You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

17208564? ago

This again? At least add more to your story with evidence so we can even consider to take you seriously...

17208606? ago

You people are suffering from Anosognosia.

ad nauseam

Drop #1 “claimed that “HRC extradition [was] already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run” with Drop #2 alleging “HRC detained, not arrested (yet)” and that there would be “massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=45

Drop #15 to predict that John Podesta would be indicted on Nov. 3, 17 and Clinton aide Huma Abedin indicted on Nov. 6, 17.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=45

Drop #25 that proof of his predictions would “begin 11.3, 18.” Again, the only significant event of this day was the president leaving for Asia. Drop #32, Q claimed that the “initial wave [of arrests] will be fast and meaningful,” with many members of the media “jailed as deep cover agents.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=44

Drop #34 unveiled a host of predictions for what Q claimed would happen imminently. He claimed that “over the course of the next several days you will undoubtedly realize that we are taking back our great country.” He claimed that everything he’d been talking about in secret “will then be revealed and will not be openly accepted,” resulting in “public riots.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=44

Drop #38 continued with the conspiracy fantasizing, predicting “other state actors attempting to harm us during this transition,” along with “increased military movement,” “[National Guard] deployments starting tomorrow, and “false flags.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=44

Drop #44 that “before POTUS departs on Friday he will be sending an important message via Twitter,” used Drop #47 to warn his readers to “be vigilant today and expect a major false flag,” and claimed in Drop #55 that President Trump would unleash the massive military purge (now nicknamed “The Storm”) with a tweet reading “My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us…….”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=44

Drop #61: that there would be “Twitter and other social media blackouts” that would accompany the massive deep state purge. Drop #65, Q claimed “it has begun,” with Drop #67 predicting that news of John Podesta’s military plane being “forced down” “will be leaked” with a prominent “fake news anchor” being pulled off the air.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=44

Needless to say, none of what Q predicted in his first 60+ posts took place. The National Guard was never called up, mass arrests never took place, Hillary Clinton and John Podesta weren’t detained, Donald Trump never sent a tweet mentioning “The Storm,” and the Emergency Alert System wasn’t activated.

On Dec. 10, 17 Q predicted in Drop #326 that “false flag(s)” would occur, with “POTUS 100% insulated” and to “expect fireworks.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=40

Drop #647, Q seemed to predict a major event involving the Department of Defense for Feb. 1, 18, calling it the “[D]ay [Of] [D]ays.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=34

A few days after that fizzled, Q insinuated in Drop #700 that the weekend of Feb. 10. 18 and 1 would be a “suicide weekend” for individuals targeted by the president. There were no high-profile suicides by public figures that weekend.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=33

Drop #796 was a post full of quasi-military chatter that seemed to predict a possible car bombing in London around Feb. 18, 18. No terrorist attack of any type happened in London at all that month.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=32

As talk of President Trump’s military parade ramped up, Q predicted in Drop #856 that “a parade that will never be forgotten” would take place on 11/11/18. That parade has now been postponed until next year due to costs, and likely won’t take place at all.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=31

Then, in Drop #912, Q claimed that the intelligence sharing alliance known as “Five Eyes” “won’t be around much longer.” As of August 2018, it is still in effect.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=30

Drop #997 predicted on April 3, 18 that the Pope would “have a terrible May.” The closest to this that happened was the resignation of several Chilean bishops in June after Pope Francis criticized them over their handling of a sex abuse scandal.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=28

On April 7, Q made a cryptic post in Drop #1067 that read simply “China. Chongqing. Tuesday.” The next Tuesday was April 10, 18 and no newsworthy event took place on that day in that city.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=27

Drop #1302 on April 27, 18 Q claimed a “Mother of All Bombs” related to negotiations with North Korea would be “dropped” in the next week. Never happened again.

Q predicted on March 5 in Drop #854 that “HRC +++ + +++++(raw vid 5:5)” [sic] would soon emerge, and that it would be the “nail in many coffins.” She went on a tour with William Clinton.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=31

Q predicted in Drop #1043 that “pics will surface of Hussein holding AK47 in tribal attire,” and insinuated in two April drops that photos of Obama with a young girl named “Wendy” would appear and open him up to charges of pedophilia. No such pictures have ever appeared.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=28

Q predicted John McCain’s resignation from the Senate as “imminent” several times, including Drop #1319 and Drop #1850, as well as predicting the “end near” in Drop #1555. Only this week did McCain announce he would stop seeking treatment for cancer.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=23 https://qmap.pub/?pg=19 https://qmap.pub/?pg=14

On April 4, 18 Q claimed in Drop #1014 that Mark Zuckerberg was going to step down as chair of Facebook and flee the United States. The same day Q predicted this, Zuckerberg reiterated that he was NOT going to step down—and he still hasn’t.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=28

Q has also made some fizzled predictions about Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, saying “goodbye” to him in Drops #525 and #598, insinuating that Dorsey would be removed from Twitter in Drop #799, predicting in Drop #1102 that Dorsey was “next”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=36 https://qmap.pub/?pg=35 https://qmap.pub/?pg=27

Q’s use of the phrase “next week” to denote the occurrence of something important started with Drop #243 when Q told his followers “just wait until next week” without making any kind of claim as to what was going to happen. It would be the first of over a dozen times Q would kick the can down the road to “next week.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=41

In Drop #464: Q vaguely predicted a “BIG NEXT WEEK” on Jan. 5, 18 doubling down in Drop #527, predicting “Next Week – BIGGER,” repeating the claim three drops later.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=37 https://qmap.pub/?pg=36

Drop #1594 became one of Q’s most famous blown predictions, as he claimed that July would be “the month the world discovered the TRUTH.”

https://qmap.pub/?pg=18

After not posting for about three weeks, Q posted in Drop #1687 that “something BIG is about to drop” with links to various press articles about QAnon. He made the exact same claim in Drops #1708, 1748, and 1802.

https://qmap.pub/?pg=17 https://qmap.pub/?pg=16 https://qmap.pub/?pg=15

QAnon baked a whole loaf of bullshit March 10 2018 alone.

I have 2993 more FAILED Drops if you want them..

17209097? ago

Qanon members should read through this and cut your losses now. All of the following is sourced with objective, verifiable facts.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Gitmo expansion before/after Trump:

Qanon circulates a before/after picture claiming that Trump has expanded Gitmo, in preparation for thousands of prisoners. Everything in the after section was in place by 2008, & the prison facilities shown (Camp 5 and 6) can only house around 250 combined.

https://i.imgur.com/MVsr7Fd.jpgJPG

Upgrades are taking place at Gitmo, but they are all support, and most at the large Naval base. No prison cell expansion has occurred under DJT, and none are expected, now that the Dems control the House. Maximum available prisoner housing: ~250

Source

Gitmo prison barges:

There are no prison barges headed to Gitmo. The post that circulated a little while back was a mistake. It contained 2 ships... 1 was a NYC prison permanently parked in NYC, and the other was a Navy barracks ship.

https://i.imgur.com/j8M3lCv.pngPNG

Source

70k Sealed Indictments:

This article examines the numbers in depth, and proves that the claim is false. The Qanon research team is misrepresenting the numbers on the chart, and making false comparisons to incomplete data from 13 years ago. There aren't 70k sealed indictments... that's an irrefutable fact.

The article also examined several high profile states/districts (like all of CA, DC, and CO), and found that when properly compared to recent history, the current sealed activity in the court system does not appear unusual. The article is fully sourced to PACER.

Source

Q stating that the sealed indictment chart was 'good tracking', and claiming that there are 50k+ sealed indictments:

The chartmakers recently changed the title of the chart from 'indictments' to 'cases', because it was untruthful. The person that maintains the spreadsheet of their data now concedes that only around 2k are likely indictments, and there is no proof that amount is unusual.

Q said the chart was 'good tracking' even though it was a misrepresentation of the numbers, and had several glaring mistakes on it (like saying 1077 was average). He also claimed there were 50k+ sealed indictments, when the team now concedes that there are likely less than 2k.

https://i.imgur.com/STlAGMI.pngPNG

https://i.imgur.com/A5s5OiO.pngPNG

Human Trafficking arrests at record levels:

This graphic is circulated which claims that Trump has overseen a dramatic increase in human trafficking arrests:

https://i.imgur.com/s1HvCNz.pngPNG

The numbers are a false comparison. All of the Obama year numbers are from the yearly ICE Human Trafficking report, while the Trump number is supposedly a compilation of news articles, global numbers, and additional categories. Good luck finding the true source for the Trump number.

It's mostly irrelevant, because we know the Obama numbers are all from the ICE report, and we now have the 2017 ICE report that we can use for a true apples/apples comparison. It reported 1602 arrests for Trump in 2017, which was less than Obama achieved in 2016, and was also less than 3 of the 4 previous years under Obama. The 2018 report has not been released yet.

https://i.imgur.com/g90UvWh.png

This is the corrected graphic:

https://i.imgur.com/YDyMRlo.pngPNG

DOJ statistics show no significant increase in sex offense prosecutions under DJT... many categories were higher under Obama.

https://i.imgur.com/njCZJOX.png

Source

Additionally, this bill was passed while Obama was in office (2015). It establishes a fund to be used to help combat Human Trafficking, during the period FY2016-FY2019. In other words, the bill passed during Obamas tenure enhances the ability of Trump to arrest traffickers presently.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/178

This excerpt explains when/how the funds are to be used:

https://i.imgur.com/wi1MMlE.pngPNG

Downtown L.A. military drill/raid:

Several military helicopters were filmed in downtown L.A. landing in the streets, and moving between buildings. Many posts have been made claiming that this was a secret military raid carried out in downtown LA. The 'proof' is tons of comments from ex-military and armchair military, claiming that an exercise like this would never be carried out in a downtown civilian area. They say the threat to civilians/property is too high, and that these drills would only be performed in mock urban areas that the military has constructed.

That is completely false, as there are dozens of articles and videos that show similar drills taking place: Blackhawk landing next to a parking garage, with people on the roof watching it.

Helicopters in downtown area... explosion heard @ 2:47.

Multiple blackhawks flying in downtown Miami.

In regards to the broken windows in L.A. (on a vacant building about to be torn down), damage to civilian property is not unheard of. During an exercise in Flint MI, a helicopter landing on the roof of a civilian building caused the front of it to partially collapse.

Source

Some claim that they wore hazmat suits, and sprayed down the helicopter, which wouldn't be done for a drill. Again, incorrect. Ask anyone that's been in the military if they donned things like chemical gear when practicing certain scenarios. They do. People walk around in full chem gear and gas masks all the time, along with going through decontamination stations, when a base is having a drill. If they were going to conduct an exercise concerning biohazard, they would wear the outfits and go through the motions.

Mass resignations:

There is an informal list of ~7k resignations being maintained, and the narrative is that that amount is unprecedented. This is a false claim, as there is no historical data available to compare that number to. There is no way to know if this amount is high, low, or normal.

The only historical data that exists in regards to resignations, is from this company that tracks US CEO resignations. It shows that 2018 resignations were only 8% higher than in 2014... so not a dramatic increase.

If you compare the total resignations from 2017 and 2018 to the total from 2013 and 2014, it's only a 1% increase.

Source

2012 Mass arrest blog:

The promise of mass arrests of the cabal has been making the rounds for a while.

Here is a blog post from 2012, where they claim that mass arrests are imminent. They discuss military involvement, EAS messages, and cite recent mass resignations at the time, as proof something was about to happen... they even called it "the Plan".

In the comments you can read people complaining that the promised arrests never happened, and that they were going back to reality. Again... from 2012.

The person that wrote this (David Wilcock) is pushing the Q story heavily, along with the false 70k sealed indictments claim. He is one of the biggest names in the disclosure community, and he makes money by promoting the mass arrest fantasy... both in 2012, and in 2019. Jordan Sather works closely with him.

Source

Huber and the 470 attorneys:

Huber was not assigned 470 attorneys. When Sessions mentioned this number, he was making a general observation about the ENTIRE STAFF of the DOJ OIG nationwide (lawyers, secretaries, clerks, etc.). Only at the end of the letter did he bring up Huber's assignment.

Source

Who started the 70k sealed indictment claim:

This article shows the exact person that started the Qanon 70k sealed indictment claim, and the mistakes they made in doing so. It shows how the claim went from 2 documents, to 12, 33, 50, 141... etc. up to the current wildly inaccurate 70k claim. It also shows how the current research team was started, and the mistakes/deception they engaged in, while creating the chart.

Source

Whidbey Island 'missile':

This article examines this incident thoroughly, and almost unquestionably proves that the image was the light trails left behind by the navigation lights on a helicopter passing overhead, during a 20 second long exposure. It includes live radar footage and crew reports, that confirm a helicopter passed over that location, at that time.

Source

17347068? ago

Sealed indictments slowly being unsealed, big names this week are just the tip of the iceberg. This will all be proven untrue by September. In the meantime, pat yourself on the back for copy-pasting someone's published article without reference.

17357302? ago

Sealed indictments are always being unsealed. What's the significance of September, or are you just predicting everything will have come to light by then?

What is the published article you are talking about? I wrote all the articles that I linked, except for the Wilcock one. Unless I'm forgetting something.

17325831? ago

Good work.

17330061? ago

How many accounts do you have to keep talking to yourself this way?

17342300? ago

One.

17261652? ago

Given the spin on the missile that was photographed, do your handlers have something for you to copy and paste refuting the possibility of hacking cars and taking control from the driver too?

17264939? ago

It isn't spin, it's facts and evidence. Glad to discuss any of the facts with you.

17260924? ago

Are you saying that Huber hasn’t been working behind the scenes on prosecutions without leaks and that the DOJ OIG only has 470 employees?

Your Whidbey Island explanation is a huge stretch, exp. looking at the Avenatti and Brennan Twatter posts while AF1 was leaving Canada for Singapore.

What does someone else’s 2012 blog have to do with anything, other than associating a military psy op with nut bags?

If there isn’t an uptick in high level resignations and this is all normal, why did freshman congressman Jeff Flake announce so early into his only term that he wasn’t running for re-election? Why did the Speaker of the House also step down and decide not to run again if he wasn’t involved with the dossier and ongoing coup attempt?

Why did Eric Schmidt resign after President Trunp signed the same previously unenforceable EO re: human traffickers?

Are you stating here, publicly, that there will be no mass arrests? If so, can you post this “research” on GA so we can revisit end of April to finish the discussion?

I read the entire thread and came back to cock every “source” you provided. It’s not irrefutable or well researched, it’s just regurgitating the same cya MSM narratives used on all the easily herded sheep who’ve been convinced they’re really the wolves.

If you’re really serious, please post this same comment on a GA thread so we can revisit it all in 6 weeks and finish the discussion.

No sense wasting time speculating when Q drops indicate thingsare happening, meaning we’ll know soon enough if it’s all a lark or a true military operation the likes of which we’ve never seen.

17330079? ago

Kek, tip of the iceberg re: unsealed indictments, let them keep posting their "unassailable" copy paste bullshit. It will be comedy gold within weeks.

17330480? ago

Maybe we SHOULD keep the thread alive!

17264884? ago

and that the DOJ OIG only has 470 employees?

I'm not saying that the DOJ OIG only has 470 employees, they are. Sessions literally said that in the letter I posted. Here is the FY2018 budget request, and it lists 470 positions.

https://www.justice.gov/jmd/page/file/968336/download

Your Whidbey Island explanation is a huge stretch,

"Nuh uh" is not a rebuttal. Evidence overwhelmingly points to a helicopter.

What does someone else’s 2012 blog have to do with anything

I made it pretty clear. It's pointing out that this specific story is nothing new, and it is being pushed by someone who makes a living off of wild unsourced claims.

If there isn’t an uptick in high level resignations and this is all normal, why did freshman congressman Jeff Flake...

The only point I made was that there is no proof that resignations are at an all time high.

It’s not irrefutable or well researched,

And yet, you've been unable to do so. Everything is sourced.

please post copy paste the same comment on a GA thread

It's been posted on GA before. Make a thread and I will post in it.

17217363? ago

You claim there’s no historical data to compare the resignations to verify they’re higher than normal but that’s disingenuous because when in the history of the congress have freshmen senators and even the Speaker of the House stepped down of their own volition rather than run for another term?

17218059? ago

It's not disingenuous if there isn't historical data to compare the 7k list to... which there isn't. The only category I found was US CEO's and it does not show a dramatic uptick. If you have numbers for a different category, I'll take a look at them.

17210232? ago

Good research and organization. It's hard to argue with facts...so people don't when they can't. Instead you get irrelevant and unresponsive retorts...as are exhibited here.

17209870? ago

All that for a larp? You need a break from the internet

17209986? ago

Typical Qanon member response. Hurrrr you mean you researched this stuff? Hurrrr what's wrong with you.... hurrr trust muh plan.

17209507? ago

Gotta give it to your supervisor.

Good luck finding the true source for the Trump number.

It's quite easy to keep up if you follow the DOJ press releases, watch the pressers and hearings, etc. Obama was releasing UACs to anyone and not keeping track, when this supply was cut off traitors went crazy and many members of congress, instead of doing their job to create legislation to fix the problem permanently, actually went to the border to protest the results of them not doing their jobs.

These long posts confirm Q for me, I don't care at all who Q is or whatever, it's still the most reliable information provided if you want to understand what's going on and how we got here.

17209683? ago

These long posts confirm Q for me, I don't care at all who Q is or whatever, it's still the most reliable information provided if you want to understand what's going on and how we got here.

Verifiable objective facts that disprove some of the biggest claims related to Q, confirm Q? That's backwards logic.

It's quite easy to keep up if you follow the DOJ press releases, watch the pressers and hearings, etc

There are thousands of DOJ press releases from the Obama years that reported the same types of prosecutions. Browsing articles is not a legitimate way to compare data. Using the stats that the DOJ and ICE are reporting, Trump is doing no more than Obama in regards to sex trafficking prosecutions... in many categories he is doing worse than Obama.

Keep chasing the can that the 4chan fortune teller ghost keeps kicking down the road, if you want... makes me no difference. I'm posting this information to show rational people that nearly all of the claims being made are hogwash.

17210683? ago

There are thousands of DOJ press releases from the Obama years that reported the same types of prosecutions. Browsing articles is not a legitimate way to compare data. Using the stats that the DOJ and ICE are reporting, Trump is doing no more than Obama in regards to sex trafficking prosecutions... in many categories he is doing worse than Obama.

Actually, you can subscribe and get a list of everything that happened with the DOJ the previous day, very easy to create your own database, esp. for those who've subscribed from the beginning of the administration. No denying UAC were abused by the previous administration and often released to traffickers with no follow-up, and then Dems flipped out when the supply of kids was cut off.

You seem to have an agenda and it's not to tell the objective truth.

17210747? ago

You seem to have an agenda and it's not to tell the objective truth.

My agenda is correcting misinfo spread around the internet.

Point out something I said that isn't truthful/accurate.

Actually, you can subscribe and get a list of everything that happened with the DOJ the previous day,

I said that there are 1000's of DOJ press releases you can look up on their website. You can also google old articles.

My point was that browsing articles is not a legitimate/scientific way to compare data. The statistics from ICE and DOJ are apples:apples.

17210837? ago

In other words, reality is not real but statistics are? Next you're going to say black mob violence isn't real because the statistics just don't support it.

Thank you so much. You've changed my mind.

17210929? ago

That makes no sense. Reality is real, and statistics are real.

17211060? ago

So desperate to control the narrative!

Why were statistics for crimes committed BY Whites fudged to include Hispanics and mixed race while statistics for crimes committed AGAINST Whites do not include Hispanics and mixed race?

17211118? ago

Lol shift that argument. You've been trained well.

I never said anything that disagreed with what you just said, did I?

Shift dat argument!

17211167? ago

Pointing out the fallacy of statistics and how they can be used to shift a narrative by bypassing truth. Sorry you can't keep up. Clearly not an autist, we're not even having the same conversation You win, we're obviously the stupid ones.

17211955? ago

Facts are facts, jack. If you dont like what they say, it aint my problem.

Some clown googling articles about resignations or arrests, is not a valid way to measure them.

Point out anything I said that isn't accurate, or that manipulates a narrative. You think Trump expanded Gitmo prison cells? He didn't, I proved it. You think resignations are up? I provided the only historical data of that metric, and it shows they aren't. Etc. etc. etc.

If people make a claim stating X is at historical levels, they need to back that claim up. I went looking and found the opposite of what they claim. Dont get mad at me, get mad at the people that lied to you.

17212270? ago

Dont get mad at me, get mad at the people that lied to you.

In other words:

WAAAAA! I'm the only truth teller and even though I'm only seeing 1/4 of the big picture, you're the dumb one for not reducing your perspective to only what I can perceive.

17213860? ago

That makes no sense. People are spreading misinformation, and I corrected it using sourced verifiable data. Glad to discuss the facts with you, if you see something that isn't accurate.

17214232? ago

No. You win. The board's all yours.

17214628? ago

??

Have I been talking to the same person this entire time? Lol. Doesn't surprise me. I encounter a lot of people in the Q weeds that get worked up and start making tons of posts.

17214749? ago

Wut? Post on GA so we know who you are.

17214898? ago

This is confusing because of the anonymous thing. I didn't make the OP, or the post with all the qdrops... my first post was the one with the links to all the research. I forgot about the anonymous thing on this board.

Now I understand why people were saying what the did. Yeah, that guy was rude.

17209810? ago

Then who built the Denver airport?

We seem to have different goals. I want true information so I can make informed decisions. You want what? Arrests? A military psy-op to give YOU the truth and not smoke out the traitors and seditious conspirators? What is your end game? Why are you willing to take so much time if not for a paycheck?

17210372? ago

You are really new to the truther movement, right?

17210432? ago

LOL at you kids and your boomer and new to the movement projections. Keep beating on that strawman, must be paid by the reply. Have a cuppa on me.

17330107? ago

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17329491

You nailed it. Paid to have the last word!

17209955? ago

I love how people seem shocked that others would do research, and not just read a meme and consider it the truth. Q literally tells people to not trust anyone and do your own research, but when I provide my research people say I'm crazy for doing it. You guys are so backwards with your logic.

I want true information so I can make informed decisions.

I just gave you the real truth about some of the biggest claims in this movement, and your response was to accuse me of being a shill, and question why I would spend time doing research.

You dont want the truth, you want your fantasy to be legitimized.

17209999? ago

You dont want the truth, you want your fantasy to be legitimized.

Or you want a straw man to beat on. You seem very intent on changing people's minds rather than simply seeking truth and trusting others to do the same. You're not responsible for our souls and only YOU get to live under the guidance of YOUR inner bullshit detector.

17210162? ago

I 'literally' told him it makes me no difference if he believes in the 4chan ghost or not.

You seem very intent on changing people's minds rather than simply seeking truth and trusting others to do the same.

I 'literally' just provided the truth, and was accused of being a shill. Your statement makes no sense. If you want to ignore the reality of the facts and trust the 4chan ghost, then be my guest.

This is the typical response I get from Qanon members when I provide evidence that goes against the storyline... avoid discussing the facts, and focus on my motives. Blah blah blah.

17210236? ago

I never called you a shill. I called you (gasp!)

NOT AN AUTIST

17210561? ago

??

The first response to me was "got to give it to your supervisor". These posts are anonymous, so I have no idea if you said it or someone else. The point was that 'someone' said it, so my statement was accurate.

Again, avoid the objective verifiable (accurate) data I provided, that proves some of the biggest claims of the movement false, and focus on me with ad-hominem attacks.

That's the calling card of the qanon movement. Fantasy over facts.

17210783? ago

We're all accustomed to dealing with overeducated stupid people who do nothing but regurgitate the talking points given to them by their supervisors and then can't answer any further questions and therefore go on the attack (just like you have) when asked to demonstrate their amazing research skills in real time.

Like simply providing an answer to the question "who built the Denver airport?"

17209971? ago

I didn't accuse you of being a shill, I asked you a bunch of questions that you didn't answer.

17210070? ago

Gotta give it to your supervisor. Why are you willing to take so much time if not for a paycheck?

Playing semantic word games now? Those statements imply that you think I'm a shill. Dont play dumb.

Again... I provided the 'real' truth, that corrected several pieces of misinformation, and your response was to question my motives. My motive is correcting the false information being spewed all over the internet.

The fact that you would question someone's motives for providing the truth, shows how spellbound you are.

17210529? ago

The fact that you would question someone's motives for providing the truth, shows how spellbound you are.

Or that the subs have been overrun with Shareblue shills and have a hard time you're not just another one, based on the condescension and arrogant assumption that you know everything there is to know, which also means you're probably fresh out of university and saddled with debt for the brainwashing you got that left you with no other employable skills.

17210621? ago

Or that the subs have been overrun with Shareblue shills and have a hard time believing you're not just another one

Yeah, well that's why I sourced everything... you dont have to take my word for it, you can look it up and verify that the facts are legitimate.

Look at all you guys avoiding the information, and focusing on my character. That's some cracker jack 'truth seeking'.

17210767? ago

Look at all you guys avoiding the information, and focusing on my character. That's some cracker jack 'truth seeking'.

Pot calls kettle black. You call us stupid, we tell you to fuck off. You didn't provide a link to the human trafficking stats under 44.

17210864? ago

The first response to me was someone calling me a shill: not true. I said all you guys are avoiding the information and making ad-hominem attacks: true.

Blah blah blah.

I provided the DOJ stats going back to 2014.

ICE 2015

ICE 2016

17210188? ago

The fact that you would question someone's motives for providing the truth, shows how deep you are caught up in this charade.

Sorry you're not an autist and your breakdown doesn't reek of brilliance to us. Seems like this is all about your ego, that you're posting with an agenda and pissed off that no one on a Q sub finds your anti-Q rant (if you wrote it yourself) convincing enough to take the black pill of nihilism you're pushing so hard.

You didn't answer my questions:

Who built the Denver airport?

You want what: Arrests? A military psy-op to give YOU the truth and not smoke out the traitors and seditious conspirators?

What is your end game?

Why are you willing to take so much time if not for a paycheck? (keeping in mind that each of us is responsible to discern truth for ourselves, why are you so upset that no one (but your buddies or other profiles) on a Q sub gives a shit what you have to say?

If you were respectful about it, we'd be nicer to you but we still wouldn't buy what you're peddling which is nihilism.

17210669? ago

Ad-hominem attacks and shifting the argument. The calling card of the Q 'truth seekers'.

I told you what my end game is: correcting misinfo spread around the internet.

Apparently you think that isn't a good enough reason.

17210748? ago

You've corrected the "misinformation" but surely you know who built the Denver airport since the article linked in the most recent (bullshit of course) Q drop states that no one knows for sure and surely you know the ultimate truth, right?

Why the ad hominem attacks just because no one's interested in what you're peddling because this is a military psy-op and you need to be an autist to understand all the comms?

A better strategy would be to follow the autists and try to discredit their information. Good luck.

17210806? ago

Wow, you are stuck on the Denver airport thing huh? Anything to avoid discussing the mountain of evidence I just presented, I guess.

I haven't researched the Denver airport, so there is no point in me weighing in on it. I'll take whatever your stance is on it as plausible for now, until if/when I decide to research it.

Why the ad hominem attacks just because no one's interested in what you're peddling because this is a military psy-op and you need to be an autist to understand all the comms?

Blah blah blah.

People like you are the enemy of truth. Ridicule others for doing research, even if their research is accurate.

17210883? ago

Just ridiculing you for making false assumptions and constantly projecting. The reason no one bothers with your so-called research is because you clearly have an agenda.

I stated from the beginning that it's a military psy-op. Psy ops are not intended to provide 100% accurate information. Some of us are cool with that, esp. when brilliant autists break things down with such precision months or years before the same information is verified.

You seem to be threatened by people trusting their own inner bullshit detectors in an age of ubiquitous gas lighting where your information is taken with a grain of salt, just like everything else.

17210984? ago

Just ridiculing you for making false assumptions and constantly projecting.

You called me a shill and questioned my motives with your very first post. Lol. I'm respectful until someone acts like a jerk... after that, if you dish it, you get it.

The reason no one bothers with your so-called research is because you clearly have an agenda.

Facts are facts, jack. If they dont tell you what you want to hear, it aint my problem.

17211131? ago

LOL I clicked on all your links just to give you the benefit of the doubt.

Stand firmly by my initial assessment: paid to spread nihilism.

17211878? ago

'Nuh uh' is not a rebuttal.

Everything I posted is sourced and accurate. It disproves some of the biggest claims in the movement.

Happy to discuss the facts with you, even though we both know that's not something you like to do. :)

17212189? ago

I'm not making any claims, I've been saying from the beginning that it's a psy-op and even asked what you expect from a psy-op.

I'm truly concerned about your investment in changing people's minds if you're not being paid. It's not healthy.

17214088? ago

It's not healthy to do research, and then share that information with others?

Are you hearing yourself?

Lol at the Dr. Phil concern trolling... 'im truly concerned' lol. Such a lame tactic. I could say the same thing to you about making multiple comments to me, without ever discussing the data.

If you see something that isn't accurate with the research, I'm glad to discuss it with you. If not, you're wasting our time.

17214610? ago

It's not healthy to do research, and then share that information with others?

You didn't do any research you posted up a bunch of Q posts that, because you don't understand the psy op even as you recognize that it is one in your OP, you say haven't unfolded exactly as written. It's literally a matter of weeks now, no reason to be heavily invested in a perspective when we'll have proof one way or another soon enough.

17214679? ago

This comment makes no sense. I didnt post a bunch of Q posts, I posted the research I did. Glad to discuss anything you see that isn't accurate. About 30 posts so far, and no one wants to talk about the facts.

Yeah, just a matter of weeks... soon... soon. Chase that can.

17214874? ago

Yeah I just realized that from another persons post. I didn't make the OP, or the post with all the Q drops. My first post was the one that had the research/links. I guess I should have clarified I was piggy backing, and that I was a different person. I forgot about the anonymous thing on this board.

Now I know why people were saying what they did. Yeah, that guy was rude.

17217511? ago

Your post was better researched but not infallible and you weren’t ‘not rude’ yourself.

17217949? ago

No one has refuted anything I presented. Feel free to point out what you think isn't accurate.

I was only rude after people insulted me. It was a confusing mix-up, just drop it.

17214218? ago

I want to discuss the increase in human trafficking arrests that you claim isn't real.

Anyway, you've convinced me to reclaim my life and split the scene. I'm not kidding.

You guys can have the boards, it's like trying to play chess with pigeons.

17212127? ago

even though we both know that's not something you like to do. :)

Again, why are you so invested that you keep making these self righteous attacks rather than act like an actual AMERICAN who understands that freedom of speech requires the ability to agree to disagree. Thinking you're smart because you paid some progressive nut jobs to brainwash you with easily regurgated gas lighting is not the same as being brilliant.

17214282? ago

It's essentially a fact. There have been probably 25 posts made to me, and none discuss the facts... it's all ad-hominem stuff like you are doing.

The first response to me called me a shill, and said there was something wrong with me for doing research. Kick rocks if you can't take that same type of rhetoric served back.

act like an actual AMERICAN who understands that freedom of speech requires the ability to agree to disagree.

I would love to discuss the facts with someone, but everyone here would rather sling mud at my character.

See something that isn't accurate with the research, glad to discuss it with you. If not you are wasting our time.

17214563? ago

The first response to me called me a shill, and said there was something wrong with me for doing research.

For the love of Christ or whatever you believe in, you people still believe in the Q Anon nonsense?

Your OP was disrespectful. You use the same tactics shills and then take it personally that ppl actually notice you using the same tactics. You just can't help but be condescending, it's hilarious because you obviously can't even step outside of yourself enough to self reflect on how you come across, but you're really good at projecting that the other guy started it by treating you with the same level of disrespect and scorn.

Although you have seen Manafort, Flynn, Stone, Gates, Pinedo, Alex van der Zwaan, Cohen, and Papadopoulos all go down.

For process crimes that the other side has done much more, setting the perfect foundation for equal prosecution under the law. It would be very easy to dismantle every one of your silly arguments, but you don't deserve it. I'm not kidding.

I would, however, be willing to meet back mid-April to finish the discussion since we'll know soon enough which of us has a better bullshit detector. What do you say?

17330157? ago

Don't forget that Manafort was a plant, he deserves to go to prison.

17214772? ago

Ok, well this explains some of the confusion here.

I didn't make the OP, or the post with all the Q drops. My first post was the one that had all the links to the research. I guess I should have clarified that I was piggy backing, and that I wasn't the same person. I forgot about the anonymous thing on this board.

Now I see why everyone was saying what they did. Yeah, that guy was rude.

17214332? ago

Still waiting on those raw numbers so we can discuss human trafficking. You're taking everything way too personally. All I did is point out the tactics you can't help but use that make us all think you're just another shill paid to try to get us to trust you over ourselves.

Like I said, though. You win. You doubters can have the boards. It's time to live real life.

17214725? ago

Same fucking source you told me wasn't reliable above. Fuck off shill.

17214840? ago

Wrong. This is a press release from the agency, not some random google article. It's how they disclose their numbers. We can use that report to compare Trump apples:apples to Obama.

But hey, if you want to throw the ICE reports out, fine. Then we are left with the source data from the DOJ that shows no increase in sex offense prosecutions.

Same thing. There is no evidence that shows Trump is doing significantly more than Obama. Disagree, then provide facts.

17214876? ago

Thank you. I'm leaving the Q movement because we're being lied to. Not even going to wait for March 20. I'm out now.

17211084? ago

Those are articles, where are the raw numbers comparing 2009-2016 vs. 2017 to now?

17211894? ago

Raw numbers for what claim? I posted sources within the articles.

17212507? ago

Human trafficking arrests 2009-2016 vs. 2017-now.

Not articles, but raw data. Show us you can do the research in real time.

I was replying to this, posted under the wrong comment because you're SO invested in changing my mind that there were a bunch.

17211019? ago

Your initial post is disrespectful, and your links are a joke.

17211856? ago

Because I said 'cut your losses'? Lol. Snowflake.

As far as my links: 'nuh uh' is not a rebuttal. Everything is accurate, and it disproves some of the biggest claims. Happy to discuss the facts with you. :)

17212169? ago

The links you provided come from unverified sources parroting your narrative, in an age of ubiquitous gas lighting people have to be allowed to discern for themselves. Progressive shills can't help but pepper their posts with sugarcoated attacks and then they freak out when everyone points out the obvious.

You're not responsible for me or my soul. Worry about yourself.

17212768? ago

Again... 'nuh uh' is not a rebuttal. Point out something that is an unverified source. Every fact is legitimately sourced, and it's accurate.

If you can't point them out, then you have no argument.

17212805? ago

Still waiting for the raw data re: 2009-2016 vs. 2017-now human trafficking arrests. Post that up to demonstrate that you wrote these walls of text yourself and maybe we'll have a discussion about facts.

Anything else is just projecting your own tactics. You're the one whose argument is in question, I'm not a q-tard, I'm here to watch the psy-op unfold.

17213579? ago

It's literally the news releases from ICE. It's not a reporter writing an opinion piece, it's the agency disclosing their numbers.

For the DOJ statistics that I provided, 2014-2019 that show no significant increase in sexual offense prosecutions, this is the report they came from.

https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/data_tables/jb_d2_0930.2018.pdf

17214265? ago

You said earlier that the news releases from the DOJ aren't sufficient. Play by your own rules and provide the raw data for both so we can compare real numbers.

17214470? ago

No I didn't. I said the Trump number was a compilation of news articles, global numbers, and different categories, of which there is literally no source. How can you compare numbers if the methods are different?

An agency releasing their numbers in a press release, is not the same thing as some knucklehead with a news feed counting google articles. It's hard data that can be compared apples:apples.

17214703? ago

An agency releasing their numbers in a press release s not the same thing as some knucklehead with a news feed counting google articles. It's hard data that can be compared apples:apples.

You're so fucking disrespectful, too distracted beating on your straw man and living by a double standard to discuss anything of substance.

I told you up front I subscribe to the DOJ releases where this data is disseminated in the same way as ICE on a regular basis. Now we're back at the beginning because you were too invested in telling me I'm stupid to discuss the actual issues and proved my point that it's valid information by relying on the exact same dissemination method yourself.

Clearly a person who doesn't know what it doesn't know.

17215185? ago

First of all, there has been some confusion that I just figured out. I am not the OP, or the guy that made all the Q drops. That guy was rude in his presentation. My first post was the one with the links/research. I forgot about the anonymous thing on this board, and forgot to say that I was a different person.

DOJ press releases cant be used for comparison, unless you use all the DOJ press releases under Obama. Otherwise, it's a false comparison. Intermittent press releases like that are a poor way to keep track, anyway.

I provided the official DOJ stats... why reject those? That's far more accurate than the intermittent DOJ press releases, and we can make an apples:apples comparison to the Obama years.

As far as ICE, those are press releases by the agency, that include their yearly numbers... that's how they disclose them. It's an apples:apples comparison to Trump.

Want to throw out the ICE reports for some reason? Ok. Then we are left with the DOJ statistics, which dont show a notable increase in sex offense prosecutions under Trump.

Same thing, no matter what apples:apples comparison you use... there is no evidence that Trump is doing significantly more than Obama.

17233124? ago

DOJ press releases cant be used for comparison, unless you use all the DOJ press releases under Obama. Otherwise, it's a false comparison. Intermittent press releases like that are a poor way to keep track, anyway.

I provided the official DOJ stats... why reject those? That's far more accurate than the intermittent DOJ press releases, and we can make an apples:apples comparison to the Obama years.

We don't have current numbers for the Trump Administration to compare apples vs. apples with 44. How do you propose we get them outside of DOJ and ICE releases?

17234249? ago

??

We have 2017 under Trump for ICE, and we have 2017 + 2018 DOJ stats under Trump.

17235528? ago

Then you're a different person than the person I was conversing with originally because that "person" claimed there wasn't info for Trump years, and DOJ /ICE eleases weren't sufficient. It's utterly insane to pretend Obama did more in 8 years than President Trump has accomplished in 2 with constant attacks plus the Zionist parasite right there by his side.

17239412? ago

Same guy.

No one is comparing 8 years vs 2. I'm comparing year by year. We can look at 2017 and 2018 individually, and compare them to what Obama did in 2016, or in an earlier year.

Trump does worse than Obama year by year, when comparing the stats. IOW, Obama had more HT arrests in 2016 than Trump did in 2017.

17243189? ago

You should really be on the chan boards arguing with the autists who put together the numbers on human trafficking arrests and high level resignations. Since you're just a copy/paste fag, you come here to shit all over the boards because you can't hold a candle to them.

I understand, you probably have a lot of student loan debt and no other employable skills. The other thing about posting on GA is that we can block/mute you since you're so desperate to get people not to trust themselves and think they're stupid for not being part of your herd.

17223244? ago

there is no evidence that Trump is doing significantly more than Obama.

LOL, ok dude.

Without that line I might have bought the spin that you're sane and didn't copy and paste your supposed research.

17232226? ago

That makes no sense. I provided sourced evidence that shows no significant uptick in human trafficking or sex offense prosecutions. Many categories show Trump doing worse than Obama, as with the ICE yearly report.

If you have evidence to show otherwise, post it.

17233168? ago

there is no evidence that Trump is doing significantly more than Obama.

You outed yourself with that line. In order for it to make sense from your perspective, you'd have to fight your way out of that dark room and into the daylight.

17234262? ago

Again, nothing but word salad from you. Facts are facts, jack. If you have facts that refute any claim I made, including what you quoted, feel free to provide them.

Memes dont count.

17235504? ago

You're right. You win. I'm turning Democrat.

17235746? ago

Can't keep up. Calls it word salad.

17239309? ago

LOL. I can keep up jack. None of you clowns can formulate a rebuttal to the evidence... all you do is make character attacks. Surprise me with something substantive. You can do it!

17243079? ago

You can't even get enough CCP to post your bullshit on GA so we can see how long you've been here, who you are and what other bullshit you're spewing. Just more projections because you come here calling us stupid and act offended when we respond in kind. You trust your info, and I'll trust mine. If you'd been around for more than a week and were an autist instead of an overeducated regurgitator of avg. IQ perhaps you'd be able to get through to us stupid Qtards, but alas ... we see you as desperate to oppress and eliminate self trust. Fuck off.

17246724? ago

Yeah it's because people downvote things that dont support their narrative, even if it is accurate.

People like you, who cant form a valid argument to save their lives. All you can do is ramble aimlessly about my character.

That's how I know my research is valid... no one can refute it. Prove me wrong.

17233078? ago

Go post your bullshit on GA so we know which of you rude regurgitators we're talking to.

17234271? ago

Who cares who is posting it? I could be Barack Obama and it wouldn't change the legitimacy of the research I provided... it's either accurate, or it isn't.

17235493? ago

You're not the only one posting, someone was trying to pretend he isn't a rude condescending asshole here to sow division yesterday when it was very hard to tell the difference in tone and post.

17239291? ago

There was confusion due to the anonymous poster thing. You are probably talking about me, but like I said it was a mix-up. Point remains that it doesn't matter who it is, the data is either legit or it isn't.

17243164? ago

I studied statistics and law. Watched them both skewed to legitimize corruption, fraud and racial tensions.

Go peddle that "you're stupid because I'm good at copy/paste and, since the OP didn't post anything that couldn't easily be refuted and I refuse to post non-anon on GA or even link to my original post, everyone else here is really stupid. Even though I can't post enough quality content to get the CCP necessary to post" bullshit somewhere else.

The restrictions exist for a good reason.

17246830? ago

Yeah it's because people downvote things that dont support their narrative, even if it is accurate. People like you, who cant form a valid argument to save their lives. All you can do is ramble aimlessly about nothing.

I gave you the requested raw data like 10 posts back, and all you can do is ramble.

That's how I know my research is valid... no one can refute it. Prove me wrong. Or dont, and waste more time regurgitating your ad-hominem garbage.

17261347? ago

Yeah it's because people downvote things that dont support their narrative, even if it is accurate.

There are many non-Q related non-anon subs where all you have to do is post quality content. Very easy to get enough CCP to post and downvoat within 24-48 hours if you're not a copy-paste regurgitator and have the ability to post quality content.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17260924

17264716? ago

I do post quality content. It gets downvoted by Qanon because they dont like facts that go against their narrative.

I couldn't care less what my CCP is. The research is the same whether it is posted here, or on another board.

17266605? ago

There are a handful of Qsubs and 1000s of non-Q subs. Try again.

17266638? ago

What's your point? Why are you so obsessed with me posting on another board? If you can't refute it here, you can't refute it anywhere else.

17267510? ago

You're interacting with various people, just easier to keep track that way. And see what other bullshit you're posting where you can't even get enough CCP to post after many days. You're the one who keeps replying like it's your job to have the last word in the thread.

The projections and inability to walk away leaving anyone still trusting themselves, rather than your copy-paste wall of text that you couldn't defend to the autists, are still entertaining.

17268988? ago

LOL. Another hypocrite that chastises someone for replying, as he continues to hit the reply button and type garbage. You are free to walk away at any time, chief.

100 garbage posts, and not a single one that was able to find fault in the research. That's a sign of solid work. Thanks everyone!

17269020? ago

No no thank you oh great copy and paste fag, for bestowing your wisdom upon us lowly Qtards, and esp. for doing it anon in a thread because you can't post enough quality content across all of voat to create a post yourself.

17269453? ago

How many times are you going to repeat that meaningless garbage? On the spectrum? I think repetition like this is a sign.

17269559? ago

^^Think Mirror ^^

Just giving you the opportunity to prove you don't have a mental illness that prevents you from leaving the conversation while the other guy still trusts himself. And that you're not paid to have the last post in each thread.

Everything you believe you're making fun of . . .

17270132? ago

LOL. You even steal my mental illness reference. There's no way you are older than 14. Keep trying to get the last word, hypocrite.

17270578? ago

LOL, your most precise projection yet!

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17209345

17272380? ago

That's not me, idiot.

17280118? ago

OP made the mh reference days before you did. No way to prove it is or isn't you, same tone in posts.

17284540? ago

There isn't any cursing in my posts, nor homophobic slurs.

We've exchanged probably 50 posts, and you only made a mh reference immediately after I did for the first time. Lame, and insecure.

17284932? ago

Where did you make a mh reference? Because that person's Schadenfreude reference is from days ago.

17288256? ago

Never laughed out loud in the middle of a yawn before.

You're the one who copy-pastes all of your replies and keeps circling around like a bot and then projecting naaaaanaaaaa when that's what you do to everyone who addresses your op. If you're human then you're here projecting on Qtards in order to feed your Schaudenfreude. You're making obvious that, to really get our nation back, we're going to have to bring back mental institutions for all the overeducated low IQs with no hope of ever seeing the big picture and too dumb to know what they don't know.

"It isn't that liberals are ignorant, it's just that they know so much that isn't true."

My personal favorite is that the number of high level resignations isn't out of the ordinary. And that President Trump is doing nothing more to comba ist HT than Obama did. Spin away to feed your illness. We'll be here to make sure you keep getting paid by the post until they take you away in a straight jacket while you sing about how stupid everyone but whoever gave you that copy-paste wall of text with all the blog links is.

17289925? ago

Blah blah blah.

My personal favorite is that the number of high level resignations isn't out of the ordinary. And that President Trump is doing nothing more to comba ist HT than Obama did.

I supported these claims with evidence. No one has refuted that evidence, or produced additional evidence that refutes it.

Facts are facts, jack.

17284845? ago

LOL, ok whatever you say oh wise sage without enough CCP (after how many days?) to make its own post.

17285083? ago

Yeah because CCP is so important, lolol.

Learn to think for yourself, then you can have an intelligent conversation about the research, instead of hoping that others will read it and tell you if it is legit.

17288107? ago

CCP indicates you have something - anything - of value to share other than copy paste bullshit but ok. Have another cuppa on me.

17288244? ago

How many times do I have to say that the majority of Qanon downvotes facts that dont support their narrative? Meaning the CCP goes down.

Here's a crazy idea... learn to think for yourself, then you will be able to discern between good/bad research, and wont have to ask people to post it where others can tell you if it's good/bad.

17288323? ago

learn to think for yourself, then you will be able to discern between good/bad research, and wont have to ask people to post it where others can tell you if it's good/bad.

I do think for myself, that's why I've tried numerous times to address the fallacies in your post, and you got pissed that I trusted ME over you and kept on replying. Now you are proving that you're literally a bot. Surreal.

17289866? ago

No one out of these 100 posts has refuted any of the data. People have made general comments saying 'yeah that's a stretch', and my reply is 'nuh uh is not a rebuttal'.

The only person who came close to discussing it, was this guy... but as you can see he didn't refute a single piece of the evidence, he just said 'nuh uh', and then tried to shift to other arguments.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17260924

17288309? ago

How many times do I have to say that there are a handful of Q subs and 1000s of NON-Q subs where you can post your high quality content.

Most voaters hate Qtards and love to bitch about them, so that's a lame excuse at best.

17289778? ago

You're assuming I give a rats behind about getting the CCP up. I dont care. I post the info in the comments and am happy to discuss the data with anyone that wants to have a conversation about it... which is no one in this thread.

17290935? ago

In other words

I'm just a simple bot, they didn't have time to work out the kinks necessary for me to be able to post quality content. I have one setting, to harass Qtards and force the black pill of nihilism down their throat. When they won't take it, I start to cycle back to the beginning in the hope another loop will create inner chaos (rather than humor) for them.

17291429? ago

You got issues man. I told you 50 posts ago that I didnt care about CCP, and that the reason it's low is because Qanon downvotes facts that go against the narrative. And yet, here we are with you continuing to harp on CCP. I can't explain it any more than that.

Not my fault if you dont have the intelligence to think for yourself, and debate the research.

17291705? ago

I told you 50 posts ago that I didnt care about CCP, and that the reason it's low is because Qanon downvotes facts that go against the narrative. And yet, here we are with you continuing to harp on CCP. I can't explain it any more than that.

How many Q boards are there? How many non-Q boards? It takes no effort to post quality content across Voat and get enough CCP to post within a day.

Assuming you're an informed human capable of posting quality content.

When your supervisor gives you copy-paste nonsense and expects you to defend only that, well then you prove that you're not the one writing the original long post, just locking horns with Qtards.

17296110? ago

Me: Hey here is some research, glad to discuss the details with anyone. Welcome critique.

You: HURRRR CCP. POST ON ANOTHER BOARD SO PEOPLE CAN TELL ME IF ITS GOOD. HUURRRR CCCP.

x50

17301820? ago

^^ copy paste bot fabricating excuses for not being able to make a post and refusing to post non-anon so it can be held accountable for all its posts.

17305566? ago

17307511? ago

You're both saying the same thing, idiot.

I'm probably talking to the same person. I find it hard to believe two people would be this autistic.

17308273? ago

Kek, someone already pointed out that you're afraid of the autists and thus post here.

17308358? ago

So what's your problem? You don't have the ability to think for yourself? You can't read the research and determine if it's legit?

17314778? ago

Can't think on your own? Point out something that isn't accurate with the research I posted.

17317616? ago

Kek, and from the copy paste fag!

17317657? ago

These qult scams require a certain type of people to thrive. You're a good little Q soldier. Deflect and troll.

17318210? ago

You haven't posted anything, just stuck your tongue out and hurled projections.
You can prove you're not a bot or paid to have the last word anytime. Or keep this going into perpetuity. Up to you.

We're compassionate and want you to be able to eat while you can.

You'll soon be unemployed, then how will you feed the demon?

God bless you. May the blood of Christ cover you and expose your demons for all to see until you release them or openly submit your soul to completion.

17318534? ago

I share knowledge. You deflect and ramble.

17323390? ago

Sorry, gotta let your ridiculous copy paste thread die for the good of us all.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17318310

17318310? ago

Don't feed the trolls. You're keeping this dead thread active by replying, which is what this OP wants. Stop.

17325890? ago

You're off your rocker if you think I'm the troll and he isn't. I posted info for discussion/critique, and he's made 50 posts telling me to post it in another sub to prove im 'not a bot'. Not once did he discuss the info posted.

17326109? ago

You're off your rocker if you believe I can't read the thread myself and see it for what it is. Your OP didn't work so you copy and pasted some other bullshit and pretended you're a different guy.

17326393? ago

LOL, nope. Doesn't surprise me that a conspiracy theory fan would jump to that conclusion, though. Still doesn't change the fact that he never discussed the info, and kept droning on and on about posting it in a different sub.

17328470? ago

No one cares what you think, copypastefag

17328887? ago

Oh no. The Qbot called me a bad name.

17328947? ago

Why are you so desperate to keep this dead thread alive? You keep proving everyone's point that you're either a bot or paid to have the last word. You're not even making any sense, just projecting that no one can refute a copypastefag whose been refuted numerous times.

17329491? ago

LOL. I knew you wouldn't be able to stop posting, even after saying not to keep posting. Can read you like a book. You fail at trolling, research, and keeping your word. Now get the last word because you cant walk away, even after saying you would walk away. LOL.

17312989? ago

Of course. It's not. You copy and paste your refutations, and they're not actual refutations.

God bless you.

17314769? ago

No one has posted anything to refute it, especially you. I welcome critique. All you want to do is troll.

17291448? ago

And I told you no one cares, we keep giving you the oppty to prove you're not a bot or paid to get the last word in a thread. You refuse to take it.

17296123? ago

Me: Hey here is some research, glad to discuss the details with anyone. Welcome critique.

You: HURRRR CCP. POST ON ANOTHER BOARD SO PEOPLE CAN TELL ME IF ITS GOOD. HUURRRR CCCP.

x50

17307613? ago

If you are going to claim that Trump is doing more, you need to compare data, not say things like 'HH recorded people and it will come to light'. The official human trafficking/sex offense numbers show no increase.

17301800? ago

You never addressed basic refutations, it was all nuntuh which you then projected on to everyone who attempted to interact with you. Because you're a bot with ONE program.

17307529? ago

No one refuted anything. Link to it, liar.

17247093? ago

You must be a bot programmed to continually circle back to the same narrative you started with because your programmers, just like you accuse us, refuse to accept any but the facts you spew. Go at it with the autists if you refuse to be respectful here. They'll eat you and your copy/paste bullshit for lunch.

edit: literal proof it's a bot

17247713? ago

Look at what I'm replying to, idiot. It's people saying the same thing, and for all I know it's the same person. I'm not going to customize a response to every knucklehead that says 'hurrrr you dont have ccp' or 'hurrr copy/paste'.

refuse to accept any but the facts you spew.

I'm begging you idiots for rebuttals to my research, and out of 75 posts no one has provided a single piece of evidence to refute what I posted. This is Qanon in a nutshell... people who couldn't research their way out of a wet paper bag, insulting those that can.

17250843? ago

So why not go post on the chans and ask the autists to refute you like has been suggested so many times? You're here to spin that everyone but your copy/paste writers is stupid and can't handle the fact that no one cares what you think. More and more of the evidence we used to be able to provide when asked for proof of things like ACLU updating the article from 2014 with alarming numbers of kids Obama was releasing traffickers to a 2018 article claiming the same thing about President Trump.

As history is re-written, shills infiltrate the threads with their prove it to me bullshit when most of us do the research when the drops are posted and don't keep every detail in our head for immediate reference. And who wants to waste time with someone who starts out so fucking disrespectful, ignores refutations, and then keeps saying "all y'all are stupid,you better stop trusting yourselves and take this black pill or I'm going to lose my shit"

Go post this stuff on the research boards and converse with the autists. You don't because you know they'll eat your lunch.

17260735? ago

^^This

17251917? ago

You're here to spin that everyone but your copy/paste writers

All my stuff.

So why not go post on the chans and ask the autists to refute you

Been there done that. My research/conclusions are watertight. Where there is no doubt, I state it, where there is some, I state it.

And who wants to waste time with someone who starts out so fucking disrespectful,

How many times do I have to explain this? The person that made this thread was rude. The person that posted the qdrops was rude. When I piggybacked on the qdrop post, I wasn't rude. People replied to me in a rude manner because they thought I was the qdrop guy. I returned their rudeness because I didn't know they were talking about the qdrop guy.

Look man, I posted my research to correct misinfo that's being spread. I dont care if you believe it or not, I'm posting it for visibility so more people can see it. If you think something isn't accurate about any of it, then make a case. Otherwise you are wasting our time.

The more you ramble, the more legitimacy it gives to my research. If you were able to refute any of it, you would have done it a long time ago.

17253511? ago

Since you're too smart for us, why not go at it with these people who are saying the same things we are? Post up the links so we can follow along.

https://twitter.com/threadreaderapp/status/1104153097637634048 (author can be found at drawandstrike) https://twitter.com/ckolacia/status/1104421405066702848

17253782? ago

Lol, you think I need to be vetted by a retired boomer on twitter? LOLOLOL.

And the other guy you linked, agrees with me that the 50k sealed indictment claim is hogwash.

https://i.imgur.com/78JDUTC.png

17255650? ago

17256377? ago

Memes. LOLOLOL.

17254482? ago

If you had ever figured out how to link to your original post, we might have had a good discussion.

17254663? ago

You had to read it to get to this post. So you're telling me A: you dont remember it, and B: you dont know how to get back to it.

Explains a lot.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17209097

17255366? ago

Tell us more. Refute at drawandstrike on this thread like someone else asked about a different one, and then post up the link to show all of us stupid Qtards how it's done.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1104523968554389504.html

17256437? ago

LOL. You are shifting the argument. Nice tactic. Comes in useful when you cant formulate a rebuttal to the topic being discussed.

17255292? ago

I'm telling you it was never clear who you are and what you posted. Why speculate when we should know within weeks at this point. I'd offer to meet back in a few weeks but I'd rather you sit on your delusional high ground believing you've won and we're all too stupid to refute your copy and paste bullshit.

Peace out.

17256367? ago

I posted the link, after you were too stupid to find it, and yet you still drool on the keyboard. LOL,.

Q has taught you well. Be presented with facts that dont support your position, and just post rambling nonsense and ad-hominem attacks for 30 posts, so it looks like you are doing something for 'the cause'.

And yes... you are too stupid to even attempt to refute the research. That's why you've posted garbage for 30 posts, and then referred me to a retired boomer on twitter... LOLOLOL.

17260656? ago

and then referred me to a retired boomer on twitter... LOLOLOL.

^^ divisive shill thinks no one can scroll up. You copy and pasted your supposed research, refused to address reftuations, called everyone stupid, pretended you're not OP, and in every post outed yourself as a paid shill and now we know you're mad at your parents for doing such a horrible job raising you to be a divisive asshole hoping the traitors prevail.

We've capitulated and worshipped your intelligence, and yet you still can't let it go. We're stupid, we get it. Move along.

17264668? ago

No one refuted anything. Post it and prove me wrong. You are a liar, and a fool. Keep chasing that can.

17253258? ago

We’ve already bowed down to your obvious superiority and sent you off to the chans because we can’t keep up. You seem more and more like a bot circling back around with every post. Someone even posted multiple copy paste posts you made. But I know you’re real! And you’re here because you love us! Sure you have issues with your boomer parents but who doesn’t amirite?

Still, I wonder. Why do you keep posting when we’ve capitulated, you are obviously much smarter than any of us and certainly the autists, which is why you don’t bother with them?

You’re here trying to make us feel hatred so your master can infiltrate us, but we love you and wish nothing more than for for the light of truth to shine brightly upon you for all to see how brilliant you are and, most importantly, your deep care in trying to educate us lowly Qtards.

We sincerely pray that you and your masters be covered in the blood of Christ.

God bless you, and thanks again for enlightening us all.

Again, God bless you oh wise one. Thank you so very much.

Love and light.

17253483? ago

Love the hypocrisy. I'm only responding to your rambling repetitive posts, yet somehow you dont understand why I keep posting. I'm responding to you, genius.

You're clueless. As evidenced by the fact you would make 20 rambling ad-hominem garbage posts, instead of ever discussing the research. Typical Qanon 'truth seeker'. Keep chasing that can.

I look forward to your next garbage post.

17253731? ago

You were asked many times to post a link to your research post, you never dud.

You were given information refuting statistics, didn’t address it.

Recommended to the chans, won’t devate the autists.

Sent to Twitter.

Still here circling the drain like a bot. No one cares and you can’t let it go, as if you’re paid to get as many replies as possible before having the last word in threads.

God bless you for trying to bring enlightenment here. May God’s grace surround you and the blood of Christ wash over you every time you even think of coming to interact with the poor ignorant Qtards. And let you know we’re just not worth it, so don’t bother.

17253894? ago

What are you talking about? The very first post I made included links/sources. Someone later asked me for the HT data, and I provided all of the ICE reports as well as the DOJ statistics report.

https://voat.co/v/QRV/3081067/17209097

You were given information refuting statistics, didn’t address it.

No one has provided any data that refutes the claims I made in my first post. Post where they did. If you can't, you're lying.

No one cares and you can’t let it go, as if you’re paid to get as many replies as possible before having the last word in threads.

Lol. Each time you post, you are attempting to get the last word, and are making more posts than I am. Hypocrite.

No one is twisting your arm to keep making these garbage posts. I'm enjoying it, though. :)

Imagine what we could have accomplished if you had spent half this time discussing the data, instead of making garbage posts.

17260994? ago

17232951? ago

Finally talked to your supervisor, eh?

17234220? ago

Probably 50 comments have been made to me since I posted those facts, and not a single person has been able to refute anything. It's all character attacks. The calling card of Qanon. Feelings over facts.

17235681? ago

I've read all the comments. You're being disingenuous. Trust your bullshit detector. I'll trust mine.

You're here to prove we're all rigid closed minded idiots. Cool. Believe what you want, no one is here to impress you and if you want answers, since you won't post on GA, then you should have linked to your own fucking post because we've all given enough time to your bullshit.

No denying the uptick in immigration since President Trump took office. Importing more trafficked people while there's an increase on LE = increase in crime + stats. It's not hard to refute your arguments, it's not worth bothering because it's obvious that dialogue isn't what you're here for. You're here to try to make people feel stupid and doubt themselves.

In the age of ubiquitous gas lighting and constantly fudged statistics to support the narrative (like the huge uptick in hoaxed hate crimes since Trump entered the race, etc.), all we can do is trust our inner discernment mechanism, which is what frightens you and your masters so much.

17239588? ago

It's not hard to refute your arguments, it's not worth bothering because it's obvious that dialogue isn't what you're here for. You're here to try to make people feel stupid and doubt themselves.

Kick rocks with the armchair psychology. The 'oh it's not worth my time' excuse is as old as the hills.

I can't make a new post in GA because of site restrictions. Make one, link it and I will post in it, if that is what you want.

all we can do is trust our inner discernment mechanism, which is what frightens you and your masters so much.

I used objective, verifiable facts to support my claims. No one here has refuted any of it. Surprise me. Or don't... I really don't care what you think, but 'nuh uh' is not a valid rebuttal.

17242979? ago

You really don't want to accept the fact that, in the age of ubiquitous gas lighting, people trust the information they research themselves and they're own inner bullshit detectors over your copy/paste regurgitations.

Free thinking people who can't be shamed into putting your perspective over theirs is what your masters fear most. If you don't have enough CCP to post on GA, it means you're not making good enough posts around Voat (there are many non-anon and non-Q (even making fun of Qtards) subs where it's easy to gain the required CCP in 24-48 hours as long as you post quality content. You just don't.

17246762? ago

Yeah it's because people downvote things that dont support their narrative, even if it is accurate. People like you, who cant form a valid argument to save their lives. All you can do is ramble aimlessly about my character.

That's how I know my research is valid... no one can refute it. Prove me wrong. Or dont, and waste more time regurgitating your ad-hominem garbage.

17235719? ago

Probably 50 comments have been made to me since I posted those facts

How much are you paid for each reply?

17217664? ago

There are already stats for the Obama years, DOJ and ICE releases best way to compile numbers until they’re released.

17217928? ago

I'm not sure if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me. I think you are agreeing, as I provided the DOJ/ICE sources.

17213069? ago

I could provide that data in 2 minutes just from following links provided on the board today. This research dude regurgitating walls of text that were provided to him should easily have the raw numbers by now.

17213798? ago

Sorry, I dont have my PC attached at the hip. I provided the information already.

I wrote everything in the OP. Glad to discuss the facts with you, if you see something that isn't accurate.

17214255? ago

I didn't see any links to raw data in the OP.

17209285? ago

Offff course it’s this nigger. The copy paste bandit.. hahaha fuck off already

17209500? ago

It's all my research, except for a small portion of the human trafficking section.