domestic and probably international news event in a decade. Every normie in the US and half the world would pay attention to it, and there would be no way that the MSM could justify not televising it. At trial, the defence would consist of very competant trial lawyers (Trump's own), and would be well within their rights to introduce "mitigating" and exculpitory evidence in the President's defence (ie all the treasonous and outrageous use by the Obama admin State dept and Intelligence apparatus to target political opponents, violation of consitutional rights of American citizens, collusion with foreign actors, etc) - what a stage to drop it ALL. Witnesses (FISA court judges anyone?) would be called to corroberate, documents (FISA, etc) tabled, etc etc.
And all the while, the GOP has the numbers in the Senate and therefore controls the shit show. Head of the Supreme Court Roberts presiding, as an officer of the court, when provided with evidence of un-charged criminal wrong doing is duty bound to refer all probable criminal acts for review by DOJ for prosecution.
If Trump / Q are in control, and I believe they are, then this may indeed be what they are manipulating the Dirty Dems towards, and if not then there is absolutely no fucking way that Pelosi is gonna let the House vote to impeach no matter what they pretend to think. These people are stupid, but probably not that stupid, at least not all of them.
Anyway, probably wrong about this but thought I'd through it out for debate.
20894071? ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#67703) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
20784581? ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#66100) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
20711045? ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#65040) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
20711007? ago
This submission was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.
Posted automatically (#65039) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.
20704993? ago
Of course it is. What better way is there to show that this is all a farce than to wait until they are in the middle of impeachment proceedings then release the declass. It would be blatantly obvious that the whole impeachment thing is to remove POTUS to protect their own corrupt asses. I believe POTUS is hoping they'll go down that route. People don't like impeachment talk in general, imagine what it'd be like when it comes out that it's a political hit job to hide the evil they were/are doing. It'd be the end of the Dems for generations.
20703000? ago
At this point, nothing is out of the realm of possibility. It's always good (and smart) to think outside the box.
20702790? ago
Team Trump has been waiting for the retards to impeach. I'm quite sure it'll backfire on the DS like at their other futile attempts to squelch God's Man for this hour. #EnjoyTheShow
20701072? ago
Interdasting! It would certainly be a popcorn-worthy "show", not wouldn't it. And the DECLAS would precede the evidence being presented for the trial.
And of course, let's not forget: Trump did NOTHING wrong, so he's automatically innocent. It would be a major shit show of epic (and democrat crushing) proportions.
20700629? ago
anyway, very interesting movie to watch.
20700616? ago
problem is if the media make up all lies now, what stops them making up new lies in the impeachment? what would normies learn from all the information? it will be a contested process, what would make them believe the information?
20700550? ago
Yes, Trump resigns before impeachment and Launches TrumpTV
20700896? ago
Can you run a TV network from a jail cell?
20701417? ago
Yes
20700542? ago
Patriots in control does not mean there is no struggle. The old Guard is still strong, but they can no longer direct outcome, and Patrots get to choose which path to play, the outcome is the same--they win. It take guts though for POTUS to choose to go through the impeachment process. For this I admire his courage.
20704698? ago
EXACTLY!!!! A centuries old establishment isn't going to lie down, and disband because we're having a "gotcha" moment in history.
20700509? ago
No way impeachment could be part of "The Plan." Plan is to be anti-divisive to avoid civil war. Impeachment is not that.
Impeachment might actually happen, though. What happens then depends on whether there are enough patriots in the Senate to set fair rules, or if they will do what they have always done, which is to support the establishment over the People.
The best counter to impeachment would be for REAL trials to simultaneously begin for the traitors -- and make them public. That assumes, of course, that Trump and/or Q are "in control."
20702320? ago
The plan is to mitigate civil war as much as possible.
Make no mistake. Every road forward contains volatility.
Markets
Economies
Political lines
Families wlll be effected
No paradigm change here without some PAIN. It will be felt and we were avidly told to prepare. We were not told repeatedly to prepare because of a coming lack of volatility - that entire paradigm / point does not reconcile.
What is coming is an attempt to bring down the house and change the old guard. The question is how would one go about doing that and cause the least ripple effect? How do you usher in a new topology, instill faith and accountability, and protect as many as possible?
A fever pitch is coming. They have wanted trump gone / impeached since he was elected. If they think they can get what they want you better believe every single last one of them will be paying attention. What we need is eyes. We need the whites of their eyes ready so when the salvo is dropped they can try to turn away but the slow motion car wreck is going to happen and they will be glued to it.
We're priming them for an "AH HA MOMENT" when they all fucking snap out of it and say "Wow. Nothing was as I understood it - but there were people I thought were fucking crazy and wished me ill that actually loved me the entire time."
20700708? ago
If the Q team has time-scrying capabilities, then impeachment very well could be part of the plan! It's like playing chess but all losing moves are called out for you. Very difficult to lose then!
20700773? ago
Fuck off with the time travel shit.
20700800? ago
Why? Have you looked into the Nikola Tesla/John Trump (President Trump's uncle) connection? I started with "if" anyway, so fuck off with the fucking off.
20700159? ago
I've been thinking the same thing. The dems are screaming for execution now. What can they say when it turns around on them? If they say those punishments don't apply to them, lots more people will wake up to what is really going on. I so look forward to that day because my friends are constantly saying they can't wait for another dem to get in office and return things to the way they were. I will probably bite my tongue off to keep from saying "I told you so."
20701148? ago
We really should publish this comment in Wikipedia as a perfect example of mental gymnastics.
20701690? ago
Impeachment is a political process, not a legal one. There is no legal standard for the charges. It only decides if the target must leave office. It just comes down to votes.
If there are to be criminal charges, that would be have to proceed via the regular justice system after the target is ejected from office.
20701989? ago
They will be doing what u say, after he leaves office unless he kills the cabal while he holds the stick.
20699975? ago
Interesting! However, much of the needed defense evidence would likely be classified, limiting the public's ability to hear it and judge for ourselves.
20700227? ago
“Defense evidence”? Could u elaborate?
20699808? ago
Interesting idea OP. I have been wondering all along why the impeachment thing didn’t die after the last election. They clearly cannot carry it off so why keep at it? Most Americans are woefully ignorant about how government works, but one wouldn’t think so of elected representatives. Most of them are lawyers!
How do you [legally] introduce evidence? (Q asked something like that)
20700236? ago
I thought this was the commonly understood take on Q.
Look at the first 100 posts.
Under no obscurity or ambivalence does Q state that massive riots are being planned and that society will be at a complete fever pitch.
The investigations had to be protected but when things go public there are going to be ripples in the pool - all that can be done is to mitigate the ripples as much as possible.
If we are here and lay credence to Q the story has always been that a point will come where society will be triggered at a massive level approaching civil war and that will be the point where we get massive DECLAS and key arrests
20699474? ago
Perhaps, however Q getting curb-stomped into oblivion by the deep state (8chan deplatforming), Epstein being assassinated by the deep state, our children being mass murdered in false flag school shootings by the deep state and the House being stolen by massive election fraud by the deep state... suggests otherwise.
20704628? ago
Q getting curb-stomped has no bearing on anything being carried out. We don't need Q drops any longer. We have plenty of info to carry us through to 2100 and beyond. These impeachment hearings, if held, are going to produce the damning evidence against Biden, and most likely Obama re: Ukraine. (How does one introduce evidence?) They continually shoot themselves in the foot.
20699712? ago
Agreed. It doesn't seem like things are going in a good direction based on these facts alone.
20705888? ago
Impeachment does suck up all the news time for as long as the Dems want it to. MSM will be all impeachment all the time. Assuming Trump wins reelection, the Dems will have a hard time playing the impeachment card again. No ammunition left.
20703180? ago
Look weak when you are strong...
20699551? ago
20701096? ago
Engaging the pedo-shills. I know... it's fun right? They just keep harping on the same "points" over and over - while we watch the show. Despite their "look here, not there" talking points, there are TONS going on and it's unprecedented. We who are woke (and not pedos scared of our doors being kicked in) understand we're at war, and trust our military, POTUS and Q.
20700209? ago
Why all of the gymnastics just to arrest someone for egregious crimes? Just arrest them and show the fucking evidence? Beats having to rig an election for the entire congress and have to go through impeachment doesn’t it? Show the fucking crimes and if the leftist sheep get it then good, if they don’t then thats ok too, it won’t change anything.
20700573? ago
Maybe there was no crime and it was all a ride to keep a motivated base that would otherwise be upset about fiscal responsibility and corruption?
Naw, that can't be it, must be the other thing.
20701962? ago
I disagree with your claim and reference comey not having charges brought by the doj.
20702231? ago
Actually Comey not being charged fully support what I said
20702591? ago
My angle with it is that one could argue that he committed crimes and one could argue that he didn’t however the fact that Barr didn’t even attempt to bring charges, to me says that they are trying to “cover-up” for actual crimes.
20703513? ago
Or there were none
20703759? ago
You’re joking right?
20701116? ago
ding ding ding
We have a winner over here.
20699634? ago
8chan was curb-stomped, whether you like it or not.
There's no reason to believe otherwise... and wish-thinking is not a valid reason.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Wish-thinking.
Wrong again. There have been no major arrests.
20703164? ago
There's logic behind the original statements and your rebuttals are just piss takes based on your own negativity. You might end up being right, but only if this whole thing turns out to be a game of checkers and not the grand chess match it appears to be.
20699467? ago
Sounds perfectly reasonable to me. As stupid as it is some on the left are positively foaming at the mouth for impeachment. It would be a humiliating defeat, but we cannot overestimate how blinded by fear and hatred they have become.
20700240? ago
I thought this is about justice? Not revenge or humiliation? U sadists can have the humiliation, I want fcuking justice and I want the children of the world to be safe.