I'll say this in response to this article... Go and tell me what you make of Q drops 2309, 2310 and 2311. Then I would like you to tell me what you make of Q drops 1536 and 2137. There are other instances I could have you examine but I think the above mentioned drops are good enough for now. Also, Microchip wants credit for being Q but doesn't want to divulge his identity? An anonymous poster can't claim to be another anonymous poster and remain anonymous. There is no validation in that sequence of events. You outline instances on how microchip could of faked everything that transpired between the two of you. If microchip wants notoriety it would certainly be in his interests to do the things you spoke of to "prove" he is Q.
Let's examine some of your contradictions in your "article". First you say this... "One of the issues with this is that “Q Clearance” is not found in military intelligence. It is a Department of Energy designation, and deals exclusively with nuclear programs information. To date, QAnon has not posted insider information about US nuclear programs"... Correct. The Q clearance was started in the DoE after the manhattan project. Second you say this... "And Q was born. The letter was the perfect letter. It was used in a novel by Luther Blisset first published in Italian in 1999. In the novel, the setting is the 16th Century Reformation of the Catholic Church. It is also the clearance seal of the United States for access to the most secret intelligence matters including top restricted and formerly restricted data and national security information"... So which is it? I''ll give you a hint. I already know the answer. Q alone is level 3 security clearance and is equivalent to the DoD Top Secret designation. There is a higher level. That would be level 4. You would need SCI and SAP access along with Q clearance to be privy to any and all classified info.
Lastly is how you conclude your article and it almost made me throw up in my mouth. You say this... "While the people involved in this movement may have began posting as Q for whatever reasons, the fact remains that people did enjoy these posts and this form of information. Perhaps that can be the starting off point for a new series of riddles and puzzles and a new type of information system. There certainly appears to be an interest in it – but from the start, whoever ends up running it should always be honest, open, and truthful about who they are, and their motives." There is nothing OPEN, HONEST OR TRUTHFUL about an anonymous poster claiming to be another anonymous poster. Furthermore, it's you claiming that he claimed that in an article you refuse to divulge his true identity in. That's a bit much for someone who supposedly supports OPEN, HONEST AND TRUTHFUL communication of information. Until Microchip divulges his true identity and gets online and posts as Q, my new theory on Q is just as true as this nonsense. Here's a link to my theory. I hope you enjoy it. https://voat.co/v/QRV/2871553
PS You better respond to the above mentioned drops before you mention anything else in regards to refuting my response. Anything other than that will get ignored. Have a blessed day.
view the rest of the comments →
15223636? ago
I'll say this in response to this article... Go and tell me what you make of Q drops 2309, 2310 and 2311. Then I would like you to tell me what you make of Q drops 1536 and 2137. There are other instances I could have you examine but I think the above mentioned drops are good enough for now. Also, Microchip wants credit for being Q but doesn't want to divulge his identity? An anonymous poster can't claim to be another anonymous poster and remain anonymous. There is no validation in that sequence of events. You outline instances on how microchip could of faked everything that transpired between the two of you. If microchip wants notoriety it would certainly be in his interests to do the things you spoke of to "prove" he is Q.
Let's examine some of your contradictions in your "article". First you say this... "One of the issues with this is that “Q Clearance” is not found in military intelligence. It is a Department of Energy designation, and deals exclusively with nuclear programs information. To date, QAnon has not posted insider information about US nuclear programs"... Correct. The Q clearance was started in the DoE after the manhattan project. Second you say this... "And Q was born. The letter was the perfect letter. It was used in a novel by Luther Blisset first published in Italian in 1999. In the novel, the setting is the 16th Century Reformation of the Catholic Church. It is also the clearance seal of the United States for access to the most secret intelligence matters including top restricted and formerly restricted data and national security information"... So which is it? I''ll give you a hint. I already know the answer. Q alone is level 3 security clearance and is equivalent to the DoD Top Secret designation. There is a higher level. That would be level 4. You would need SCI and SAP access along with Q clearance to be privy to any and all classified info.
Lastly is how you conclude your article and it almost made me throw up in my mouth. You say this... "While the people involved in this movement may have began posting as Q for whatever reasons, the fact remains that people did enjoy these posts and this form of information. Perhaps that can be the starting off point for a new series of riddles and puzzles and a new type of information system. There certainly appears to be an interest in it – but from the start, whoever ends up running it should always be honest, open, and truthful about who they are, and their motives." There is nothing OPEN, HONEST OR TRUTHFUL about an anonymous poster claiming to be another anonymous poster. Furthermore, it's you claiming that he claimed that in an article you refuse to divulge his true identity in. That's a bit much for someone who supposedly supports OPEN, HONEST AND TRUTHFUL communication of information. Until Microchip divulges his true identity and gets online and posts as Q, my new theory on Q is just as true as this nonsense. Here's a link to my theory. I hope you enjoy it. https://voat.co/v/QRV/2871553
PS You better respond to the above mentioned drops before you mention anything else in regards to refuting my response. Anything other than that will get ignored. Have a blessed day.