As most of you know ghislain maxwell was recently spotted in public for the first time in years posing for a photo op while reading "The Book of Honor: The Secret Lives and Deaths of CIA Operatives". It was quickly discovered that a amazon user by the name of "G. Maxwell" had left a review for that book for the kindle version that very same day. That account and review can be found here.
https://www.ama zon.com/gp/profile/amzn1.account.AEI4E66VGJAOZIUFDV5E2NSL42IQ/ref=cm_cr_getr_mb_gw_btm?ie=UTF8 (had to break it up to post, just remove the space)
Now when this information came out, people came out of the woodwork to debunk that it was actually Ghislain Maxwell, saying things like shes a brit and would have spelled "realize" as "realise" (while not taking note that she actually spelled 'realized' instead of 'realize' she says "it helped me realized that my friend" maybe there is something to that in itself but that's not why we're here. Another debunking claim is that in one of her earlier reviews (that dates back 7 years) is that she mentions having a husband, and Ghislain Maxwell is not married.
So naturally I went looking for this review when I noticed something very peculiar. I noticed this review which I am going to copy and paste word for word...
"Another Great Jack Daniels Book. A Fascinating BaDguy Who Wreaks Havoc On Chicago Leaving Jack To Save The City Of skokie And Herself. A Thrill A Minute."
Do you see it? Every word but one is capitalized, with 'BaDguy' having an extra letter capitalized. I thought maybe this was just how this person typed, but some reviews hold this format while others do not, she switches back and forth and is clearly a coded message. To type a message in this format actually takes quiet a bit of work and is absolutely intentional. Go ahead, write your comment capitalizing every word, you'll quickly see that is something you have to knowingly and intentionally do. Here's another one of her reviews....
"This Is A Fun Story Reminiscent Of Stephanie PLum. It's Well Plotted And Has Some Great Characters. I Haven't Read The First Two Books BUt Will Go Back And Pick TheM Up."
This has three words with multiple capital letters "PLum" "BUt" and TheM, but what I find odd about this one is that she decided to read the 3rd book in a series first? Why? That doesn't make any sense.
Anyways I just thought this was incredibly odd and thought more eyes should be on it. Is this gematria? Another code? Somebody will figure it out, but im absolutely convinced this is absolutely ghislain's amazon account. Hope this helps.
view the rest of the comments →
20250781? ago
Anons...
I'm starting to fall for this gematria shit. I always cast it aside as drivel gibberish. This GM amazon stuff though...There's too much relevant results, it's too much of a coincidence.
This is when I remembered something: I noticed all the numbers next to the results. I believe those numbers churn the value in a direction that the maker of the code wants. It's kind of like padding the generates a result you want. Think about trying to find a collision in a hashing algorithm. Lets say you want a hash to read something specific. Like a bitcoin address for wikileaks that starts with "1wikileaks8432otiuhasljd...etc." In the bitcoin community they're called vanity addresses. To create a vanity you need to randomly guess private keys, and hash them until you get a collision with the address you want. When a certain phrase is meant to generate, the numbers applied after the phrase could be that padding needed to generate the result you're looking for.
Bear with me, it'll get good.
Speaking of bitcoin: On October 27th 2016, a bitcoin PGP message was posted to the bitcoin blockchain. The message started with "Fools rush in where angels fear to tread." What followed was this:
Then there was a terminal bash command after the message that used the last phrase (that ended with DAK mind you...anyone remember that?)
The resulting message reads:
Those numbers sure do look familiar. What does consensus omnium mean? Why is it relevant to everything that's happened the past few years? What is Q? What has it done?
You all should start plugging those phrases from this blockchain message into gematrix.org and tell me what you think.
Last thing: an unclaimed PGP code on the blockchain which is permanently resilient against censorship...who do you think would need such information? Provide the private keys for this message? Is it a way to prove who you are and the content of the message? Think JA.
20251415? ago
Hi it's The NumberFag here.
I did all those decodes on this thread and others.
I will do some analysis of the information you have posted in detail and reply in due course.
Thanks for having faith in this method of communication and me.
FYI, after today's breakthroughs, I just about have it all busted wide open.
I am concerned about posting the whole thing in case I shouldn't for OP_Sec reasons, but it seems it has been left for us to find now that 8chan is down.
Watch this space for a much more technical breakdown, and my personal analysis.
I have been researching Q from the first day, and was on 8Chan often.
20251493? ago
I've already pulled some interesting tidbits from the DAK string. I'm officially sold that this is deliberate. Too many coincidences. Considering what we've done all along since 10/2016, what we've revealed with open source data, these strings, which I believe are from Julian Assange's DMS, are discussing/revealing a lot of relevant info.
For example: this name keeps showing up as very high level "Vicar of Lucifer." I got this name from these gematrix outputs.
Steven James Dishon
A cursory DDG search starts to activate the almonds.
20259103? ago
I've seen his name a lot also. Like, nearly every DS name we know of, will pop up this name. And tons of other searches I've done also. It can't be coincidence. So, do we dig on this Steven James Dishon?
20251506? ago
Excellent work. We will have this solved in no time.