14624085? ago

Could the first amendment rights of the employee protesters be violated, if they are protesting on public property?

If I worked for a protest company, and I were ordered (by my employer) to be silent about my personal convictions, and promote opinions I am personally opposed to, on public property, is that considered a violation of my 1A rights? The key point being that it is being done on public property.

14609455? ago

This is just so fucking sad, where the hell is our DOJ to protect us from bullshit like this. Fucking sucks being the minority voter against the NPC fucktards we call liberals.

14607332? ago

Professional harassment.

14606516? ago

OP here, when you read this article you can see that these companies are engaging in blatant extortion and need to be prosecuted.

14606550? ago

Hey, thanks again for sharing the article.

Fits in nicely with the recent news about Soros(Explosive device found near his home).

You're absolutely right they need to be prosecuted - the hard part is finding a way to do it; defining the crime they've committed is difficult, so far as I can tell.

That said... if Charles Manson can be charged and then jailed for life over allegedly inciting the Tate(et al) murderers, perhaps something can be said for those who incite(and pay) crowds to disturb the peace, disrupt due process, vandalize/riot/loot/harass/assault, etc...

14606338? ago

I’m not sure how this is legal. Paying a mob to protest should go somewhere under vandalism.

14610231? ago

or disturbing the peace.

14607903? ago

Safe to say, we should gas the kikes and stupid subversive counter productive shit like this would fade away

14607858? ago

It exposes the organizer to law suits if anything goes wrong. If the paid person is offered incentive to commit a crime (like assault or vandalism), then a prosecutor would probably pursue charges against the organizer because inciting crime is unlawful. Here is what hasn't been tested or considered. The new breed of law about stalking, criminal harassment, that swept the world in the 90s and 00s, problematizes and pretty much criminalizes even the mildest actions paid protestors are doing when the target is (arguably) a person instead of group. If I were to make a company offering paid campaigns of harassment in order to get someone to commit suicide, I would expect to be charged criminally under statutes that cover inciting/provoking/hiring crimes (criminal harassment if not murder). I would not expect free speech protections to apply especially if mine and my employees' motive is obviously profit.

14607647? ago

Commercial rather than political speech. WAY less Constitutional protections.

BTW the payments for potential fines? Totally bogus. You can REIMBURSE, but up front its a payment. Sic the IRS on this. "1099 employees" that are likely not paying a lick of taxes....

14607623? ago

Inciting a riot

14607569? ago

Agreed, if Fake News is removed from Facebook then this should go as well.

14606711? ago

If it is indeed legal, then we need to push for legislation. Not sure I see how this is different than any other mafioso tactic of extortion. We encourage protests, but they must be real and genuine.

14607601? ago

And peaceful

14606485? ago

I'm sure there's a few things it could theoretically fall under.

Depending on the nature of the protest in question and those splashing money around, some of these situations could very well be considered seditious. I've got no background in the legal profession, though, so I'm speculating at best there.

14607359? ago

One could argue the intent of these protests are known based on what we know of Soros' history as well as from his own words.