If you see assertions "nobody wants to do any research", without evidence, and totally contradicting the many autists worldwide who do research, and post their findings on Q research 8ch, and here, or if you see posts on the front page with lots of upvoats, of supposed Q anons spewing RACE WAR rhetoric/narrative (which totally contradicts Q's postings, "Patriots have no skin color", "They want race wars", see https://qanon.pub), or they claim "If true" ridiculous bullshit like "If RBG being dead is true...then....then....CHARGE EVERY SUPREME COURT JUSTICE FOR TREASON" (as if they are all corrupt, including Gorsuch and Kavanaugh, which RBG dead being true would "prove", that's messed up logic) without evidence, or they are convinced of or doing controversial activities, such as "sending 3 people on a flight to prove RBG is alive" (as if the presumption is she's dead), or claiming to have proven Comey's latest tweets are over a year old by misunderstanding metadata screenshots, or posting videos of violence and framing them in terms of race war fake narrative, NEVER EVER JUST BLINDLY ACCEPT ANY OF IT ON THE BASIS OF MAKING YOU FEEL GOOD.

ALWAYS remain skeptical until you can prove to yourself, thinking for yourself, and researching for yourself, before you accept ANY claims from anons here as FACTS.

I am not here saying blindly REJECT any claim by any anon here either. Only to always rely on your own ability to think and research and make your own assessments of whether or not you're reading a gaslighter/shill trying to trick you with half truths corrupted with falsehoods/lies, or after having researched yourself that you're reading factual statements.

Q3306: 'Context of drops mislabeled and used?' 'Select orgs/journalists dropping controversial info as attempt to label as whole, screenshooting, then writing articles on drops they themselves wrote?'

What is the probability that those who are under the greatest threat from Q, those with the $ and panic-stricken motivation to attack this Q movement, would pretend to be Q anons or MAGA supporters and post misleading/hateful/fake posts not because they want to advance the movement (that threatens their power), but to use their own postings as an "excuse" on other sites to attack it as 'wrong', 'hateful', 'ultra-right wing', or 'anti-semitic', or any other label to DIVIDE the movement?

Did the D's leak classified/fake information to press outlets like Buzzfeed and Yahoo, and then used those very same 'news reports' as justification of their 'accuracy' to dishonestly apply for a FISA on a Presidential candidate now POTUS?

If they would do that to POTUS, what is the probability they would do that with Q related social media sites?

Is there any other way that truth can be separated from fiction than for each of us to take full control over what we each think and know as 'fact' by finding out for ourselves?

Will you take responsibility and never accept any claim on this site as fact until you find out for yourself by logic and evidence?