Analysis of Q2653 by the doctor from Australia who was deregistered and bankrupted for blogging support of Q. From two blog posts.

https://www.psychiatristandpsychologist.com.au/2019/02/03/post-3rd-february-2019-a/

https://www.psychiatristandpsychologist.com.au/2019/02/03/post-3rd-february-2019-b/

Post – 3rd February 2019 - A

INTRAVENOUS KIDDIE INFUSIONS FOR RBG?

Sounds a bit far fetched. Granted.

Potentially however there may be some flesh in the recent Q posts regarding RBG, which could point to something we ought be chewing over.

What initially struck me as odd was that quite soon after Q2653, there was an obscure Clinical Trial that appeared on FullChan and Voat (QRV).

As a Doctorfag, I decided to check it out, but soon found that I had an urge to Ralph all over my Laptop. I had briefly seen it a couple of years ago but had not looked at it in detail.

It is self-evident that this Clinical Trial is a different beast altogether. Hence, although unlikely related to the Q drop mentioned above, I reckon exposing it to light, is right.

Remember the Deep State is doing everything to keep RBG alive. They want Third Trimester Abortion to be codified into Law (as per HRC) and most importantly the Military Trials canned, so they don’t get hanged.

I shall divide cursory analysis of this Clinical Trial into four parts:

A) Reasoning for and against an association with RBG

B) Background to Clinical Trial

C) Assessment of the paper at hand

D) Implications of said paper

Herein lies the Clinical Trial:

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3f13/00e0d9f6ec65c05c84c324b0aeea2b861a9e.pdf

In short it outlines the use of Fetal Stem Cells to treat Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) by intravenous infusion.

Reasoning for and against an association of the Trial with RBG

To be sure, the Q Team has NOT given any indication at all of what type of disease RBG may or may not have. It is up to us to research, think laterally and hopefully learn along the way.

In yesterday’s blog posts, I outlined the character of RBG. There is no doubt given her Satanic ideology that injecting kiddies would be morally acceptable to her.

For AD

1. President Trump has tweeted as far back as 2016 regarding RBG’s cognitive decline. It is obvious for all to see that she has a few too many Roo’s loose in her top paddock.

2. The official story of a Pneumonectomy and R/O two malignant nodules in the lung is not transparent. It is rare to have two primary lung cancers occurring simultaneously. More likely are two secondary’s occurring from another primary lesion, such as the breast or bowel. Having histopathology performed on the lesions is mandatory, yet this has not been divulged. This is very odd.

3. Q alluded that the stated diagnosis is not correct. We know that Q correctly predicted John McCain’s death and that his brain tumour may have been a ruse.

4. Importantly, Q stated that RBG was receiving ‘off-market’ treatment. As a Doctor this is an odd term to use. We all use ‘off-label’ drugs to treat medical conditions at times. That is, medications which are not evidence-based, or as is the case in Australia, are not subsidised by the Government. As Specialists we will do this on occasion when other treatments have failed and the medication may theoretically be of benefit, or the patient is willing to pay. Personally, I will only use such meds in extenuating cases, however it is commonly done here. I can not speak to America.

‘Off-market’ treatments are those which are essentially banned in a specific country. This may be because of ethical considerations or toxicity/lethality.

Q insinuates that it is the Deep State that is treating RBG and hence the rogue CIA, likely SAD. Most certainly they would have access to said treatments, no matter how illegal. There is no problem with them getting radical for a Radical.

1. An Anon on the boards has mentioned that Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre in New York has two floors which are sectioned off for ‘secret treatments’. RBG is being treated there and so it is possible that she could get Fetal Stem Cell infusions undetected.

Against AD

1. RBG has had major surgery with a sudden acute deterioration such that she cannot work at all. There are a whole host of post-operative complications which could have occurred, including poor cerebral perfusion causing cognitive impairment. Occam’s Razor applies. Any of these conditions can cause significant morbidity or mortality. Q accurately predicted the day before that RBG would NOT turn up for work – another Q proof.

2. ‘Ambrosia young blood infusions’ may be in play. That is, feeding RBG, teenager’s blood. This is not illegal as it is just blood transfusions, although it is ethically malignant. It is not ‘off-market’.

3. It is possible she is just drinking blood and eating kiddies as she has always done and there is no AD.

4. RBG may be receiving medication ‘off-market’ for symptom amelioration for any other putative diagnosis.

continued in part B

Post – 3rd February 2019 – B

INTRAVENOUS KIDDIE INFUSIONS FOR RBG?

Background to Clinical Trial

The study was performed in Ukraine.

Using Fetal Stem Cells in all Western countries, including America, is strictly controlled and only available for research studies in very limited and supervised trials.

Ukraine is the only country in the world where the use of Fetal Stem Cells is available for the treatment of patients.

Essentially this trial obtains a number of babies in the 7-12 weeks age bracket. The researchers hacked the babies up and sucked out the brains and livers. They then snap froze them using cryogenics. Later the liver cells were injected peripherally, presumably into the patient’s cubital fossa and the brains were subcutaneously injected into the abdomen due to the fragility of the cells.

The number of smorgasborded babies used per person is not outlined due to the politically incorrect nature of revealing said information.

Obviously Ukraine engages in such trials because it is a pure Deep State country with morals consistent with the levels of endemic corruption. The Uki ethics committee for the trial was either pissed off their faces on local Vodka, or had been tossed a stack of Hryvnia’s, by Petro ‘Porky” Poroshenko.

Fetal Stem Cells are used; because Adult Stem Cells, Umbilical blood and Embryonic Stem cells are theoretically considered inferior. Similarly traditional blood drinking is considered less advantageous due to first pass metabolism in the liver.

Assessment of the paper at hand

There are two arms in the trial. One is essentially ‘treatment as usual’ with either Cholinesterase Inhibitors or blockers of glutamate NMDA receptors. The other is treatment as usual plus the Fetal Stem Cells.

Alzheimer’s Disease was assessed by DSM-IV TR with participants being of mild to moderate severity and then results measured by changes in the ADAS-cog screening tool.

Interestingly the Control Group is older, has more time since diagnosis, and lower cognitive abilities by MMSE at trial initiation than the Treatment Group. These mismatches are statistically significant.

The study is not a RCT (Randomised Control Trial) as there is no blinding, true randomisation and sham treatment.

The results do demonstrate statistical significance in terms of lowering ADAS-cog scores however they do not reach clinical significance. In Australia and most countries around the world, we do not continue pharmacological treatment of AD if the ADAS-cog does not improve more than four points with treatment.

Implications of paper

The Clinical Trial is not a Gold Standard RCT it is just a Comparative Study. The study has low numbers and a very loose methodology. The results do not meet clinical significance. The treatment arms were skewed to favour the Fetal Stem Cell treatment group. This may of been intentional or just fortuitous. The peer review has been poor with little attention to errors.

To be crystal clear.

This paper demonstrates NO evidence-based medicine indication for the use of Fetal Stem Cell treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease.

If this is the treatment that RBG is receiving, then it is patently illegal and her doctor’s should be held to account.

Any Psychiatrist or Psychogeriatrician reading this ought present the paper at Medical Grand Rounds. The ethical implications are profound and worthy of discussion.

Obviously The Medical Council of NSW, a 100% proven Deep State entity, would politically endorse all cannibalistic medical treatments in Australia. They will deregister any doctor solely for expressing political views which support President Trump.

Make Australia Great Again,

Dr Russell McGregor

@killaudeepstate

WWG1WGA