So, you keep seeing bullshit about this SBBH group here on Voat. Isn't it annoying? All the drama is stupid, unnecessary, and it's certainly quite the pest. It wouldn't make a whole lot of sense to disagree with those sentiments, so I won't. But, with all of that being said, dealing with these things is certainly necessary, and in much the same way that we had to deal with bullshit from /leftypol/, SRS, (time and fucking time again) and other groups over the years that seem to have sprouted to combat the very thing we all come here to celebrate - free speech and organized sharing of information -, we've had to deal with a local group named Soap Box Ban Hammer here on voat. Now, I get it, they claim to be anon. Too bad for them, anons don't group up on sites and try to take over mod teams, they don't brigade the hell out of users they don't agree with, and they don't make attempts to perpetuate tired ideologies like glorifying Hitler and Nazis (who both helped Zionists and were assisted profusely by Rothschilds and other rich bloodlines), make obvious attempts to divide people using race, age, or gender, or identify characteristics about themselves. These people, however, have made clear time and time again, that they indeed are not apart of anonymous in the way of revealing their gender (u/srayzie u/triggerlypuff) (as a side note, u/srayzie gets really upset when you post this so I figured I would add it), praising hitler (u/crensch, u/zyklon_b, u/expertshitposter), brigading or very obviously starting unneeded drama that leads to division (u/kevdude, u/heygeorge, u/gabara etc.), and invading mod teams (u/Vindicator: https://voat.co/v/whatever/2252417 just ctrl+f "Vindicator")

Anyway, let's get to it, shall we?

Crensch was being an annoying faggot as per usual not too long ago and in being annoyed I dug a little bit on him. https://www.reddit.com/user/crensch reveals his infatuation for rabbits. So, what did I do? I started bugging him about bunnies. Unfortunately for us (and entirely unsurprisingly), Crensch has yet to respond about his bunnies.

So, after sitting on things for a little while, and after Crensch CLEARLY blocked me for it, I requested a little help from an anon. This anon revealed to me their suspicion (we'll just say they were suspicious of such ;D), which was that Crensch was indeed a user from Reddit who claims they've been a mod for years at the site, named "Creq". Then, I proceeded to confront the user of said account and have produced the following graphic from the resulting response: https://archive.fo/gXMgc

Before I say much more, let me walk you through the graphic:

The top left corner displays user from Reddit, "creq" replying to someone uninvolved. On an account that has since been swept, I ask user "creq" a simple question: "still have those bunnies?" In response, user "creq" says, "Still hung up about hopping the 'great firewall' which might as well be as air tight as a screen door? If you think it's so damn great why don't they get people to stop all their damn failed ssh attempts to any box that has port 22 open?" Well, isn't that a fucking weird response to someone that has NEVER INTERACTED WITH YOU BEFORE? Or... wait just a minute... have we interacted before? lol

The bottom left shows two pictures posted to Reddit by a user going by the name "Crensch". A link to this account is posted above in the third paragraph. We can see that user "Crensch", as per these posts, has been on Reddit for AT LEAST multiple years by this point (roughly two months ago).

The center features yours truly asking a simple question, to which I've never gotten a response (at least on Voat).

The top right simply shows that Crensch has been on Voat for, at the time, 3.1 years, which is funny since that more or less lines up with the timeframe given to us by the posting details of the bunny posts on Reddit.

As if it wasn't getting clear enough at this point, the bottom right features user "Creq" from Reddit mentioning he's been a mod FOR THE LAST 3 YEARS. "Creq" then goes on to mention that he's a former mod of r/technology, who has a very obvious history at the site I'm sure we don't need to reiterate at the time.

So, why should someone care about some stupid graphic? Well, it's simple: if we can link the infested group comprised largely of mods here at Voat to self-proclaimed mods for years over at Reddit, we're following a line similar to that of Gamergate and what was all uncovered there. This is to say, if Reddit's mods truly are compromised in a wide scale and we can link it to a rather large group of accounts here at Voat, a Reddit clone, then we can expand the spider web in order to know who to avoid, and procure other objectives or ideas of note to assist other anons in their perusing of shaky ground similar to that of Reddit or Voat, any of their clones, and other similar sites.

But, what do we do with this information?

You'll likely ask.

Well, good. I'm glad you did ask! Let me explain:

The easiest way to spot shills and not be fooled by them is to know who they associate with, what kinds of things they like to say and do, and what kinds of things they've done in the past. All I want anyone to do with this information is be aware that there are people here, planted or unplanted, who are here to control narratives, crack consensus, forum slide, brigade dissenters, gather intelligence about said dissenters, and keep wandering "goats" (what they call the userbase here) from veering off the planned course AMONG MANY OTHER THINGS.

Sorry that this isn't directly Q related, as I don't intend to do this anymore, or at least not often. Frankly, I've already made enough noise in PLENTY of spheres about these incompetent asshats. I'm sure some of you are getting tired of hearing about it. Just know what I'm doing is mostly for the new guys or people that don't know better.

As a side note: @womb_raider @middle_path @chiefpacman @captainstrange @Warnos44 @needlestack @stillinit @tossyokeys @theodorekent are all cool "goats". Treat them kindly, please (although none or few of them seem to be interested in Q things). Just want to note that I may have missed some, though.

@doob is also cool, but seems to be easily bothered ;) He seems to follow Q, though, so maybe pick his brain too, if you'd like since he's been around for a while.

Well, this got long, so my apologies. Sorry again for taking up space with largely unnecessary information, but I never would've posted anything if I didn't think it was at least slightly important.

Carry on, anons. Happy voting day!