"All truth passes through three stages: Firstly, it is ridiculed. Secondly, it is violently opposed."Thirdly, it is accepted as being self-evident." ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER
"Sometimes people do not want to hear the truth because they do not want their illusions to be destroyed." FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE
To be no one but yourself in a world that is doing its best to make you everybody else means to fight the hardest battle that any human being can fight and never stop. Does this sound dismal? It isn't, it is the most wonderful life on earth.
For the love of Christ or whatever you believe in, you people still believe in the Q Anon nonsense? You have not seen one shred of evidence or proof that anyone is going after the so called Elites. Although you have seen Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Gates, Pinedo, Alex van der Zwaan, Cohen, and Papadopoulos all go down. What other proof do you freaking need to wake up and realize you are being totally had?
When Trump is impeached and leaving the White House in AF 1 you brainwashed folks will still say “Trust the Plan it is all part of the plan.” At what point will you people accept the fact that the ruling class of Elites hate Trump and they are on the verge of booting him and he has no plan? At what point?
You have witnessed all of Trump's associates scooped up while the Clinton's are attending parties laughing and living it up and out campaigning and giving speeches. Let alone the other freaking bad actors like Podesta, Comey, Yates, Brennan, Clapper, Stzrok, Page, Lynch, Obummer, Steele, Baker and the Ohr's all out and about giving speeches attending conferences, appearing on CNN and MSNBC and not to mention on some of the history channel programs.
They continue to walk free. No mass arrests. No Storm. No this or that the Q continues shoveling out.
You do see what is coming right? Investigations of 81 individuals involved with Trump let alone the investigations by the SDONY looking into the Trump organization for possible fraud and money laundering.
Q is a Psy-Op pure and simple. Admit you have been had man. I cannot believe how delusional you Q-tist's have become. At what point do you really Wake The Hell Up and Take the Red Pill? Q is a DS Psy-Op Larp folks.
Absolutely Zero of any Q predictions have unfolded. ZERO.
Too many people today are looking for reasons to be offended. Including Q followers who will not accept the fact that they are being totally misled by a DARPA CIA-NSA Psy-Op. In which is really a super quantum computer created by IBM and IQT for the CIA/NSA and uses a language called Lulzypher.
We have them under the target.
view the rest of the comments →
17208564? ago
This again? At least add more to your story with evidence so we can even consider to take you seriously...
17208606? ago
You people are suffering from Anosognosia.
ad nauseam
Drop #1 “claimed that “HRC extradition [was] already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run” with Drop #2 alleging “HRC detained, not arrested (yet)” and that there would be “massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=45
Drop #15 to predict that John Podesta would be indicted on Nov. 3, 17 and Clinton aide Huma Abedin indicted on Nov. 6, 17.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=45
Drop #25 that proof of his predictions would “begin 11.3, 18.” Again, the only significant event of this day was the president leaving for Asia. Drop #32, Q claimed that the “initial wave [of arrests] will be fast and meaningful,” with many members of the media “jailed as deep cover agents.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=44
Drop #34 unveiled a host of predictions for what Q claimed would happen imminently. He claimed that “over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country.” He claimed that everything he’d been talking about in secret “will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted,” resulting in “public riots.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=44
Drop #38 continued with the conspiracy fantasizing, predicting “other state actors attempting to harm us during this transition,” along with “increased military movement,” “[National Guard] deployments starting tomorrow, and “false flags.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=44
Drop #44 that “before POTUS departs on Friday he will be sending an important message via Twitter,” used Drop #47 to warn his readers to “be vigilant today and expect a major false flag,” and claimed in Drop #55 that President Trump would unleash the massive military purge (now nicknamed “The Storm”) with a tweet reading “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us…….”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=44
Drop #61: that there would be “Twitter and other social media blackouts” that would accompany the massive deep state purge. Drop #65, Q claimed “it has begun,” with Drop #67 predicting that news of John Podesta’s military plane being “forced down” “will be leaked” with a prominent “fake news anchor” being pulled off the air.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=44
Needless to say, none of what Q predicted in his first 60+ posts took place. The National Guard was never called up, mass arrests never took place, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta weren’t detained, Donald Trump never sent a tweet mentioning “The Storm,” and the Emergency Alert System wasn’t activated.
On Dec. 10, 17 Q predicted in Drop #326 that “false flag(s)” would occur, with “POTUS 100% insulated” and to “expect fireworks.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=40
Drop #647, Q seemed to predict a major event involving the Department of Defense for Feb. 1, 18, calling it the “[D]ay [Of] [D]ays.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=34
A few days after that fizzled, Q insinuated in Drop #700 that the weekend of Feb. 10. 18 and 1 would be a “suicide weekend” for individuals targeted by the president. There were no high-profile suicides by public figures that weekend.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=33
Drop #796 was a post full of quasi-military chatter that seemed to predict a possible car bombing in London around Feb. 18, 18. No terrorist attack of any type happened in London at all that month.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=32
As talk of President Trump’s military parade ramped up, Q predicted in Drop #856 that “a parade that will never be forgotten” would take place on 11/11/18. That parade has now been postponed until next year due to costs, and likely won’t take place at all.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=31
Then, in Drop #912, Q claimed that the intelligence sharing alliance known as “Five Eyes” “won’t be around much longer.” As of August 2018, it is still in effect.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=30
Drop #997 predicted on April 3, 18 that the Pope would “have a terrible May.” The closest to this that happened was the resignation of several Chilean bishops in June after Pope Francis criticized them over their handling of a sex abuse scandal.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=28
On April 7, Q made a cryptic post in Drop #1067 that read simply “China. Chongqing. Tuesday.” The next Tuesday was April 10, 18 and no newsworthy event took place on that day in that city.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=27
Drop #1302 on April 27, 18 Q claimed a “Mother of All Bombs” related to negotiations with North Korea would be “dropped” in the next week. Never happened again.
Q predicted on March 5 in Drop #854 that “HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5)” [sic] would soon emerge, and that it would be the “nail in many coffins.” She went on a tour with William Clinton.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=31
Q predicted in Drop #1043 that “pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire,” and insinuated in two April drops that photos of Obama with a young girl named “Wendy” would appear and open him up to charges of pedophilia. No such pictures have ever appeared.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=28
Q predicted John McCain’s resignation from the Senate as “imminent” several times, including Drop #1319 and Drop #1850, as well as predicting the “end near” in Drop #1555. Only this week did McCain announce he would stop seeking treatment for cancer.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=23 https://qmap.pub/?pg=19 https://qmap.pub/?pg=14
On April 4, 18 Q claimed in Drop #1014 that Mark Zuckerberg was going to step down as chair of Facebook and flee the United States. The same day Q predicted this, Zuckerberg reiterated that he was NOT going to step down—and he still hasn’t.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=28
Q has also made some fizzled predictions about Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, saying “goodbye” to him in Drops #525 and #598, insinuating that Dorsey would be removed from Twitter in Drop #799, predicting in Drop #1102 that Dorsey was “next”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=36 https://qmap.pub/?pg=35 https://qmap.pub/?pg=27
Q’s use of the phrase “next week” to denote the occurrence of something important started with Drop #243 when Q told his followers “just wait until next week” without making any kind of claim as to what was going to happen. It would be the first of over a dozen times Q would kick the can down the road to “next week.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=41
In Drop #464: Q vaguely predicted a “BIG NEXT WEEK” on Jan. 5, 18 doubling down in Drop #527, predicting “Next Week – BIGGER,” repeating the claim three drops later.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=37 https://qmap.pub/?pg=36
Drop #1594 became one of Q’s most famous blown predictions, as he claimed that July would be “the month the world discovered the TRUTH.”
https://qmap.pub/?pg=18
After not posting for about three weeks, Q posted in Drop #1687 that “something BIG is about to drop” with links to various press articles about QAnon. He made the exact same claim in Drops #1708, 1748, and 1802.
https://qmap.pub/?pg=17 https://qmap.pub/?pg=16 https://qmap.pub/?pg=15
QAnon baked a whole loaf of bullshit March 10 2018 alone.
I have 2993 more FAILED Drops if you want them..
17209097? ago
Qanon members should read through this and cut your losses now. All of the following is sourced with objective, verifiable facts.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gitmo expansion before/after Trump:
Qanon circulates a before/after picture claiming that Trump has expanded Gitmo, in preparation for thousands of prisoners. Everything in the after section was in place by 2008, & the prison facilities shown (Camp 5 and 6) can only house around 250 combined.
https://i.imgur.com/MVsr7Fd.jpgJPG
Upgrades are taking place at Gitmo, but they are all support, and most at the large Naval base. No prison cell expansion has occurred under DJT, and none are expected, now that the Dems control the House. Maximum available prisoner housing: ~250
Source
Gitmo prison barges:
There are no prison barges headed to Gitmo. The post that circulated a little while back was a mistake. It contained 2 ships... 1 was a NYC prison permanently parked in NYC, and the other was a Navy barracks ship.
https://i.imgur.com/j8M3lCv.pngPNG
Source
70k Sealed Indictments:
This article examines the numbers in depth, and proves that the claim is false. The Qanon research team is misrepresenting the numbers on the chart, and making false comparisons to incomplete data from 13 years ago. There aren't 70k sealed indictments... that's an irrefutable fact.
The article also examined several high profile states/districts (like all of CA, DC, and CO), and found that when properly compared to recent history, the current sealed activity in the court system does not appear unusual. The article is fully sourced to PACER.
Source
Q stating that the sealed indictment chart was 'good tracking', and claiming that there are 50k+ sealed indictments:
The chartmakers recently changed the title of the chart from 'indictments' to 'cases', because it was untruthful. The person that maintains the spreadsheet of their data now concedes that only around 2k are likely indictments, and there is no proof that amount is unusual.
Q said the chart was 'good tracking' even though it was a misrepresentation of the numbers, and had several glaring mistakes on it (like saying 1077 was average). He also claimed there were 50k+ sealed indictments, when the team now concedes that there are likely less than 2k.
https://i.imgur.com/STlAGMI.pngPNG
https://i.imgur.com/A5s5OiO.pngPNG
Human Trafficking arrests at record levels:
This graphic is circulated which claims that Trump has overseen a dramatic increase in human trafficking arrests:
https://i.imgur.com/s1HvCNz.pngPNG
The numbers are a false comparison. All of the Obama year numbers are from the yearly ICE Human Trafficking report, while the Trump number is supposedly a compilation of news articles, global numbers, and additional categories. Good luck finding the true source for the Trump number.
It's mostly irrelevant, because we know the Obama numbers are all from the ICE report, and we now have the 2017 ICE report that we can use for a true apples/apples comparison. It reported 1602 arrests for Trump in 2017, which was less than Obama achieved in 2016, and was also less than 3 of the 4 previous years under Obama. The 2018 report has not been released yet.
https://i.imgur.com/g90UvWh.png
This is the corrected graphic:
https://i.imgur.com/YDyMRlo.pngPNG
DOJ statistics show no significant increase in sex offense prosecutions under DJT... many categories were higher under Obama.
https://i.imgur.com/njCZJOX.png
Source
Additionally, this bill was passed while Obama was in office (2015). It establishes a fund to be used to help combat Human Trafficking, during the period FY2016-FY2019. In other words, the bill passed during Obamas tenure enhances the ability of Trump to arrest traffickers presently.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/178
This excerpt explains when/how the funds are to be used:
https://i.imgur.com/wi1MMlE.pngPNG
Downtown L.A. military drill/raid:
Several military helicopters were filmed in downtown L.A. landing in the streets, and moving between buildings. Many posts have been made claiming that this was a secret military raid carried out in downtown LA. The 'proof' is tons of comments from ex-military and armchair military, claiming that an exercise like this would never be carried out in a downtown civilian area. They say the threat to civilians/property is too high, and that these drills would only be performed in mock urban areas that the military has constructed.
That is completely false, as there are dozens of articles and videos that show similar drills taking place: Blackhawk landing next to a parking garage, with people on the roof watching it.
Helicopters in downtown area... explosion heard @ 2:47.
Multiple blackhawks flying in downtown Miami.
In regards to the broken windows in L.A. (on a vacant building about to be torn down), damage to civilian property is not unheard of. During an exercise in Flint MI, a helicopter landing on the roof of a civilian building caused the front of it to partially collapse.
Source
Some claim that they wore hazmat suits, and sprayed down the helicopter, which wouldn't be done for a drill. Again, incorrect. Ask anyone that's been in the military if they donned things like chemical gear when practicing certain scenarios. They do. People walk around in full chem gear and gas masks all the time, along with going through decontamination stations, when a base is having a drill. If they were going to conduct an exercise concerning biohazard, they would wear the outfits and go through the motions.
Mass resignations:
There is an informal list of ~7k resignations being maintained, and the narrative is that that amount is unprecedented. This is a false claim, as there is no historical data available to compare that number to. There is no way to know if this amount is high, low, or normal.
The only historical data that exists in regards to resignations, is from this company that tracks US CEO resignations. It shows that 2018 resignations were only 8% higher than in 2014... so not a dramatic increase.
If you compare the total resignations from 2017 and 2018 to the total from 2013 and 2014, it's only a 1% increase.
Source
2012 Mass arrest blog:
The promise of mass arrests of the cabal has been making the rounds for a while.
Here is a blog post from 2012, where they claim that mass arrests are imminent. They discuss military involvement, EAS messages, and cite recent mass resignations at the time, as proof something was about to happen... they even called it "the Plan".
In the comments you can read people complaining that the promised arrests never happened, and that they were going back to reality. Again... from 2012.
The person that wrote this (David Wilcock) is pushing the Q story heavily, along with the false 70k sealed indictments claim. He is one of the biggest names in the disclosure community, and he makes money by promoting the mass arrest fantasy... both in 2012, and in 2019. Jordan Sather works closely with him.
Source
Huber and the 470 attorneys:
Huber was not assigned 470 attorneys. When Sessions mentioned this number, he was making a general observation about the ENTIRE STAFF of the DOJ OIG nationwide (lawyers, secretaries, clerks, etc.). Only at the end of the letter did he bring up Huber's assignment.
Source
Who started the 70k sealed indictment claim:
This article shows the exact person that started the Qanon 70k sealed indictment claim, and the mistakes they made in doing so. It shows how the claim went from 2 documents, to 12, 33, 50, 141... etc. up to the current wildly inaccurate 70k claim. It also shows how the current research team was started, and the mistakes/deception they engaged in, while creating the chart.
Source
Whidbey Island 'missile':
This article examines this incident thoroughly, and almost unquestionably proves that the image was the light trails left behind by the navigation lights on a helicopter passing overhead, during a 20 second long exposure. It includes live radar footage and crew reports, that confirm a helicopter passed over that location, at that time.
Source
17209507? ago
Gotta give it to your supervisor.
It's quite easy to keep up if you follow the DOJ press releases, watch the pressers and hearings, etc. Obama was releasing UACs to anyone and not keeping track, when this supply was cut off traitors went crazy and many members of congress, instead of doing their job to create legislation to fix the problem permanently, actually went to the border to protest the results of them not doing their jobs.
These long posts confirm Q for me, I don't care at all who Q is or whatever, it's still the most reliable information provided if you want to understand what's going on and how we got here.
17209683? ago
Verifiable objective facts that disprove some of the biggest claims related to Q, confirm Q? That's backwards logic.
There are thousands of DOJ press releases from the Obama years that reported the same types of prosecutions. Browsing articles is not a legitimate way to compare data. Using the stats that the DOJ and ICE are reporting, Trump is doing no more than Obama in regards to sex trafficking prosecutions... in many categories he is doing worse than Obama.
Keep chasing the can that the 4chan fortune teller ghost keeps kicking down the road, if you want... makes me no difference. I'm posting this information to show rational people that nearly all of the claims being made are hogwash.
17209810? ago
Then who built the Denver airport?
We seem to have different goals. I want true information so I can make informed decisions. You want what? Arrests? A military psy-op to give YOU the truth and not smoke out the traitors and seditious conspirators? What is your end game? Why are you willing to take so much time if not for a paycheck?
17209955? ago
I love how people seem shocked that others would do research, and not just read a meme and consider it the truth. Q literally tells people to not trust anyone and do your own research, but when I provide my research people say I'm crazy for doing it. You guys are so backwards with your logic.
I just gave you the real truth about some of the biggest claims in this movement, and your response was to accuse me of being a shill, and question why I would spend time doing research.
You dont want the truth, you want your fantasy to be legitimized.
17209971? ago
I didn't accuse you of being a shill, I asked you a bunch of questions that you didn't answer.
17210070? ago
Playing semantic word games now? Those statements imply that you think I'm a shill. Dont play dumb.
Again... I provided the 'real' truth, that corrected several pieces of misinformation, and your response was to question my motives. My motive is correcting the false information being spewed all over the internet.
The fact that you would question someone's motives for providing the truth, shows how spellbound you are.
17210188? ago
Sorry you're not an autist and your breakdown doesn't reek of brilliance to us. Seems like this is all about your ego, that you're posting with an agenda and pissed off that no one on a Q sub finds your anti-Q rant (if you wrote it yourself) convincing enough to take the black pill of nihilism you're pushing so hard.
You didn't answer my questions:
Why are you willing to take so much time if not for a paycheck? (keeping in mind that each of us is responsible to discern truth for ourselves, why are you so upset that no one (but your buddies or other profiles) on a Q sub gives a shit what you have to say?
If you were respectful about it, we'd be nicer to you but we still wouldn't buy what you're peddling which is nihilism.
17210669? ago
Ad-hominem attacks and shifting the argument. The calling card of the Q 'truth seekers'.
I told you what my end game is: correcting misinfo spread around the internet.
Apparently you think that isn't a good enough reason.
17210748? ago
You've corrected the "misinformation" but surely you know who built the Denver airport since the article linked in the most recent (bullshit of course) Q drop states that no one knows for sure and surely you know the ultimate truth, right?
Why the ad hominem attacks just because no one's interested in what you're peddling because this is a military psy-op and you need to be an autist to understand all the comms?
A better strategy would be to follow the autists and try to discredit their information. Good luck.
17210806? ago
Wow, you are stuck on the Denver airport thing huh? Anything to avoid discussing the mountain of evidence I just presented, I guess.
I haven't researched the Denver airport, so there is no point in me weighing in on it. I'll take whatever your stance is on it as plausible for now, until if/when I decide to research it.
Blah blah blah.
People like you are the enemy of truth. Ridicule others for doing research, even if their research is accurate.
17210883? ago
Just ridiculing you for making false assumptions and constantly projecting. The reason no one bothers with your so-called research is because you clearly have an agenda.
I stated from the beginning that it's a military psy-op. Psy ops are not intended to provide 100% accurate information. Some of us are cool with that, esp. when brilliant autists break things down with such precision months or years before the same information is verified.
You seem to be threatened by people trusting their own inner bullshit detectors in an age of ubiquitous gas lighting where your information is taken with a grain of salt, just like everything else.
17210984? ago
You called me a shill and questioned my motives with your very first post. Lol. I'm respectful until someone acts like a jerk... after that, if you dish it, you get it.
Facts are facts, jack. If they dont tell you what you want to hear, it aint my problem.
17211019? ago
Your initial post is disrespectful, and your links are a joke.
17211856? ago
Because I said 'cut your losses'? Lol. Snowflake.
As far as my links: 'nuh uh' is not a rebuttal. Everything is accurate, and it disproves some of the biggest claims. Happy to discuss the facts with you. :)
17212169? ago
The links you provided come from unverified sources parroting your narrative, in an age of ubiquitous gas lighting people have to be allowed to discern for themselves. Progressive shills can't help but pepper their posts with sugarcoated attacks and then they freak out when everyone points out the obvious.
You're not responsible for me or my soul. Worry about yourself.
17212768? ago
Again... 'nuh uh' is not a rebuttal. Point out something that is an unverified source. Every fact is legitimately sourced, and it's accurate.
If you can't point them out, then you have no argument.
17212805? ago
Still waiting for the raw data re: 2009-2016 vs. 2017-now human trafficking arrests. Post that up to demonstrate that you wrote these walls of text yourself and maybe we'll have a discussion about facts.
Anything else is just projecting your own tactics. You're the one whose argument is in question, I'm not a q-tard, I'm here to watch the psy-op unfold.
17213579? ago
It's literally the news releases from ICE. It's not a reporter writing an opinion piece, it's the agency disclosing their numbers.
For the DOJ statistics that I provided, 2014-2019 that show no significant increase in sexual offense prosecutions, this is the report they came from.
https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/data_tables/jb_d2_0930.2018.pdf
17214265? ago
You said earlier that the news releases from the DOJ aren't sufficient. Play by your own rules and provide the raw data for both so we can compare real numbers.
17214470? ago
No I didn't. I said the Trump number was a compilation of news articles, global numbers, and different categories, of which there is literally no source. How can you compare numbers if the methods are different?
An agency releasing their numbers in a press release, is not the same thing as some knucklehead with a news feed counting google articles. It's hard data that can be compared apples:apples.
17214703? ago
You're so fucking disrespectful, too distracted beating on your straw man and living by a double standard to discuss anything of substance.
I told you up front I subscribe to the DOJ releases where this data is disseminated in the same way as ICE on a regular basis. Now we're back at the beginning because you were too invested in telling me I'm stupid to discuss the actual issues and proved my point that it's valid information by relying on the exact same dissemination method yourself.
Clearly a person who doesn't know what it doesn't know.
17215185? ago
First of all, there has been some confusion that I just figured out. I am not the OP, or the guy that made all the Q drops. That guy was rude in his presentation. My first post was the one with the links/research. I forgot about the anonymous thing on this board, and forgot to say that I was a different person.
DOJ press releases cant be used for comparison, unless you use all the DOJ press releases under Obama. Otherwise, it's a false comparison. Intermittent press releases like that are a poor way to keep track, anyway.
I provided the official DOJ stats... why reject those? That's far more accurate than the intermittent DOJ press releases, and we can make an apples:apples comparison to the Obama years.
As far as ICE, those are press releases by the agency, that include their yearly numbers... that's how they disclose them. It's an apples:apples comparison to Trump.
Want to throw out the ICE reports for some reason? Ok. Then we are left with the DOJ statistics, which dont show a notable increase in sex offense prosecutions under Trump.
Same thing, no matter what apples:apples comparison you use... there is no evidence that Trump is doing significantly more than Obama.
17223244? ago
LOL, ok dude.
Without that line I might have bought the spin that you're sane and didn't copy and paste your supposed research.
17232226? ago
That makes no sense. I provided sourced evidence that shows no significant uptick in human trafficking or sex offense prosecutions. Many categories show Trump doing worse than Obama, as with the ICE yearly report.
If you have evidence to show otherwise, post it.
17233078? ago
Go post your bullshit on GA so we know which of you rude regurgitators we're talking to.
17234271? ago
Who cares who is posting it? I could be Barack Obama and it wouldn't change the legitimacy of the research I provided... it's either accurate, or it isn't.
17235493? ago
You're not the only one posting, someone was trying to pretend he isn't a rude condescending asshole here to sow division yesterday when it was very hard to tell the difference in tone and post.
17239291? ago
There was confusion due to the anonymous poster thing. You are probably talking about me, but like I said it was a mix-up. Point remains that it doesn't matter who it is, the data is either legit or it isn't.
17243164? ago
I studied statistics and law. Watched them both skewed to legitimize corruption, fraud and racial tensions.
Go peddle that "you're stupid because I'm good at copy/paste and, since the OP didn't post anything that couldn't easily be refuted and I refuse to post non-anon on GA or even link to my original post, everyone else here is really stupid. Even though I can't post enough quality content to get the CCP necessary to post" bullshit somewhere else.
The restrictions exist for a good reason.
17246830? ago
Yeah it's because people downvote things that dont support their narrative, even if it is accurate. People like you, who cant form a valid argument to save their lives. All you can do is ramble aimlessly about nothing.
I gave you the requested raw data like 10 posts back, and all you can do is ramble.
That's how I know my research is valid... no one can refute it. Prove me wrong. Or dont, and waste more time regurgitating your ad-hominem garbage.
17261347? ago
There are many non-Q related non-anon subs where all you have to do is post quality content. Very easy to get enough CCP to post and downvoat within 24-48 hours if you're not a copy-paste regurgitator and have the ability to post quality content.
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17260924
17264716? ago
I do post quality content. It gets downvoted by Qanon because they dont like facts that go against their narrative.
I couldn't care less what my CCP is. The research is the same whether it is posted here, or on another board.
17266605? ago
There are a handful of Qsubs and 1000s of non-Q subs. Try again.
17266638? ago
What's your point? Why are you so obsessed with me posting on another board? If you can't refute it here, you can't refute it anywhere else.
17267510? ago
You're interacting with various people, just easier to keep track that way. And see what other bullshit you're posting where you can't even get enough CCP to post after many days. You're the one who keeps replying like it's your job to have the last word in the thread.
The projections and inability to walk away leaving anyone still trusting themselves, rather than your copy-paste wall of text that you couldn't defend to the autists, are still entertaining.
17268988? ago
LOL. Another hypocrite that chastises someone for replying, as he continues to hit the reply button and type garbage. You are free to walk away at any time, chief.
100 garbage posts, and not a single one that was able to find fault in the research. That's a sign of solid work. Thanks everyone!
17269020? ago
No no thank you oh great copy and paste fag, for bestowing your wisdom upon us lowly Qtards, and esp. for doing it anon in a thread because you can't post enough quality content across all of voat to create a post yourself.
17269453? ago
How many times are you going to repeat that meaningless garbage? On the spectrum? I think repetition like this is a sign.
17269559? ago
^^Think Mirror ^^
Just giving you the opportunity to prove you don't have a mental illness that prevents you from leaving the conversation while the other guy still trusts himself. And that you're not paid to have the last post in each thread.
Everything you believe you're making fun of . . .
17270132? ago
LOL. You even steal my mental illness reference. There's no way you are older than 14. Keep trying to get the last word, hypocrite.
17270578? ago
LOL, your most precise projection yet!
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17209345
17272380? ago
That's not me, idiot.
17280118? ago
OP made the mh reference days before you did. No way to prove it is or isn't you, same tone in posts.
17284540? ago
There isn't any cursing in my posts, nor homophobic slurs.
We've exchanged probably 50 posts, and you only made a mh reference immediately after I did for the first time. Lame, and insecure.
17284845? ago
LOL, ok whatever you say oh wise sage without enough CCP (after how many days?) to make its own post.
17285083? ago
Yeah because CCP is so important, lolol.
Learn to think for yourself, then you can have an intelligent conversation about the research, instead of hoping that others will read it and tell you if it is legit.
17288107? ago
CCP indicates you have something - anything - of value to share other than copy paste bullshit but ok. Have another cuppa on me.
17288244? ago
How many times do I have to say that the majority of Qanon downvotes facts that dont support their narrative? Meaning the CCP goes down.
Here's a crazy idea... learn to think for yourself, then you will be able to discern between good/bad research, and wont have to ask people to post it where others can tell you if it's good/bad.
17288309? ago
How many times do I have to say that there are a handful of Q subs and 1000s of NON-Q subs where you can post your high quality content.
Most voaters hate Qtards and love to bitch about them, so that's a lame excuse at best.
17289778? ago
You're assuming I give a rats behind about getting the CCP up. I dont care. I post the info in the comments and am happy to discuss the data with anyone that wants to have a conversation about it... which is no one in this thread.
17290935? ago
In other words
17291429? ago
You got issues man. I told you 50 posts ago that I didnt care about CCP, and that the reason it's low is because Qanon downvotes facts that go against the narrative. And yet, here we are with you continuing to harp on CCP. I can't explain it any more than that.
Not my fault if you dont have the intelligence to think for yourself, and debate the research.
17291448? ago
And I told you no one cares, we keep giving you the oppty to prove you're not a bot or paid to get the last word in a thread. You refuse to take it.
17296123? ago
Me: Hey here is some research, glad to discuss the details with anyone. Welcome critique.
You: HURRRR CCP. POST ON ANOTHER BOARD SO PEOPLE CAN TELL ME IF ITS GOOD. HUURRRR CCCP.
x50
17305099? ago
https://voat.co/v/QRV/3090071
17307613? ago
If you are going to claim that Trump is doing more, you need to compare data, not say things like 'HH recorded people and it will come to light'. The official human trafficking/sex offense numbers show no increase.